Show Notes
Vai Latvija patiešām ir drošībā?
Šis jautājums izskan pēdējos gados arvien biežāk. Parastā atbilde ir vienkārša – mēs esam NATO dalībvalsts, mums ir sabiedrotie, un mums ir aizsardzības plāni.
Ko mēs darīsim , ja mūsu jautājumus ir nepariez?
Šajā epizodē Māris filozofē un komentē par tā saukto Putina Baltijas mapi piedāvā citu uzskatu pa Baltijas drošību.
Vai Krievijas mērķis patiešām būtu ieņemt Latviju, Igauniju vai Lietuvu? Jeb vai tomēr daudz svarīgāks mērķis ir radīt šaubas, sašķelt NATO sabiedrotos un vājināt Rietumu politisko gribu?
Epizodē aplūkota Putina domāšana, autoritāru režīmu psiholoģija, informācijas karš un propaganda, kā arī tas, kā demokrātiskas sabiedrības var kļūt ievainojamas nevis militāra spēka, bet pašu šaubu dēļ.
Šī nav epizode tikai par Krieviju.
Viņa ir epizode par Latviju.
Par mūsu spēju domāt kritiski.
Par sabiedrības vienotību.
Par uzticēšanos.
Par to, kā maza valsts var saglabāt savu spēku pasaulē, kurā arvien biežāk karš sākas nevis ar tankiem, bet ar idejām.
Jo dažreiz bīstamākais ierocis nav raķete.
Tas ir pasaules uzskats. ⸻ Šajā epizodē • Kas ir tā sauktā Putina Baltijas mape? • Vai NATO spēks ir vienīgi militārs? • Kāpēc Putins varētu meklēt politisku, nevis militāru uzvaru? • Kā darbojas informācijas karš un dezinformācija? • Ko tas viss nozīmē Latvijai? • Kā mazas valstis var stiprināt savu noturību? ⸻ Kautkas sakāms? Sūti e-pastu šeit:- [email protected] ⸻ Atslēgvārdi Latvija, Baltijas valstis, Baltijas drošība, NATO, Putins, Putina Baltijas mape, Vlad Vekslers, Vlad Vexler, Krievija, Ukraina, ģeopolitika, starptautiskās attiecības, informācijas karš, propaganda, dezinformācija, autoritārisms, demokrātija, nacionālā drošība, Latvijas drošība, kritiskā domāšana, politiskā analīze, diasporas latvietis, Eiropas politika, Baltijas ģeopolitika, latviešu podkāsts, No Malas Redzams, Māris.
—————————————
No Malas Redzams – Episode 2
Putin’s Baltic File – Are We Asking the Right Questions?
Is Latvia really safe?
It is a question being asked more and more often. The usual answer is simple: Latvia is a member of NATO, we have allies, and we have defence plans.
But what if we’re asking the wrong question?
In this episode of No Malas Redzams, Māris examines the ideas of political philosopher and commentator Vlad Vexler and his discussion surrounding the so-called Putin’s Baltic File. Rather than focusing solely on military capability, this episode explores whether Russia’s real objective is something far more subtle: undermining NATO’s political unity, creating doubt, and weakening the resolve of democratic societies.
Could the greatest threat to Latvia come not from tanks crossing the border, but from information warfare, political division and a loss of public confidence?
This episode explores Putin’s worldview, authoritarian psychology, NATO, hybrid warfare, propaganda, and the resilience of democratic nations. More importantly, it asks what all of this means for Latvia and for every Latvian who values freedom.
This is not simply an episode about Russia.
It is an episode about Latvia.
About critical thinking.
About national resilience.
About the responsibility each generation has to defend democracy, not only with soldiers, but with informed and engaged citizens.
Because sometimes the most dangerous weapon isn’t a missile.
It’s an idea.
⸻
In This Episode
• What is Putin’s Baltic File? • Are we asking the wrong strategic questions? • Is NATO’s greatest strength military or political? • How information warfare undermines democratic societies • Understanding Putin’s worldview and authoritarian thinking • What all of this means for Latvia’s future
⸻
Keywords
Latvia, Baltic States, Baltic security, NATO, Putin, Putin’s Baltic File, Vlad Vexler, Russia, Ukraine, geopolitics, international relations, information warfare, hybrid warfare, propaganda, disinformation, democracy, authoritarianism, national security, Latvian politics, Hosted on Acast. See acas
More from No Malas Redzams
Latvia is facing some uncomfortable questions. Are political promises translating into meaningful action, and can the country's institutions maintain public confidence?
Latvia has voted, the ballots have been counted, and the political landscape has changed dramatically. But winning an election is one thing. Governing a country is another. In this episode of No Malas Redzams, Māris examines the extraordinary results of Latvia's 15th Saeima election, drawing on the 9 October 2026 weekly news briefing from Latvijas Sabiedriskais medijs (LSM). Apvienotais saraksts (United List) has emerged with 41 seats and 35.3% of the vote, while Latvia First and Sovereign Power/Alliance of New Latvians have secured significant parliamentary representation. New Unity has suffered a substantial setback, and the Union of Greens and Farmers has failed to cross the parliamentary threshold. With voter turnout at just 51.81%, the election raises important questions about political representation, public confidence, and Latvia's future direction. But the election is only the beginning. As Prime Minister Andris Kulbergs prepares to form a new government, Māris examines the coalition mathematics, possible political partnerships, and the challenge of turning campaign promises into effective government. And beyond the political manoeuvring, Latvia's everyday problems haven't disappeared.
With Latvia’s 15th Saeima election on 3 October 2026, this episode of No Malas Redzams examines what five political candidates actually said when speaking directly with Latvians in Australia and New Zealand.
ALVIS HERMANIS: KĀPĒC LATVIJA VIŅU KLAUSĀS? Līdz 15. Saeimas vēlēšanām palikušas 27 dienas.