
Show Notes
The Irish Question Mini Podcast Series — No. 2Who is being allocated social and affordable housing in Louth?In this episode, Elaine is joined by Fianna Fáil Councillor Shane McGuinness to discuss his request for a breakdown, by nationality, of people allocated social and affordable housing by Louth County Council.We discuss why this information matters, the need for transparency, and how elected councillors can hold the council accountable on behalf of the communities they represent.We also examine the powers of local councillors. Have they lost influence over the decisions affecting their constituents? Where does decision making power now sit and can councillors get the information they need to do their jobs?Shane outlines his efforts to get answers for the people he represents. Whatever our political differences, asking questions and seeking clear, reliable figures is an essential part of public accountability.Watch the conversation and share your thoughts below. Should every council publish a breakdown of housing allocations based on nationality ?Subscribe to The Irish Question for more conversations about the issues affecting Ireland and our communities.#TheIrishQuestion #ElaineMullally #ShaneMcGuinness #SocialHousing #AffordableHousing #Louth #Transparency #LocalGovernment 00:00 Meet Fianna Fáil Councillor Shane03:38 Who Really Controls Planning and Housing?09:45 Who’s Getting Social Housing? The Data Debate14:58 Immigration, Citizenship and Housing Priority20:53 Speaking Out: Would Shane Leave Fianna Fáil?25:38 The Presidential Election and Maria Steen
More from The Irish Question
Elaine Mullally sits down to have a conversation with Sall Grover, founder of the app Giggle, as she shares her journey navigating the contentious landscape of gender identity and women's rights. In a recent conversation, she reflects on her legal battles and the implications for women-only spaces.Birth of Giggle Sall Grover's journey began with the creation of Giggle, a social networking app designed exclusively for women. Grover describes it as a space where women could connect on various topics, from motherhood to politics. "It was a really lovely space... I was honored to run it," she shares. However, this endeavor led to unexpected legal challenges when a man attempted to access the app, prompting a significant legal battle that would test the limits of gender identity laws.Pivotal Legal BattleThe case, known as Tickle versus Giggle, became a landmark for gender identity discrimination. Grover faced accusations after removing a user who claimed to be a woman from the app. Despite her efforts, the Australian High Court recently declined to hear the case, leaving Grover to grapple with the financial and emotional fallout. "One of the positives that has come out of this case is that while we may have lost in the court of law, we have won... in the court of public opinion," she reflects.The Challenge of Advocacy In her discussion, Grover highlights the difficulty of maintaining hope in the face of systemic challenges. "Nothing prepares you for how much energy it takes to not become a really cynical person," she notes. Yet, she remains optimistic about the future of women's rights and the importance of public discourse. "We just need to make sure... that women were still included in the one piece of legislation in the country that was created for us."Address MisconceptionsGrover also addresses common misconceptions surrounding gender identity, particularly the narrative that sex is not binary. "Intersex is actually an incredibly outdated term... it doesn’t make you a third sex," she asserts. This underscores her belief in the importance of biological definitions in discussions about gender and rights.Call for ClarityThe conversation delves into the implications of current gender ideologies on societal norms, especially regarding children and education. Grover argues against the notion of fluid gender identity being taught in schools, emphasizing the need for clarity and protection of vulnerable groups. "There’s a fear among parents... that there is a serious push within our school system," she cautions.In the end, Grover’s journey is not just about one app or one legal case; it is about the broader struggle for women's rights in an evolving societal landscape. As she continues to advocate for clarity and women's spaces, her story serves as a poignant reminder of the ongoing conversation surrounding gender and identity. For a deeper dive into Sal Grover's insights and experiences, listen to the full episode. Chapters 00:00Introduction to Sal Grover and her background 02:13The creation of Giggle for Girls and its purpose 04:00The incident with the man claiming to be a woman on the app 06:06The legal case: Tickle versus Giggle and its significance 07:59The Australian High Court's decision and its implications 10:54The societal and legal challenges of gender identity laws 13:08The debate over intersex and sex binary concepts 16:08The influence of gender ideology on language and law1 9:04The importance of free speech and public opinion in societal change 21:58The role of activism and speaking out against gender laws 24:53The future of women's rights and societal debates 29:53Sal Grover's ongoing fight and call for support
Is Ireland learning the right lessons from France? Are trade unions demanding policies their own members will have to pay for? And why is supporting young families so far down the political agenda? Paul Treyvaud, Elaine Mullally and Nick Delehanty return for a packed episode of The Irish Question, covering immigration, Ireland’s demographic future, public-sector strikes, gender legislation, climate politics and more. The discussion opens with the tragic church accident in Ecuador before turning to footage of unrest in France. The panel debates integration, political leadership and social cohesion, asking what Ireland should learn from the experiences of other European countries. Nick then discusses the Irish Government’s long-term demographic projections: falling fertility, an ageing population and the role of migration in sustaining the workforce. The conversation turns to housing costs, the pressures facing young couples and whether government should do more to make starting a family affordable. Paul proposes redirecting resources towards parents, while Elaine argues that decades of housing and economic policy have undermined family life. A lively disagreement follows over public-sector strikes and the role of trade unions. Elaine makes the case for supporting nurses, teachers, prison officers and other workers seeking better pay. Nick challenges the unions’ wider spending and taxation agenda, discussing school meals, schoolbooks, childcare, welfare, carbon taxes and proposals affecting self-employed PRSI. Paul asks whether the self-employed should organise their own response, before the panel considers the relationship between public-sector pay and productivity. On immigration and accommodation, Elaine discusses a renewed planning application in Durrow, County Laois, and calls for ministers to engage directly with local residents. Nick questions whether changes to IPAS spending represent an overall reduction in costs or a shift towards larger centres and other accommodation budgets. The discussion also covers sentencing, freedom of expression, reporting restrictions and the panel’s concerns about equal treatment before the law. The hosts examine Ruth Coppinger’s proposed gender-recognition changes, including the proposed use of an “X” marker on official documents and birth certificates. They debate parental decision-making, children’s interests, the Government’s likely response and the wider influence of campaigning organisations and academia on policy. Internationally, the panel discusses British military-readiness warnings, the war in Ukraine and the possibility of negotiations involving Trump, Putin and Xi. They then turn to Mary Robinson’s comments on gender and climate leadership, Greta Thunberg’s activism, Irish climate targets and Nick’s argument that affordable energy deserves greater political priority.
Why is Ireland on strike — and is the taxpayer getting value for money? This week on The Irish Question, Nick Delehanty, Elaine Mullally and Paul Treyvaud debate public-sector pay, trade unions, council performance and whether better pay should come with greater accountability. We also discuss the confrontation with Ray D’Arcy, politicians’ salaries, court backlogs, RTÉ funding, social housing and the pressures on Ireland’s welfare state. Brendan Courtney’s comments spark a debate about double standards, while Brian Dowling and Arthur’s documentary raises questions about public scrutiny. Plus: Elaine’s new eyebrows, the hosts’ Instagram follower stats — and Paul’s popularity with older women! TIMESTAMPS 00:00 Welcome to The Irish Question 00:56 Public-sector strikes: pay demands and council performance 05:13 Trade unions, spending priorities and the taxpayer 08:49 The pay dispute: inflation and frontline workers 14:43 Government waste, benchmarking and spending transparency 17:25 The future of unions and working from home during strikes 19:58 Ray D’Arcy: questioning public figures or harassment? 25:51 Should politicians be paid more? 29:49 Elaine’s new eyebrows! 31:05 Instagram follower stats: who’s watching each host? 31:53 Court delays, overcrowded prisons and struggling services 36:21 Patrick O’Donovan, the culture card and RTÉ funding 37:52 The children’s hospital and political accountability 39:08 Ben Scallan, Gript and independent journalism 41:36 Social housing: who should qualify? 44:27 Welfare benefits and the incentive to work 47:56 Britain, France and Ireland’s reliance on corporation tax 51:09 Brendan Courtney’s comments and the double-standards debate 53:08 What is misandry? The Trinity College discussion 55:27 Brian Dowling and Arthur: parenting, surrogacy and public scrutiny 1:00:44 Global instability and emergency preparedness 1:03:38 Final thoughts and thanks to our listeners Subscribe, share the episode and tell us what you think: should public-sector pay increases be linked to performance? #TheIrishQuestion #IrishPolitics #PublicSector #Ireland
Are Ireland’s workers and small businesses paying more—and getting less? Eddie Punch returns to The Irish Question with Paul Treyvaud, Elaine Mullally and Nick Delehanty for a lively debate about citizenship, the cost of living and Ireland’s political direction. Recorded ahead of the Budget 2027 announcement, the panel discusses minimum wage increases, employer PRSI, rising business costs and whether government spending is delivering value. Eddie makes the case for lower taxes, a longer-term economic plan and stronger leadership on EU fuel taxes. Also up for discussion: multilingual housing and election guides, proposed citizenship changes, Garvaghy Road tensions, gender recognition proposals, developments in France and Spain, and Russian plague claims circulating online. Is Ireland rewarding hard work? Let us know in the comments. Subscribe to The Irish Question, share the episode and join the debate. CHAPTERS 00:00 Welcome back, Eddie Punch 01:02 Housing, welfare and multilingual election guides 05:41 Citizenship: should the waiting period increase? 13:32 Garvaghy Road and the United Ireland debate 17:10 Budget 2027: will workers actually be better off? 21:33 Minimum wage, employer PRSI and rising prices 24:55 Eddie Punch: tax, spending and Ireland’s missing strategy 34:26 Why do voters keep backing the same parties? 37:30 Small businesses under pressure—and why Nick closed his 39:17 Gender recognition and political priorities 45:18 France, Spain and Europe’s political divisions 51:55 EU rules, carbon taxes and the cost of energy 58:28 Russian plague claims: concern or hype? 1:01:26 Paul’s closing conspiracy theory and sign-off #TheIrishQuestion #EddiePunch #Budget2027 #IrishPolitics
Is Ireland making it impossible to run a small business—and giving its young people every reason to leave? Declan Ganley joins Nick Delehanty, Paul Treyvaud and Elaine Mullally for a fiery discussion about the pressure on Irish businesses, the cost of living and the future facing the next generation. Nick speaks candidly about closing his dog daycare business and responds to The Irish Times’ coverage. The panel debates minimum wage increases, VAT, employer costs and Ireland’s dependence on multinational tax revenues. Declan makes the case for rewarding hard work, entrepreneurship and risk-taking. Also on the agenda: the Ireland–Israel football controversy, pressure on players, the Garvaghy Road dispute and prospects for a united Ireland. The episode closes with a discussion of the developing RAF Fairford story and the questions surrounding it. CHAPTERS 00:00 Opening highlights 00:22 Welcome back, Declan Ganley 00:53 Ireland v Israel: should politics dictate sport? 04:02 Declan on political pressure and virtue signalling 10:21 Netanyahu, the UN and separating sport from government 12:58 Garvaghy Road: tensions and a united Ireland 19:45 Declan on reconciliation and common ground 25:50 Viewer support and the cost-of-living debate 27:13 Heating bills, budget promises and rising business costs 31:47 Why small businesses are running out of room 33:40 Nick on closing his business and The Irish Times’ coverage 38:34 Declan: “We need heroic risk taking” 43:27 Media coverage, housing statistics and business pressures 47:00 A message to business owners who are struggling 47:39 Young people, housing and emigration 53:40 Nick: where is Ireland’s vision for the future? 56:42 Rewarding work and giving young people reasons to stay 58:33 Home ownership and the broken social contract 59:22 Final topic: introducing the RAF Fairford story 1:00:05 RAF Fairford: reports, unanswered questions and speculation 1:01:52 Final thoughts and goodbye What would you change first to make Ireland a better place to build a business, own a home and raise a family? Let us know in the comments. Subscribe to The Irish Question, share the episode and hit Hype on YouTube to help more people find the conversation. #TheIrishQuestion #DeclanGanley #IrishPolitics #SmallBusiness #CostOfLiving