Show Notes
Have feedback on Critical Capital? Fill out our listener survey to let us know what topics and guests you’d like to hear next!
For decades, clean energy technology was framed as a moral imperative; a necessary strategy for saving the planet. Today, it’s just good business.
Thanks to rapid breakthroughs in generation and storage, the unit economics of cleantech have reached price parity with — and in some cases even undercut — fossil alternatives. But despite the incentives, this shift away from fossil fuels continues to hit roadblocks. Broken project finance stacks, risk-averse underwriters, and political gridlock have all slowed down innovation and deployment.
In this episode of Critical Capital, host Alfred Johnson sits down with two champions of the capital-centric, apolitical approach to climate investing: Lowercarbon Capital’s Chris Sacca (co-founder and managing partner) and Caie Kelley (general partner). Built on the heels of Sacca’s Lowercase Capital, a powerhouse tech fund in the 2010s, Lowercarbon has quickly emerged as one of the most dominant forces in cleantech. Today they manage over $2 billion in assets across the sector.
During this in-studio conversation recorded at New York Climate Week, Alfred, Chris, and Caie unpack why the industry is ditching the word "climate," how technical-minded founders can bridge the gap from lab-scale science and prototypes to deployment, and how to rebuild the capital stack needed to help this new era of cleantech reach its full potential.
Critical Capital is a co-production of Crux and Latitude Studios. Learn more about how Crux is financing the future of energy.
More from Critical Capital
If there’s one thing stakeholders in the energy sector can agree on, it’s that new infrastructure needs to get built faster and more reliably. A recent Crux study, for instance, found that federal permitting delays hamper clean energy projects for an average of six months; cancellations due to endless litigation are common.
The rush to build data centers has sparked an energy debate: will gas meet the growing demand or will clean firm power like nuclear step in? Nuclear has bipartisan support, new contracts from tech companies, and the capital to build. What it needs, according to Lara Pierpoint, is to be built on time and on budget with government support that lasts.
Home energy has spent most of a decade being sold as a premium product, priced at a margin homeowners would pay for something they wanted. Zach Dell says there’s a better way. He argues that electricity is a commodity, that the cheapest version is the best one, and that getting there means owning the supply chain that produces it.
American industry is building factories, mines, and grid hardware at a scale not attempted in decades, and the capital is there. But Erin Price-Wright says the cost of money no longer sets the return on an industrial project. It’s the time spent waiting on a regulator.
AI is still in the foothills of enterprise adoption, but the infrastructure buildout required to support it is already reshaping energy markets, capital allocation, and industrial policy. Data centers are driving demand for new generation and transmission, while billions of dollars flow into the hardware and software needed to train and run increasingly powerful models.