Show Notes
This one came straight out of a question in our Skool community, and it's the argument that splits every instructor Facebook group going: do you step in and be proactive, or do you let the pupil make the mistake and learn from it?
Phil's answer is that it's a false choice. Both are right. Both work. The whole thing hangs on when you use each one, and why — and on the fact that "learning from mistakes" and "learning from experience" are not the same thing, even though we use them as if they are.
It's also the first of the new shorter format: 10–15 minute episodes, one topic, no waffle.
What we cover:
- Why proactive coaching and experiential learning aren't opposites, and what actually decides which one you reach for - The trainer-in-the-back test: would you rather flounder for half an hour, or be redirected and shown what good feels like? - The same roundabout approach played two ways — coached proactively, and left to go wrong - How to get the thinking without the spoon-feeding, using the conversation before the event - The three places where letting them experiment is absolutely the right call - The pupil stuck in third at the lights — safe to let them stall, but is it the right thing to do?
Key takeaways:
- A positive experience they can reflect on beats a failure they have to recover from. Most pupils learn more from "that went well, why?" than from "that went badly, why?" - Stop calling it a mistake. In a car park it's an experiment. The goal isn't finishing the bay, the goal is learning how the car behaves — say that out loud to your pupil. - Do your thinking work before the event, not after it. Ask what might make them slow down on the approach, then let them meet it. Now it's something they worked out, not something you told them, and it sticks. - Deliberately explore the extremes in a safe space. Gas harder than you should — what happens? Barely any — what happens? Clutch up fast, then as slow as you can. Let them find the middle. - "It's safe" is not the same as "it's the right thing to do." If they're about to pull away in third with nothing behind you, you can let it happen — but ask whether the negative feeling earns its place. - The bit most instructors skip: if you do rescue them, still analyse it. Same conversation, same reasons, same depth as if they'd stalled in traffic. Rescuing and then moving on as though nothing happened is where the learning gets lost.
Mentioned in this episode:
- Our Skool community — where this week's question came from - 100+ hours of training content at www.inspireinstructortraining.co.uk
Want to train with Inspire? www.inspireinstructortraining.co.uk
More from Inspire Instructor Training Podcast
What is the examiner actually doing from the back seat on your Part 3? Diana sits down with Wayne Pinnington, who spent more than 20 years with DSA and DVSA as a car examiner, an ADI examiner, and then a test centre manager and LDTM, at one point running seven test centres and 22 staff between Wrexham and Buxton. He qualified as an ADI himself in 1999, and he is now back in the ADI world as a training consultant.
Diana opens this one with a confession. When she was qualifying she had done the reading, sat through the Zooms, learned the theory, and genuinely expected to be the bee's knees the moment she started teaching. She wasn't. Not because the theory was wrong, but because she had never actually done the job. The knowing and the doing turned out to be two completely different things, and finding that out knocked her belief in herself sideways.
Emma Fonnaland posted a list called "controversial things I do as a driving instructor". It did over 300,000 views and the comments filled with instructors telling her she was wrong. Phil read it, found he disagreed with almost none of it, and got her on the podcast to work through the list one item at a time.
Faults are the evidence. Needs are the cause. If you only ever fix the thing you saw, you will be fixing it again next week. This episode is about the gap between those two words, and why it decides more Part 3 and Standards Check results than almost anything else on the form. Competency 1 asks whether the trainer identified the pupil's learning goals and needs. Phil has never seen an instructor score a 1 there and still walk away with a pass, because when that one goes wrong everything after it is built on sand. You can deliver a genuinely good lesson on the wrong thing. A pupil stalls. A pupil misses a blind spot. A pupil sits in second when they should be in third. Every one of those is a moment, and every one of them has something underneath it. The job is to keep asking "yeah, but why" until you find what that something is. The difference matters more than it sounds. Fix the fault and you get a pupil who remembers not to do it, at least for the rest of the lesson. Fix the need and you get a pupil who understands, which lasts, and which fixes every other place that same gap was going to show up. Phil works through two examples in detail. The gear change, where "change up at 20mph" quietly teaches a learner a rule instead of a reason, and where the honest question to any instructor is whether they actually do that themselves. And the blind spot, where "I just forgot" is never the end of the conversation. Ask a pupil whether they forget to look before crossing the road and the answer is no, because they have evidence that one is dangerous and no evidence yet that the other one is. Which tells you the need. And it might not be the need you expected. Sometimes it is awareness of risk. Sometimes it is pure cognitive overload, a pupil with so much going on at their feet that there is no brain space left to look. Those two look identical from the passenger seat and they need completely different lessons. One more thing worth saying out loud: you do not need the fault to happen in order to find the need. You can spot it in something a pupil says, or simply from knowing where they are in their journey. Waiting for the mistake is a choice, not a requirement. What we cover What separates a fault from a need, and why the driving test trains all of us to see only the first one Standards Check and Part 3 competency 1, and why it quietly decides the rest of the sheet Why a pupil who remembers is fragile and a pupil who understands is not The gear change example: what "change at 20mph" actually teaches, and what it leaves out The blind spot example: why "I just forgot" is the start of the conversation, not the end Telling risk awareness apart from cognitive overload, and why the fix is different for each Finding a need before the fault ever happens
Guest Rachael Butler — Sales & Marketing Director, Intelligent Instructor 10 years at Intelligent Instructor (joined ~6 months after launch) Curates and organises content for Intelligent Instructor Plus Runs 24 online events per year (12 masterclasses + 12 member webinars) Heavily involved in national events: sponsorship/exhibitors and event delivery