Ep. 17 - Bowe v United States: Section 2244 And Second/Successive Section 2255 Petitions By Federal Prisoners

In episode 61 of the Supreme Court Opinions read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in Keathley v Buddy Ayers Construction. At issue in this case, assuming the doctrine of judicial estoppel applies in bankruptcy proceedings and inadvertence is an exception to such application, whether a court may limit its analysis of inadvertence to just two circumstances or must consider the totality of the circumstances. Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/608us2r48_k53m.pdf Linktree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread 0:00 Introduction/Syllabus 4:41 Justice Jackson, for the Court 18:32 Justice Thomas, concurring 25:55 Justice Sotomayor, concurring 35:13 Opinions of the host

In episode 60 of the Supreme Court Opinions read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in FS Credit Opportunities v Saba Capital Master Fund. At issue in this case, whether Section 47(b) of the ICA creates an implied right of action to sue for recission of a contract that allegedly violates the act. Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/608us2r47_m64o.pdf Linktree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread 0:00 Introduction/Syllabus 6:55 Justice Barrett, for the Court 29:35 Justice Kagan, dissenting 30:23 Justice Jackson, dissenting 1:04:32 Opinions of the host

In episode 59 of the Supreme Court Opinions read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in Abouammo v United States. At issue in this case, whether the trial venue for a violation of 18 USC §1519 (prohibiting falsification of documents with intent to obstruct federal investigations) must be the district where the document falsification occurred or may also be the district where the contemplated federal investigation takes place. Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/608us2r46_2c8f.pdf Linktree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread 0:00 Introduction/Syllabus 6:17 Justice Kagan, for the Court 22:26 Opinions of the host

In episode 58 of the Supreme Court Opinions read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA v Amarin Pharma. Hikma Pharmaceuticals is a generic drug manufacturer and makes a generic druc equivalent to Amarin Pharma's drug, Vascepa. Amarin sued Hikma, alleging a number of its statements induced medical providers to violate its method of use patents by prescribing the generic for patented uses. At issue in this case, whether Amarin's claim plausibly alleges induced infringement and survives a motion to dismiss. Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/608us2r45_i4dk.pdf Linktree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread 0:00 Introduction/Syllabus 6:37 Justice Jackson, for the Court 29:43 Opinions of the host

In episode 57 of the Supreme Court Opinions read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in Sripetch v SEC. At issue in this case, whether the SEC must show pecuniary loss to victims of violations of securities laws before a court may grant it a disgorgement award. Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/608us2r44_j42l.pdf Linktree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread 0:00 Introduction/Syllabus 5:26 Justice Gorsuch, for the Court 27:24 Justice Thomas, concurring 43:01 Opinions of the host