
Factors affecting infant gut microbiota development, with Prof. Christopher Stewart PhD
The Science, Microbes & Health PodcastShow Notes
This episode features Prof. Christopher Stewart PhD from Newcastle University (UK), speaking about the factors affecting gut microbiota development in both non-preterm and preterm infants. Prof. Stewart started in the field of environmental microbial ecology and then came to work in human microbiome research. He was involved in the landmark TEDDY study, which aimed to find gut microbial markers of type 1 diabetes (T1D). Although no microbial triggers of T1D were identified, the study found a number of factors that impact gut microbiome development: for example, sex, geographical location, and living with furry animals. Still, most of the variation seen in the infant gut microbiota remains unaccounted for. He noted that infants are exposed to both vaginal and gastrointestinal microorganisms during vaginal birth. In C-section-born infants, seeding of the maternal vaginal and gut microbiota may be promising, but current methods are imprecise and safety has not been established. Furthermore, diet takes over as a primary driver of gut microbiota a few weeks after birth. Prof. Stewart talked about human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs), well known to be utilized by bifidobacteria in the infant gut. His lab recently published the surprising finding that Clostridium species can also utilize HMOs – and while at first this was thought to be detrimental for the infant, further investigation showed that the HMO-utilizing Clostridium may lack the genes for producing specific toxins and end up being protective for the infant gut. Together, the microbial community in the gut may use the full suite of HMO substrates reaching the infant gut. Preterm infants are a population that needs more attention. Antibiotics affect their gut microbiomes – often in a negative way, but for the overall benefit of the baby. His lab is currently funded to study how probiotics affect the preterm infant gut microbiota, and to find strategies for more personalized approaches to administering probiotics in this population.
Episode abbreviations and links:
TEDDY study, revealing factors affecting gut microbiota development between 3 and 46 months of age: Temporal development of the gut microbiome in early childhood from the TEDDY study
Study on how Clostridium species utilize HMOs: Clostridia from preterm infants metabolize human milk oligosaccharides to suppress pathobionts and modulate intestinal function in organoids
Study on how NEC risk is linked with HMOs: Human milk oligosaccharide DSLNT and gut microbiome in preterm infants predicts necrotising enterocolitis
Publication on how probiotics impact the gut microbiota in preterm infants: Strain-specific impacts of probiotics are a significant driver of gut microbiome development in very preterm infants
Some similar results have come from the CHILD Cohort Study, described here
Find Prof. Stewart on LinkedIn, and learn more about his research on this website
About Prof. Christopher Stewart:
Professor Christopher Stewart is an internationally recognised leader in human microbiome research. He earned his PhD in Microbial Ecology from Northumbria University (UK), followed by postdoctoral training at Baylor College of Medicine (Houston, Texas), before establishing his research group at Newcastle University in 2018.
His pioneering work focuses on microbial-host interactions in the gut, particularly in infants born extremely premature (<32 weeks gestation). His lab integrates multi-omic analyses of clinical samples with experimental microbiology and organoid co-culture systems to uncover mechanisms of microbial influence on early-life development. More recently, he has expanded his research to support a UK-wide initiative investigating microbiome-based predictors of therapeutic response in adult inflammatory bowel disease.
Professor Stewart has published over 140 peer-reviewed articles in leading journals, contributing to the discovery of novel biomarkers and targeted microbiome-based interventions. He has receiv
More from The Science, Microbes & Health Podcast
This episode features Prof. Christophe Courtin from KU Leuven (Belgium), speaking about the European HealthFerm initiative. HealthFerm began in September 2022 and brought together multiple institutions and companies to advance the project with a grant of 30 million Euros. The main aim of the project was to improve public acceptance of plant-based foods through fermentation. A citizen science component of the project involved gathering fermented food samples from all over Europe, both home fermenters and small bakeries, to analyze the microorganisms. The researchers received over 650 sourdough starter samples and around 200 other fermented foods samples; from these, they identified some new species that still need to be named. Another part of the project involved a clinical trial on how the body responds if short-chain fatty acids are released in the small intestine versus in the colon. They found that small intestinal release increased GLP-1 levels more than PYY; the opposite happened with colonic release. Another study in the project compared oat to fermented oat, and found that the fermentation changed the fiber (degree of polymerization), and also led to positive health effects. Prof. Courtin says the potential for future research in this area is to find out how to add nutritional benefits through fermentation (for example, vitamin B12 in plant-based foods), as well as how to change the fiber profile in a food to yield specific health benefits.
This episode features Dr. Mingyang Song ScD from Harvard University (USA), speaking about epidemiological evidence connecting the gut microbiota to colorectal cancer (CRC) and whether the evidence supports the gut microbiota as a ‘driver’ or a ‘passenger. Dr. Song explains how he and colleagues studied the gut microbiome in a subset of people from the Nurses’ Health Study. It’s known that adenoma removal reduces CRC risk, but doesn’t eliminate it. Does the gut microbiome contribute to this remaining risk? The researchers found that many years after adenoma removal, individuals had a different gut microbiota compared with healthy controls, indicating that the microbiome profile is not fully restored by adenoma removal. People with past adenoma removal had a gut microbiota that overlapped with that of current CRC patients, with the caveat that lots of heterogeneity was observed. Diet and lifestyle also correlate with both CRC development and gut microbiome composition, with some of the main factors reducing CRC risk being dietary fiber, fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and calcium. These and other healthy lifestyle factors were associated with fewer of the gut microbial members typically seen in CRC. Next, prospective studies are needed to determine whether gut microbiota changes truly precede CRC and independently contribute to risk. This line of research could also lead to a more tailored approach to CRC screening, with risk factors being taken into account.
This episode features Prof. Alberto Martin from University of Toronto (Canada), speaking about the molecular mechanisms by which certain bacteria – namely, pks+ E. coli – influence colorectal cancer development. pks+ E. coli secretes a toxin that causes DNA damage; likely its purpose is to keep other microorganisms in check, but it appears to have the effect of promoting colorectal cancer. A low-fiber diet starves mucolytic bacteria, reducing the mucus layer in the gut and allowing pks+ E. coli to come into contact with the colonic epithelial cells, where they secrete the toxin that causes DNA damage. Gut inflammation also factors in, because these bacteria thrive in an inflammatory environment. Interestingly, in looking at the geographic distribution of this microorganism in people around the world, its presence correlates with colorectal cancer rates. Prof. Martin’s lab has clinical trials planned to explore this connection, and other groups are looking at therapies to reduce this microorganism in the gut.
This episode features Dr. Georg Zeller PhD from Leiden University Medical Center (the Netherlands), speaking about gut microbiome signatures of colorectal cancer across global populations. An early study Dr. Zeller completed in Peer Bork’s lab suggested that the gut microbiomes of people with colorectal cancer are distinct from controls. This signature, as well as work on the tumor microbiome, all pointed toward Fusobacterium as particularly important. Subsequent studies exploring this idea show wide variation in geography and methods. Accounting for these factors, meta-analyses have confirmed several gut microbiome characteristics that are enriched in colorectal cancer across the global population. Dr. Zeller was interested to see that bile acid metabolism is consistently enriched in the cancer metagenome. The taxonomic profile, however, appears better than the functional profile in distinguishing colorectal cancer from control samples. He emphasizes the importance of linking his insights from bioinformatic efforts to the mechanistic work being done. Initially he was hopeful that a gut microbiome diagnostic could be developed, but currently the highest achievable AUC for the classification models is around 0.85 or 0.9, which may not be adequate for enhancing current clinical tools. The possibility remains for a gut microbiome test to complement existing diagnostics. The most promising area may be targeted gut microbiome modulation for prevention of colorectal cancer, perhaps through diet. His group is also exploring the gut microbiome for early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer, possibly by combining fecal markers with other diagnostic tools.
This episode features Prof. Cynthia L. Sears, MD from the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and the Bloomberg School of Public Health (USA), speaking about both biofilms and specific gut microorganisms that may contribute to colorectal cancer development. Initially, Prof. Sears became interested in enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis in connection with colon cancer. Further investigation found complex biofilms with multiple bacteria fixed to the surface of the tumor. The biofilms were shown to be oncogenic, and they reassembled very quickly after antibiotic treatment. Interestingly, the biofilms were found to have C. difficile. A subset of the biofilms have a dominant amount of Fusobacterium, and the latest work shows that these bacteria are associated with advancing cancer, stage 2 or beyond. These bacteria and/or biofilms don’t necessarily trigger the onset of mutations that lead to colon cancer, but they accelerate tumor growth. Over time, the gut microbiota may be perturbed in various ways (including by antibiotics), allowing the organisms to create a niche for themselves that ultimately harms the colonic epithelial cells. Prof. Sears is optimistic about prevention strategies for colorectal cancer, such as a tool that helps predict risk in younger populations. Targeted prebiotics, too, show promise for encouraging the growth of beneficial bacteria that prevent the oncogenic species from finding a niche.