Show Notes
Many people, if not most, appear to decide upon their future when they’re fairly young. As teenagers, or perhaps even as children, they envision the life they wish to have, and they begin working toward it, choosing their education, and finding a suitable mate. Others need more time. They develop a sense of what their lives are about by the time they’re in their twenties, thirties, or forties, and some even later. Few never quite figure out what they were supposed to be doing in life. But one thing that saddens me to hear is the story of an old man who merely went along with everything going on around him. A man who never once pointed at the horizon to say, “That’s where I’m going.” These men live what I call lost lives, for they often regret their chosen course, or rather, the path chosen for them by others. Allowing anyone anywhere to determine the outcome of one’s life, of course, is a sin against living. You weren’t put on Earth to be a slave. We’re not paper bags floating away in the wind, wherever destiny takes us. No, destiny, like free will, is something we possess within ourselves. The downhill skier uses gravity to navigate his way, and so do people use free will to navigate their lives. When it comes to destiny, it becomes a group effort. We cannot shape the future alone, but together with the people to whom we belong, we forge nations. Nations, then, may use destiny as a force to shape their future. The word ‘nation’ comes from natio and refers to a people of a shared birth. Nationalism is the politics that promotes the right conditions for such a people of a shared birth. Nations flow from the collective racial soul, a primordial river, from which also each family and each individual is an offshoot. It should come as no surprise that people who call themselves anti-racist or globalist also hate the biological family, for the family represents a branch of the ancestral river that can be traced back all the way to the source. They also hate small towns, for the society of familiar faces allows for individuals to keep in touch with relatives. No, the globalist warmonger wants to atomize all of us into atomic individuals, lost in a sea of big city madness where inflated egos keep some alive, while others drown. That way, people can be shipped around the world as though they were housed in shipping containers. To each individual his metal box. This dystopian idea of transporting workers around the world in shipping containers, to take them to wherever in the world their labor is needed, depending on their skill and education, was the topic of a commercial advertising in my home country of the Netherlands years ago. That disturbing fantasy never materialized, but it shows how globalists and their bankers think about you and I. We are just bags of sand to them. When Martin Luther posted his 95 Theses, he meant to reform Christianity, which was Catholicism, not to fracture it into a thousand new sects. This fragmentation of Christianity soon required state authority to help police sectarian violence. And so the idea of separation of Church and State was born. The fragmented nature of society now called for tolerance of each other’s viewpoints, and for individual rights. The new individualism led to the capitalist exploitation that forces people to work more hours for increasingly less life. Money became the stand-in for God. Work became a replacement for family. Relentless consumerism, exemplified by attics full of unopened stuff, however, doesn’t make up for the loss of destiny. We used to live as families. In old Germany, grandparents used to live with their children and grandchildren in the same house. It were the financial experts of the rising cities who, some 200 years ago, figured out they could control a nation’s destiny by selling each couple, if not each individual, a mortgage for a smaller house, then an apartment, then a studio, and then a pod in a place occupied by twenty people, though none of them related
More from The Great Johannes Podcast
In this livestreamed discussion, I went over several concepts relating to White men as the world’s scapegoats. And that—though we cannot change the role—we can stop playing it. By focusing on what we still can do for ourselves, we win status and competence on our own terms. That is something society cannot prevent us from doing. So, we escape the scapegoat role by refusing to argue for better treatment. Instead, we start treating ourselves right.
It turns out that people’s sense of race and language develops simultaneously. Meaning, a White American child would expect other White children to speak their language. But if they meet a brown child who speak proper American English, they will prefer the brown child to another White child who can’t speak English well. Elites, therefore, united behind their shared accents and dialects, usually the language of the power elite. However, rural people cannot unite behind a single language, since they speak wildly different dialects. And so, rural resisters must unite themselves behind race and religion.
In short, Epstein was working for the Rothschilds. He was a basic occultist working for Satanists. Their goal is to use technology to erase human religiousness. The Bill Gates jibby-jab may have been an attempt to chemically erase religiosity in some people. Elites hate Christianity, especially the patriarchal branch, because it guarantees people a free will. And elites rather see people as happy servants, bred to be slaves.
Nearly every Western nation is suffering an aging population, mass immigration, political corruption, an affordable housing crisis, and an anti-White media. Diversity is called a strength, or has it really been the result of our weakness in other domains? The Western world initially believed it could relegate Chinese industry into a position of eternal supplier to our needs. Then it appeared that China might win top dog position in the economic hierarchy of national rankings. In response, Western elites decided that we needed to get India to side with the West, at all cost. But how could we convince the massive population of India to fight with us against China? This, our ruling classes believed, could be achieved through a massive transfer wealth, namely to buy loyalty. India today is the number one recipient of remittances coming out of the USA. Remember Christmas 2024 when even Elon Musk started calling white people retarded if they didn’t like the h1b visa scam that was bringing in hundreds of thousands if not millions of Indians into the USA? His concern must have been that China wasn’t going to need any more Teslas and that Tesla was going to need the Indian market to both sell Tesla cars to and to have them produced there more cheaply. Perhaps the idea was to get to China and India to compete on price for Western consumer demands. So we learned that we can never trust our billionaire overclass’ interests because their interests are global and ours are local and national. The average person living in the West does not live globally but lives nationally at best, and how many people do you know who never even leave their local neighborhood because they work and study and go out in the same nearby streets? The needs of globalism have become a threat to our national survival. We are no longer investing in rearing children of our own because our foreign policy priorities are that we first house Indian or Somali immigrants for geopolitical reasons. A part of Somalia called Somaliland, for example, is a piece of real estate necessary for the defense of international trade routes along the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden. And so it seems that the Somali daycare scam in the state of Minnesota under the supervision of former vice presidential candidate Tim waltz is most definitely a dark money scheme to funnel U.S. taxpayer funds to illicit foreign organizations. Chinese strategists however foresee a totally different outcome. They believe that China will take the number one position as the world’s next only superpower. They believe that the U.S. and India will ultimately be competing against each other for second and third place positions. If this indeed were the outcome, then the USA will no longer be able to fund the defense of Israel, in which case that piece of real estate will fall into the hands of Arabs backed by China. No, I don’t support Israel or its regime. And no, I also don’t support China taking over the territory. But if China did take over the Middle East, it would then rule all international trade. And then, in such a scenario, what is to become of Europe? Already the USA seems incapable of defending Europe under its NATO pact. Of course Europe shouldn’t have to rely on defenses paid for by the USA. Europe should rather become independent. Europe, today, is importing over 60% of its energy needs from outside of the EU bloc. How can Europe ever be independent? For starters, we could reduce our surplus population. What I personally foresee is that the economic wealth of the West is going to wither away, that the Western military presence around the world will have to be largely withdrawn, and that we will once again realize that our most precious assets are our own people living on their own land. But there is a serious risk of subjugation by foreign enemies. Our land will require heavy defenses in the near future, since Europe is surrounded by its Islamic enemies and even the Russian leaders are dreaming of annexing
Thanks to TikTok’s Daniel Clark (who gets banned often), Johannes (English), and Seth. Note that Seth isn’t a member of the Vryburger Beweging, but added his comments about New Jersey and the situation in the USA. We spoke at length about the situation in South Africa, and about how to organize successfully against the “Woke Rainbow” governments. A great insight was delivered by South African Johannes, namely that “normie” White people tend to arrive at the same conclusions once they’ve had the same experiences.