
Show Notes
Welcome Back Rheumatology Fans, I have previously commented that “weight loss for Osteoarthritis is the best bang-for-buck treatment we have currently”: This slide occasionally gets me in hot water with other Physio’s and MSK Professionals but that doesn’t matter to me really, I stand by it and if anything I am becoming more wedded to this stance. Anyway… Ben Steele-Turner is an unstoppable force of Osteoarthritis information and dietary advice. I have shameless updated much of my teaching based on his answers to my questions. NOW HE IS PUBLISHING AS PART OF HIS PhD. His first article is open access HERE. I have written a short summary below but please click on the link and read the article in full. Physiotherapist-Led Weight Management for People with Osteoarthritis This scoping review provides the most comprehensive overview to date of how weight management (WM) is currently understood, implemented, and perceived within physiotherapist-led care for people with osteoarthritis (OA). With 79 records included across 22 countries, the review highlights substantial variability in practice, persistent uncertainty around scope of practice, and a widespread need for improved training and confidence among physiotherapists. Why Weight Management Matters in OAThe evidence linking excess bodyweight to OA (particularly knee OA) is robust. Weight loss of as little as 7% can reduce pain, while more significant reductions can slow structural progression and reduce joint replacement risk. Despite strong guideline recommendations, weight management remains underprovided in OA care. Physiotherapists, who frequently work with people with OA and often have longer consultation times, may be well placed to address this gap. Current Practice: Highly Variable and Often MinimalAcross studies, the proportion of physiotherapists who reported including weight management ranged from very high (over 80% in some survey responses) to extremely low when actual practice was audited. For example, only 12% of individuals with knee OA in one prospective study reported receiving any weight management support during physiotherapy, and note audits showed weight management discussions documented in only about 10% of encounters. People with OA also consistently reported that weight management was either not addressed or addressed only superficially. Scope of PracticePhysiotherapists and people with OA expressed mixed views about whether weight management should fall within physiotherapy’s remit. Many clinicians felt it sat outside traditional physiotherapy roles, often preferring referral to dietitians (admittedly I do this!). However, people with OA who participated in a physiotherapist-led diet-plus-exercise trial reported positive perceptions, especially when physiotherapists had received additional training. This suggests that scope-of-practice concerns may be alleviated when physiotherapists feel more adequately prepared. Confidence and SkillsA recurring theme across the literature is discomfort discussing weight. Physiotherapists commonly feared damaging rapport, felt unsure how to raise weight sensitively, or believed that effective weight management strategies were outside their expertise. Many reported feeling untrained in nutrition or behavioural counselling, and physiotherapy students also identified weight management as a major skill gap. These concerns were echoed by people with OA, who sensed that physiotherapists had limited time and limited practical advice to offer. When weight management was addressed, it was often brief, generic, and lacking actionable support. Education Changes PracticePromisingly, trials of targeted weight management education, such as e-learning modules or structured upskilling programmes, showed clear improvements in physiotherapists’ confidence, knowledge, and attitudes. One physiotherapist-led intervention combining exercise with a structured very low-energy diet yielded clinically significant weight loss and symptom improveme
More from Rheumatology.Physio Podcast
This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit rheumatologyphysio.substack.com
This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit rheumatologyphysio.substack.com
Welcome Back Rheumatology Fans, Ooof this is going to rattle some cages. Synopsis below but the best of this is watching the video. A recent news report about a woman with rheumatoid arthritis who was convicted of benefit fraud caught my attention. The case involved footage of her participating in activities including gym classes and running events despite having previously reported substantial limitations in her day-to-day function. I don’t know enough about the individual circumstances to comment on whether the judgement was appropriate. In fact, the reported offence appears to relate specifically to failing to notify the Department for Work and Pensions of a change in circumstances. But the story raises a broader issue that is highly relevant to people living with inflammatory arthritis and the clinicians treating them. Being physically active does not necessarily mean someone is not disabled. Rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis and other long-term inflammatory diseases can be enormously variable. Symptoms may fluctuate over time, treatments can substantially improve function, and limitations in one activity do not necessarily predict someone’s ability to perform another. Exercise also forms an important part of rehabilitation. I might see someone who currently cannot run, play tennis or golf because their inflammatory arthritis is poorly controlled. Following improvements in medication and a structured rehabilitation programme, one of our explicit treatment goals might be to return them to those activities. For another person, the goal might simply be getting upstairs more comfortably. To achieve that, we may use relatively demanding strengthening exercises in a gym. Seeing that person performing a squat or leg press tells you very little, in isolation, about how easily they can negotiate their stairs later that day. That distinction matters. We should not create an environment where people receiving appropriate financial support become frightened of exercising because they worry that being seen in a gym, lifting weights or participating in sport could somehow be interpreted as evidence that they are no longer disabled. From a clinical perspective, I want people with inflammatory arthritis to be as active as their condition, preferences and circumstances allow. Where possible, that includes meeting general physical activity recommendations and incorporating cardiovascular and resistance exercise. There are good reasons for doing so. Maintaining physical activity can help protect muscle and bone, improve cardiovascular health and support broader long-term health outcomes. For some patients, returning to demanding exercise is itself a major marker of successful treatment. None of this means that changes in someone’s circumstances should not be reported where required. That is a separate issue. The important point is that exercise capacity and disability are not opposites. A person can exercise and still experience meaningful restrictions from inflammatory disease. They can also improve dramatically with treatment while continuing to have limitations elsewhere. As clinicians, we should be encouraging people towards greater function—not inadvertently giving them another reason to be afraid of achieving it.
This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit rheumatologyphysio.substack.com
This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit rheumatologyphysio.substack.com