Show Notes
How does the law balance the rights of women to access safe and legal abortions with the right to free speech and protest?
For over twenty years anti-abortion protesters have picketed abortion clinics around Australia. To combat this targeted harassment of women seeking safe and legal abortions, state governments have passed ‘safe access zone’ laws which create an exclusion zone around abortion clinics which protestors cannot enter.
Anti-abortionists argue these laws limit their free speech. Supporters of safe access zones argue these laws are vital to ensure the safety of women seeking health care.
When this law was challenged by anti-abortion protesters who had breached the exclusion zones, the High Court was faced with a major balancing act.
Storytellers - Dr Tania Penovic, Faculty of Law, Monash University - Dr Caroline Henckels, Faculty of Law, Monash University
Hosts - Dr Melissa Castan & James Pattison
Further reading
- Explainer: what are abortion clinic safe-access zones and where do they exist in Australia? (https://theconversation.com/explainer-what-are-abortion-clinic-safe-access-zones-and-where-do-they-exist-in-australia-98175)
- High Court delivers landmark ruling validating abortion clinic ‘safe access zones’ (https://theconversation.com/high-court-delivers-landmark-ruling-validating-abortion-clinic-safe-access-zones-115062)
Music in this episode: - Lee Rosevere - ‘Start the Day’ - Lee Rosevere - ‘Waiting For the Moment That Never Comes’
Read the transcript. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
More from Just Cases
Outrage over a federal government decision to put religious chaplains in government schools made headlines at the time for being a fight over the separation of church and state. But the real High Court case was about much more - and it has the potential to upend the way the entire federal government functions.
1968 seems a lifetime ago. It was a defining year of the 20th century. 1968 is also the year that a Japanese professional boxer was sentenced to death for murder. Remarkably, he remains on death row to this day. The case of Iwao Hakamada has exposed questionable police practices, a forced confession and a bombshell claim from one of the judges who sentenced him.
A newly-elected Australian government is concerned about a growing Communist influence in Australia. The scene is set for a major High Court case.
What is the rule of law? What is executive power? How do we hold power to account? Are our legal institutions and protections still relevant these days?
How does Australian law protect the beliefs and religious practices of witches, conjurers and fortune-tellers? A High Court case from the 1930s could provide the answers.