Show Notes
Hosts Chelsea and Georgia explore Issue #72 of The Intersect newsletter, examining what we lose when systems become too efficient. The episode covers BAFTA's new 'human creativity' awards that explicitly exclude AI avatars, the opportunity hidden in our inability to distinguish real from AI photos, and an AI experiment that produced 'visual elevator music.' They discuss the Recursive Aesthetic Paradox where AI feeding on itself creates bland homogenization, Maria Popova's revelation about blue existing through absence, and the Cosmos exhibition merging art with scientific processes. The conversation concludes with the Berlinale controversy over political neutrality in arts funding, questioning whether cultural institutions can maintain independence when reliant on government and corporate money. Throughout, the hosts explore how understanding both art and technology benefits creators and technologists alike.
More from The Intersect of Tech and Art
The companion podcast to Issue No.90 of The Intersect, with a twist: this time the curator, Juergen, is the one being interviewed rather than discussed. The animating question is what we gave up when our first reflex became suspicion instead of delight, and who pays the fine when proof lands on the artist and arrives too late. Candid, unresolved, and worth sitting with before you read the full issue.
The companion podcast to Issue No.89 of The Intersect, with a twist: this week the curator is the one being interviewed, answering in his own voice rather than being discussed. The animating question is whether the loudest creative protest only ever reaches the already convinced, while the quietest work slips inside a trusted frame and tilts it from within. He keeps circling the gap between who a work is made for and who it actually finds, and he is honest that he cannot always close it.
The companion podcast to Issue No.88 of The Intersect, with a twist: this time the curator, Juergen, is the one being interviewed rather than discussed. He answers for a title he has to defend, and for the question underneath it: when machines can make anything in seconds, why would anyone choose the hardest, silliest path on purpose? A conversation about stubbornness, craft, and whether all of this is charming or quietly poignant.
The companion podcast to Issue No.87 of The Intersect, in a different shape this time: rather than the usual two-host conversation, the host interviews the curator, who speaks in his own voice about the issue and his own experience. The animating question: once images stopped describing the world and started acting on it, what are we actually still looking at, and can art make those tools tell the truth again? Forward-pointing and candid, it sends you back to the newsletter for the full picture.
The companion podcast to Issue No.86 of The Intersect. Chelsea and Georgia wrestle with a quietly unsettling question: when did our digital work become more fragile than a photographer's glass plate, and is the infrastructure we've handed artists even capable of saving it? A conversation about permanence as a choice you design, not a promise the cloud keeps for you.