#112 | Left Out in the Cold – Episode 3: Housing Available But Not Accessible
CIAJ In All Fairness - ICAJ En toute justiceShow Notes
Guaranteeing the right to housing on its own misses a key overlapping concern: whether the housing is actually accessible. Despite the federal government's goal of achieving a barrier-free Canada by 2040, many people continue to face barriers in securing housing that meets their accessibility needs and are twice as likely to live in core housing need. In the third episode of this series, host Sarah Rowe is joined by Marie-Josée Houle, Canada's first Federal Housing Advocate, and Stephanie Chipeur, who holds the Azrieli Accelerator Professorship in Law & Disability Policy at the University of Calgary's Faculty of Law and the School of Public Policy. Together, they discuss the right to adequate housing that is accessible, adaptable, and visitable for people with disabilities, seniors, and other equity-deserving groups.
Guests Stephanie Chipeur, Assistant Professor, Faculty of Law & School of Public Policy, University of Calgary Marie-Josée Houle, Federal Housing Advocate Host Sarah Rowe, Legal Counsel, Canadian Institute for the Administration of Justice (CIAJ)
More from CIAJ In All Fairness - ICAJ En toute justice
Comment répondre au préjudice causé par un crime? En complément du processus criminel traditionnel, la justice réparatrice propose une approche centrée sur les personnes touchées, leurs besoins et la réparation des torts. Dans cet épisode de la série « Dans l'angle mort », l'honorable juge Simon Ruel, de la Cour d'appel du Québec, s'entretient avec l'honorable juge Anna Loparco, de la Cour du Banc du Roi de l'Alberta. Forte de son expérience à la tête du Comité de justice réparatrice de l'Alberta, qu'elle a cofondé, et de son enseignement sur le sujet, la juge Loparco explore avec lui le concept de justice réparatrice et sa place dans le système de justice criminelle au Canada, notamment depuis les récentes modifications au Code criminel. Ils abordent aussi ses avantages, ses limites et les mythes qui l'entourent, ainsi que le rôle des juges, des procureurs et des avocats de la défense. Cet épisode est la version française de l'épisode 6 de la série « Dans l'angle mort » : La justice réparatrice au Canada : les leçons de l'Alberta (en anglais).
The justice system is confusing for most individuals brought before it. From applications to adjournments to delays, an individual's life is on hold while they endure overly long proceedings. And what happens when the decision is wrong? What can the court do to address a breach of an individual's right to security of the person and psychological integrity? In this episode, host Sarah Rowe is joined by Julie-Ann Kirkpatrick, retired defence lawyer and Doctoral Candidate at Carleton University, to discuss the use of apologies by courts to repair or achieve justice. The discussion focuses on Julie's doctoral research, namely, when and how an apology could be given as a restorative remedy under s. 24(1) of the Charter. RELATED DOCUMENTATION: https://ciaj-icaj.ca/en/podcasts/an-apology-as-a-restorative-remedy/
The traditional model of Canadian criminal law is a state-centred adversarial process designed to punish, deter, or rehabilitate. But once the trial is over and the sentence is imposed, has justice truly addressed the harm caused by crime? Restorative justice approaches ask different questions: Who has been harmed? What do they need? And who is responsible for addressing those needs, repairing the harm, or restoring relationships? In this 6th episode of the series "In the Blind Spot," the Honourable Justice Simon Ruel, of the Court of Appeal of Quebec, speaks with the Honourable Deputy Chief Justice Joanne Durant and the Honourable Justice Michelle Christopher, both of the Alberta Court of Justice, and the Honourable Justice Anna Loparco, of the Court of King's Bench of Alberta. Together, they discuss the principles and benefits of restorative approaches in the legal system, the myths surrounding them, and the roles of judges, prosecutors, and defence counsel. The three guests also share what they have learned from Alberta's Restorative Justice Project, launched in 2022.
Can a community-led program change the course of a young person's life — before the justice system ever has to? In this episode, Host Laken Tucker (CIAJ's 2026 Summer Law Student Intern) speaks with Christina Harper (Program Coordinator, Restorative Justice Program, BGC Okanagan) about how the program supports youth ages 12 to 24 through a collaborative model involving the RCMP, local schools, community business partners, and victims. Christina shares how the program came to be, how it's grown, and the outcomes it's producing on the ground — from volunteer training to participant feedback and reoffending trends. This conversation offers a grounded look at how restorative justice functions in practice — and a hopeful case study for communities of any size looking to build something similar. Guest Christina Harper, Program Coordinator, Restorative Justice Program, BGC Okanagan Host Laken Tucker, CIAJ 2026 Summer Law Intern; JD Candidate, Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University
Judicial independence is essential to democracy and the rule of law. But how can judges and lawyers remain independent when they face political pressure, intimidation, or attacks on their legitimacy? In this 5th episode of the series "In the Blind Spot," the Honourable Justice Simon Ruel speaks with Margaret L. Satterthwaite, United Nations Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers, about the threats facing justice systems worldwide and the safeguards needed to protect them. Their conversation highlights why judicial independence is not only a concern for legal professionals, but a fundamental protection for everyone.