
Show Notes
In this episode of Crash Course Sara Murawski en Rodrigo Fernandez discuss Dependency Theory with Ingrid Kvangraven. How does dependency theory help us to formulate different answers to the problems developing countries face today. We try to understand what it is and why it has been lost in debates on the global south, after being dominant in the 70s and 80s. Since the IMF and the world bank imposed their neo-liberal adjustment programs, development has become synonymous with attracting foreign direct investments (FDI) from multinational corporations. In this dominant worldview, developing countries need to focus on implementing policies (‘reforms’) that attract FDI at all cost. Success can be achieved by following the prescribed market-oriented changes that convert economic assets and activities in a potential tradable financial asset. Dependency theory on the other hand departs from the opposite perspective. In this approach ‘underdevelopment’ is the result of a specific type of integration in a capitalist global economy that is uneven. “Core countries benefit from the global system at the expense of periphery countries, which face structural barriers that make it difficult, if not impossible, for them to develop in the same way that the core countries did.”
-
About Crash Course Economics Crash Course is a platform designed to open up debate on how we can move out of the current crisis and make the necessary steps towards achieving social, economic, ecological and regenerative justice.
Crash Course is inviting global experts to break down complex issues in lay terms and make them accessible to all so that we can understand how to shape our economic system for a just recovery and future.
Website: https://crashcourseeconomics.org/ Newsletter: http://eepurl.com/g54ZMD Podcast: http://podcast.crashcourseeconomics.org/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/CrashEconomics Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Crash-Course-113416687059951
More from Crash Course Economics
During the pandemic and its aftermath, the world witnessed a revival of new narratives and strategies related to industrial policy in a geopolitically competitive environment. We invite Angela Wigger to reflect on the history of competition policy in the EU and provide a deeper understanding of the latest “come-back” of EU industrial policy. She will explain how EU competition policy is enshrined in the shift towards a neoliberal order since the 1980s. Angela will provide a perspective on contemporary competition policy since the financial crisis, reflecting on the role of political institutions like the European Commission. We will further ask Angela: How should we understand the concept of “competition” in the context of the EU? Whose interests do the EU’s competition policy serve, both in terms of industries and geopolitical actors? Are alternative types of competition policy feasible, and how should we shape them?
In this episode we do a deep dive into the realm of Big Pharma. As with Big Tech, this industry epitomises large-scale rentier income extraction by corporations. Despite the industry's assertions that the costs associated with drug research and development justify high prices, the stark reality of profit margins unveils a different narrative. We will further ask Nick: How did pharmaceutical companies transform over the past decades, and what implications does this have for the accessibility of medicines? What characterizes the business model of Big Pharma, and why should this be a matter of concern for us all? What is a pathway toward change in the pharmaceutical landscape? Which stakeholders should play a role, and what specific changes are imperative for progress?
Embark on a journey encompassing Brett Christophers' latest three books in this Crash Course Episode. He provides a comprehensive overview of the ascent of rentier capitalism, observed in diverse forms across political economies, and hones in on the pivotal role of asset managers in value extraction and shaping a rentier economy. Key questions we will explore with Brett: What exactly are rents, and what sets them apart from profits within the capitalist framework? Why is this distinction crucial? How has the landscape of asset management evolved, and where does it fit into the broader narrative of the rise of rentier capitalism? In the pursuit of decarbonisation, what obstacles arise due to the dominance of monopolists in various sectors of our economies?
In this first Crash Course episode of the new series, we invite writer-activist Cory Doctorow to explore the rise of Rentier and Monopoly Capitalism in the tech sector. Is the platform economy in the last phase of what he calls Enshittification? “First, they are good to their users; then they abuse their users to make things better for their business customers; finally, they abuse those business customers to claw back all the value for themselves. Then, they die.” - Cory DoctorowWe will ask him: How do big tech companies lock out competition and lock in users? To explain his concept of Enshittification and relate it to the rise of Rentier and Monopoly Capitalism. Are there historical parallels to the current trend? If so, what can we learn from them? Are we entering a new phase of capitalism where the rentier is at the top of the food chain? If platform and productive capital interests are at odds, what possibilities exist for workers and consumers to exploit this rift? How do we stop further corporate consolidation and monopoly power and build back a different economy?
In this special one-off we focus on European fiscal policy, following FiscalMatters' week of debate in which the future of the EU fiscal framework is discussed: “Too often important policy decisions happen behind closed doors. We need an open and accessible debate on Europe’s fiscal future”. Together with Ludovic Suttor-Sorel from Finance Watch we look at the current EU fiscal rules and how they should change in order to face the challenges we face regarding climate change, a just transition, rising inequality, unemployment and public health. How can we, civil society, academics and social and environmental activists contribute to fiscal policy for the good? What are the main problems of the current EU fiscal rules, and to what extent to they hinder countries to make the necessary investments to build resilient green economies? What kind of EU fiscal framework do we need to tackle the main challenges of the 21st century? What other instruments should the EU use to promote more convergence between the member states, and is this all feasible within the euro?