Show Notes
Migrants don’t get paid less because they’re latecomers to dwindling Western economies. No! It must be because of their race, their skin tone, just because they look different! Women don’t get paid less for the same work because they’re also a latecomer demographic added to a prop up a dying economy. No! It must be because of their crotch, their gender, their makeup! We can only begin to understand leftists and leftism (progressive liberal disorder) when we accept that their entire reasoning about everything is based on bodily sensations. Their universe literally ends where their skin begins, whereas for right-wingers, our universe begins where our skin begins, and ends where the universe ends. Of course, I believe there is a spiritual world where bodily sensations inform us of our gut feelings, our confidence, threats or fears, and so on, but to claim that these feelings somehow dictated how the universe ought to operate is a bridge too far. And this, I think, is where we find the biggest difference between left-wingers and right-wingers, for it is the difference between the body and the world. Do you believe the causes for what goes on in the world lie within your own body? Then you’re probably a leftist. Do you believe the universe has its own causes, which may or may not affect your body? Then you’re probably a right-winger, at least psychologically speaking. This has nothing to do with your preferred political party or philosophical inkling. It’s the difference between physiology and physics. So, where does the leftist preoccupation with their bodies come from? In leftist narratives, we often hear that people are “just bodies”, or bodies in motion. What does that even mean to them? It means they believe the whole universe exists within themselves, not outside themselves, and that, therefore, changes to the universe must occur within the body. You may have guessed it by now: This is why liberals and progressives believe a man can be a woman. They genuinely believe they can alter the physical universe by changing their bodies. It doesn’t occur to them that they are merely misleading themselves. In some cases, they are mutilating themselves. The fact that other people don’t see how self-mutilation somehow changes one’s reality just means they’re ignorant, uneducated, or worse: fascist. In this context, I believe their word ‘fascist’ is meant to designate “anyone who can still think rationally, reasonably, or logically”. A fascist is someone who can see difference, someone who understands cause and effect. These abilities, of course, are all the hallmarks of the equally defamed “White supremacy”. That’s why they say math is racist, because mathematical formulae don’t originate from our feelings, but from the rational world that lies beyond our control. Once more, this is the difference between accepting an observable world that can only to understand, what we call reality, versus attempting to manifest one’s irrational, even hysterical feelings into new realities, but without plausible cause. The leftist denial of reality then leads to severe cases of self-delusion, so that this labor politician or that Democrat politician can say, “This demographic doesn’t do as well on standardized tests, and therefore, the solution is to give them more money.” If only we would begin to perceive backward demographics as our equals, then they would become our equals. If we would call a man a woman, he would be a real woman. Or if we said, “we’re all one human race”, then it is magically so. Except, it’s not. But the body-oriented crowd can’t accept facts or truths. They believe facts only exist because fascists believe in them. Ergo, the Antifa crowd seek to attack those fascist believers and bludgeon the world into what they want it to be. But hold on—what if they’re right? What if there really exist this superior ability to grasp and observe the reality outside our bodies, and that predominantly White men, white masculine right-wing men,
More from The Great Johannes Podcast
In this livestreamed discussion, I went over several concepts relating to White men as the world’s scapegoats. And that—though we cannot change the role—we can stop playing it. By focusing on what we still can do for ourselves, we win status and competence on our own terms. That is something society cannot prevent us from doing. So, we escape the scapegoat role by refusing to argue for better treatment. Instead, we start treating ourselves right.
It turns out that people’s sense of race and language develops simultaneously. Meaning, a White American child would expect other White children to speak their language. But if they meet a brown child who speak proper American English, they will prefer the brown child to another White child who can’t speak English well. Elites, therefore, united behind their shared accents and dialects, usually the language of the power elite. However, rural people cannot unite behind a single language, since they speak wildly different dialects. And so, rural resisters must unite themselves behind race and religion.
In short, Epstein was working for the Rothschilds. He was a basic occultist working for Satanists. Their goal is to use technology to erase human religiousness. The Bill Gates jibby-jab may have been an attempt to chemically erase religiosity in some people. Elites hate Christianity, especially the patriarchal branch, because it guarantees people a free will. And elites rather see people as happy servants, bred to be slaves.
Nearly every Western nation is suffering an aging population, mass immigration, political corruption, an affordable housing crisis, and an anti-White media. Diversity is called a strength, or has it really been the result of our weakness in other domains? The Western world initially believed it could relegate Chinese industry into a position of eternal supplier to our needs. Then it appeared that China might win top dog position in the economic hierarchy of national rankings. In response, Western elites decided that we needed to get India to side with the West, at all cost. But how could we convince the massive population of India to fight with us against China? This, our ruling classes believed, could be achieved through a massive transfer wealth, namely to buy loyalty. India today is the number one recipient of remittances coming out of the USA. Remember Christmas 2024 when even Elon Musk started calling white people retarded if they didn’t like the h1b visa scam that was bringing in hundreds of thousands if not millions of Indians into the USA? His concern must have been that China wasn’t going to need any more Teslas and that Tesla was going to need the Indian market to both sell Tesla cars to and to have them produced there more cheaply. Perhaps the idea was to get to China and India to compete on price for Western consumer demands. So we learned that we can never trust our billionaire overclass’ interests because their interests are global and ours are local and national. The average person living in the West does not live globally but lives nationally at best, and how many people do you know who never even leave their local neighborhood because they work and study and go out in the same nearby streets? The needs of globalism have become a threat to our national survival. We are no longer investing in rearing children of our own because our foreign policy priorities are that we first house Indian or Somali immigrants for geopolitical reasons. A part of Somalia called Somaliland, for example, is a piece of real estate necessary for the defense of international trade routes along the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden. And so it seems that the Somali daycare scam in the state of Minnesota under the supervision of former vice presidential candidate Tim waltz is most definitely a dark money scheme to funnel U.S. taxpayer funds to illicit foreign organizations. Chinese strategists however foresee a totally different outcome. They believe that China will take the number one position as the world’s next only superpower. They believe that the U.S. and India will ultimately be competing against each other for second and third place positions. If this indeed were the outcome, then the USA will no longer be able to fund the defense of Israel, in which case that piece of real estate will fall into the hands of Arabs backed by China. No, I don’t support Israel or its regime. And no, I also don’t support China taking over the territory. But if China did take over the Middle East, it would then rule all international trade. And then, in such a scenario, what is to become of Europe? Already the USA seems incapable of defending Europe under its NATO pact. Of course Europe shouldn’t have to rely on defenses paid for by the USA. Europe should rather become independent. Europe, today, is importing over 60% of its energy needs from outside of the EU bloc. How can Europe ever be independent? For starters, we could reduce our surplus population. What I personally foresee is that the economic wealth of the West is going to wither away, that the Western military presence around the world will have to be largely withdrawn, and that we will once again realize that our most precious assets are our own people living on their own land. But there is a serious risk of subjugation by foreign enemies. Our land will require heavy defenses in the near future, since Europe is surrounded by its Islamic enemies and even the Russian leaders are dreaming of annexing
Thanks to TikTok’s Daniel Clark (who gets banned often), Johannes (English), and Seth. Note that Seth isn’t a member of the Vryburger Beweging, but added his comments about New Jersey and the situation in the USA. We spoke at length about the situation in South Africa, and about how to organize successfully against the “Woke Rainbow” governments. A great insight was delivered by South African Johannes, namely that “normie” White people tend to arrive at the same conclusions once they’ve had the same experiences.