Show Notes
What if financial planning were approached the same way engineers design aircraft, medical treatments, or complex systems—with clearly defined objectives, constraints, and rigorous trade-off analysis? In this episode, Benjamin Felix is joined by Braden Warwick for a deep dive into what it means to engineer financial outcomes. Drawing on Braden's background as a PhD-trained mechanical engineer and his work building financial planning software at PWL Capital, the conversation reframes financial planning as a design problem rather than a speculative exercise. They explore the critical distinction between a financial plan and a financial projection, why uncertainty does not invalidate good planning, and how professional communication under uncertainty can build trust with clients—especially those from technical backgrounds. The discussion highlights the importance of goals-based planning, sensitivity analysis, and explicitly quantifying trade-offs when clients have multiple competing objectives.
Key Points From This Episode: (0:00:04) Introduction to Episode 393 and the return of Braden Warwick (0:02:50) Braden's role at PWL and his experience deploying Conquest Planning software (0:05:46) The tension between low industry entry barriers and professional standards in financial planning (0:07:54) Braden's background in mechanical engineering and academia 0:09:33) Financial plans vs. financial projections: why uncertainty doesn't make a plan "wrong" (0:12:59) Lessons from medicine and engineering on communicating decisions under uncertainty (0:15:15) An engineering framework for financial planning: objectives first, then solutions (0:18:42) Why surface-level goals like "minimize tax" or "maximize returns" often miss what really matters (0:21:19) Evaluating plans against goals using projections, scenario analysis, and sensitivity analysis (0:24:28) Why sensitivity analysis helps planners focus on what actually drives outcomes (0:29:27) Handling multiple competing goals using trade-off analysis and Pareto frontiers (0:36:46) Practical ways planners can present trade-offs without complex math (0:39:25) Case study setup: professional financial planning with corporate clients (0:40:20) Salary vs. dividends for business owners when optimizing for legacy goals (0:44:26) Why financial planning software outputs can be misleading without context (0:48:23) The importance of understanding how planning software calculates key metrics (0:50:22) Using PWL's free retirement tool to analyze CPP and OAS timing decisions (0:53:44) Approximating Monte Carlo outcomes using standard error of the mean (0:56:16) Linking "bad" and "terrible" outcomes to plan success probabilities (0:58:44) How CPP and OAS deferral affects sustainable spending and downside protection (1:02:46) What makes PWL's CPP calculator different from typical break-even tools (1:05:15) Why wage inflation assumptions materially affect CPP deferral decisions (1:07:46) Closing framework: goals, constraints, sensitivity analysis, and quantified trade-offs (1:09:36) Financial planning as an emerging discipline rooted in engineering-style thinking
Links From Today's Episode: Live Webinar: How Much Do You Need to Retire in Canada? | Feb 12 @ 12NN EST | Register here — https://pages.pwlcapital.com/webinar-how-much-do-you-need-to-retire-in-canada?utm_source=rational%20reminder&utm_medium=rr_ep393&utm_campaign=webinar_retirement Meet with PWL Capital: https://calendly.com/d/3vm-t2j-h3p Rational Reminder on iTunes — https://itunes.apple.com/ca/podcast/the-rational-reminder-podcast/id1426530582. Rational Reminder on Instagram — https://www.instagram.com/rationalreminder/ Rational Reminder on YouTube — https://www.youtube.com/channel/
Benjamin Felix — https://pwlcapital.com/our-team/ Benjamin on X — https://x.com/benjaminwfelix Benjamin on LinkedIn — https://www.linkedin.com/in/benjaminwfelix/
Editing and post-production work for this episode was provided by The
More from The Rational Reminder Podcast
In this episode, we are joined by Chris Murray, quantitative researcher and former equity quant and trader, and Marco Sammon, Assistant Professor of Finance at Harvard Business School, for an exceptionally nerdy deep dive into leveraged exchange-traded funds (ETFs). Drawing on their research, Chris and Marco challenge common assumptions about daily rebalancing, volatility drag, and the long-term performance of leveraged products, offering a more rigorous framework for understanding how these investments actually work.
In this episode, we welcome back Alex Edmans, Professor of Finance at London Business School and author of Grow the Pie, May Contain Lies, and The Madness of Markets. Drawing on academic research and real-world market examples, Alex explores how emotions, social influence, and psychological biases shape investor behavior—and why even apparently irrational markets can be difficult to beat.
In this episode, Ben Felix, Dan Bortolotti, and Kelly Thomas revisit some of the blind spots from their recent discussion about the finances of marriage before diving into a deeply nerdy discussion about leveraged ETFs. Kelly brings a different perspective to questions around spending roles, career sacrifices, financial autonomy, and the mental load of managing household finances.
In this episode, we're joined by Victor Haghani, founder of Elm Wealth and co-author of The Missing Billionaires, for a wide-ranging conversation about how different types of investors shape financial markets. Victor explains the framework behind his forthcoming paper, Who Killed the Random Walk?, and how fundamental investors, static investors, and extrapolators interact to produce momentum, excess volatility, and other market anomalies. We explore why return chasing is different from momentum investing, how investor flows and inelastic demand can move markets, and how the Merton share connects expected returns and risk to portfolio allocation. Victor also discusses long-short direct indexing and tax-loss harvesting, his experiment giving investors tomorrow's Wall Street Journal today, how AI performed in the same trading game, the role of leverage in financial markets, and when borrowing to invest might make sense. We finish with Victor's advice to his younger self: be intentional about financial planning, build financial literacy, and make a plan. Key Points From This Episode: (0:01:20) Lessons from The Missing Billionaires—practical insights on sizing and the Kelly criterion. (0:03:13) Who Killed the Random Walk?—persistent puzzles in stock returns: excess volatility, momentum, fat tails, booms, and busts. (0:05:06) Victor's three investor types: fundamental value investors, static investors, and extrapolators. (0:07:54) How static investors amplify market movements through inelastic demand. (0:11:11) How investor types interact to shape volatility, momentum, and equilibrium. (0:14:02) Wealth flows between investor types and how they create instability in simulations. (0:18:15) Distinguishing extrapolative return chasing from systematic momentum strategies. (0:20:34) How extrapolators create price trends that momentum investors exploit. (0:23:46) The Merton share—risk premiums, volatility, and risk aversion in determining equity exposure. (0:26:39) Combining value and momentum for higher Sharpe ratios. (0:32:34) Long‑short direct indexing and how leverage increases tax‑loss harvesting. (0:34:00) Why fees, complexity, and risk of direct indexing may not be worthwhile without alpha. (0:43:21) The "crystal ball" experiment—advance information, poor sizing, and excessive leverage. (0:49:28) The role of leverage in markets—ETFs, options, embedded leverage, and nonlinear instability. (0:52:50) Why leverage can create nonlinear interactions and amplify market instability. (0:52:55) When borrowing to invest can make sense, particularly for younger investors with substantial human capital and limited financial capital. (0:55:00) Why borrowing costs, expected equity returns, risk, and the possibility of losing a large portion of savings make leverage a difficult decision. (0:57:29) Why the risk-adjusted return from additional equity exposure matters more than the headline expected return. (0:58:42) The relationship between human capital and leverage—and why human capital is not necessarily bond-like. (1:00:01) Victor's advice to his younger self: be proactive, become financially literate, and make a lifetime financial plan. (1:02:18) Why dedicating time to financial education can meaningfully change how people approach financial decisions. Sources From Today's Episode — https://zbib.org/62e42e55fae14cb0a1aa62941d6996a2 Links From Today's Episode:
What happens when a small group of exceptionally wealthy people holds a growing share of a country's income and wealth? And what can economics tell us about the forces behind that concentration?