Show Notes
Summary In this conversation, Chad Gross interviews Eric Hernandez about the existence of the soul. They discuss the definition of the soul, the relationship between the mind and the brain, and the arguments against physicalism. Eric presents the case for substance dualism and argues that consciousness cannot be reduced to physical properties. They also touch on the panpsychist view of consciousness and its implications. The conversation delves into the philosophy of mind and the implications for atheism and theism. In this conversation, Eric Hernandez discusses the concept of the soul and argues against physicalism and in favor of substance dualism. He presents three arguments for the existence of the soul: identity through change, indivisibility of personhood, and the argument from free will. Hernandez emphasizes that if physicalism is true, determinism is also true, which would undermine moral responsibility and intellectual integrity. He recommends J.P. Moreland's books 'The Soul: How We Know It's Real and Why It Matters' and 'Body and Soul: Human Nature and the Crisis in Ethics' as resources for further study on the philosophy of mind and the soul.
Takeaways The soul can be defined as an immaterial substance that possesses consciousness and animates the body. Consciousness cannot be reduced to physical properties, and therefore physicalism is false. Panpsychism suggests that consciousness is fundamental to reality and can arise under the right conditions. The arguments surrounding consciousness and the soul have implications for atheism and theism. The philosophy of mind is an important area of study for understanding the nature of consciousness. The concept of the soul is central to understanding human nature and consciousness. Physicalism, the belief that everything is physical, cannot account for the existence of consciousness and free will. Arguments for the existence of the soul include identity through change, indivisibility of personhood, and the argument from free will. If physicalism is true, determinism is also true, which undermines moral responsibility and intellectual integrity. Further study on the philosophy of mind and the soul can be pursued through books by J.P. Moreland.
Sound Bites "I don't have a soul, but rather I am a soul and I have a body." "If physicalism is true, consciousness can't exist." "Why not just become a Christian? That's exactly the heart of the Christian worldview." "Philosophy of mind is where it's at and where it's going to be." "I am either an immaterial soul or an immaterial substance." "I am not a purely physical object. I am a soul."
Chapters 00:00 Introduction and Movie Discussion 02:40 Interview with Eric Hernandez: The Existence of the Soul 09:30 Defining the Soul and Substance Dualism 19:27 Consciousness and the Mind-Brain Relationship 25:06 Objections to Dualism and the Panpsychist View 31:43 Justin Schieber's View on Consciousness 36:28 Moral Obligation and Implications for Atheism and Theism 37:28 Understanding the Concept of the Soul 39:26 Challenging Physicalism and Arguing for Substance Dualism 44:32 Three Arguments for the Existence of the Soul 50:02 The Implications of Determinism for Moral Responsibility and Intellectual Integrity 58:01 Recommended Resources for Further Study on the Soul
================================ We appreciate your feedback. If you’re on TWITTER, you can follow Chad @TBapologetics. You can follow Brian @TheBrianAuten And of course, you can follow @Apologetics315 If you have a question or comment for the podcast, record it and send it our way using www.speakpipe.com/Apologetics315 or you can email us at [email protected]
More from Apologetics 315 Podcast
🎙️ Show Notes: The Deity of Christ with Robert BowmanThis is a summary of the Apologetics 315 podcast episode featuring an interview with Rob Bowman. Bowman is the president of the Institute for Religious Research (IRR) in Cedar Springs, Michigan, and the author or co-author of 15 books on topics including apologetics, Christology, and the Trinity.This conversation, hosted by Brian Auten and Chad Gross , explores the evidence for the deity of Christ and how believers can be equipped to explain this core doctrine.🔑 Key Takeaways & Topics Guest Information: Rob Bowman is the president of the Institute for Religious Research (IRR) and has written or co-authored 15 books, including works on Christology and the Trinity. Book Focus: The discussion is based on two of Bowman's books:Putting Jesus in His Place: The Case for the Deity of Christ The Incarnate Christ and His Critics, a Biblical Defense
Summary: In this episode, Brian and Chad talk with Christian apologist and evangelist **Eric Hernandez** about his book *The Lazy Approach to Evangelism: A Simple Guide for Conversing with Non-Believers*. Eric discusses how evangelism and apologetics intersect, why every believer is called to defend the faith, and how to engage with skeptics effectively and biblically.
Guest: Braxton Hunter — President of Trinity College & Seminary, evangelist, apologist, host of Trinity Radio, debate partner with leading atheists including Matt Dillahunty and Dan Barker. Topics Covered
Summary In this episode, Brian Auten and Chad Gross welcome back philosopher and author **Peter S. Williams** to discuss his book, *Behold the Man: Essays on the Historical Jesus*. This engaging conversation explores the intersection of worldview, epistemology, and historical scholarship in the search for the real Jesus.
Summary Chad Gross interviews Dr. Christopher Cloos about the challenging Old Testament violence texts and his recent debate with theologian Randal Rauser. They explore the complexities of interpreting these texts, the role of moral intuition, and the contrasting views of covenant virtue ethics and providential errancy theory. The conversation delves into how moral intuitions can inform biblical interpretation while also addressing the potential pitfalls of subjectivity in understanding scripture. They explore how moral intuition can be used to interpret scripture, the implications of difficult passages, and the importance of engaging with differing views charitably. The conversation also highlights resources for further learning in this area.