Show Notes
A significant period of change The disability sector is facing another major round of NDIS reform. The proposed legislation has sparked widespread discussion among Occupational Therapists, participants and advocacy groups, with many working to understand what the changes could mean in practice.
Importantly, the reforms are not yet law. The legislation must still progress through consultation and parliamentary processes, creating an opportunity for the disability community to provide feedback and advocate for change.
A shift towards standardisation Many of the proposed reforms introduce more standardised approaches to eligibility, funding and decision-making. While consistency may improve administrative efficiency, disability support often relies on understanding individual circumstances, environments and goals.
For Occupational Therapists, this tension between standardisation and individualisation sits at the heart of many concerns. The proposed changes raise questions about how effectively future systems will reflect the complexity of people’s lives and support needs.
Changes to NDIS access and eligibility Several proposed reforms focus on how people access the NDIS and demonstrate eligibility. These include changes to functional capacity assessments and stronger expectations around treatment history before support can be approved. Together, these measures could reshape how disability-related needs are assessed and understood.
A new approach to functional capacity The draft legislation proposes assessing functional capacity without considering assistive technology or support from others.
For Occupational Therapists, this represents a significant departure from established practice. Functional capacity is rarely understood in isolation. Environmental barriers, informal supports and assistive technology all influence how a person participates in daily life. Removing these factors risks creating an incomplete picture of disability and support needs.
The challenges may be even greater for people with complex, overlapping or fluctuating disabilities, where function can vary significantly depending on context and available supports.
Treatment requirements and access barriers The proposed legislation would also strengthen requirements for participants to demonstrate they have explored available treatments before accessing the NDIS.
While intended to clarify eligibility, concerns have been raised about how this would work in practice. Access to treatment can be limited by geography, cost or service availability, and some people may reasonably choose not to pursue interventions that carry significant risks or side effects. Questions also remain about how treatment, rehabilitation and capacity-building supports will be distinguished, particularly for people with complex or long-term conditions.
Funding and support decisions Beyond eligibility, the proposed reforms could influence how supports are funded and which interventions participants can access.
One of the most discussed changes is the introduction of powers that could allow funding limits to be applied across categories of NDIS supports. While current discussion has focused on therapy funding, the proposed mechanism could potentially be used more broadly. This raises concerns about whether future funding decisions will continue to reflect individual circumstances and goals.
The legislation would also provide the NDIA with greater authority to determine which interventions are considered evidence-based. Although evidence-informed practice is essential, research often takes time to catch up with emerging interventions and assistive technology. A lack of extensive evidence does not necessarily mean a support is ineffective, particularly when strong clinical outcomes are being achieved.
There are concerns that stricter interpretations of evidence could reduce participant choice and limit access to supports that are currently delivering meaningful benefits.
The growing
More from OT Unplugged: Community of Practice Insights
A billable target only tells part of the story. The time needed to complete a report, the travel involved in a caseload and the support available to an early career OT all affect whether expectations are realistic.
Requests for essential equipment are becoming more complicated when a plan variation is redirected towards a full NDIS reassessment. For some participants, accessing the support they need now may also expose their existing funding to further changes.
The NDIS funding reset is here, and for OTs the implications go well beyond understanding the percentage reductions. There are questions about who will be affected, what happens when funding is reduced and what evidence may now need to be captured.
From 1 October, new NDIS funding changes will affect how some participants can access funding for social, community and civic participation. The detail OTs have been waiting for around the safeguard for participants with high support needs has now been released.
Some moments in your OT career stay with you. A decision, a client or even a comment from someone else can change the direction of your career or the way you think about your role.