Show Notes
Eleanor Millman, Senior Staff Product Manager, and Mina Tawadrous, Associate Director of Platform Engineering at SiriusXM, join host Justin Reock to discuss how platform teams can scale prioritization without relying on revenue.
They share how SiriusXM moved beyond RICE to build a custom framework for internal platforms, using weighted factors like developer speed, reliability, cost, and trust to guide decisions across teams.
The episode also explores their concept of “assumptions as code,” in which teams store and reuse assumptions in a central repository to reduce misalignment and improve decision-making, with AI helping to surface and validate those assumptions.
They close with how this system is shaping SiriusXM’s 2026 prioritization approach and what it signals about a broader shift toward builder-driven product development. Where to find Eleanor Millman: • LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/eleanor-millman-98b10350
Where to find Mina Tawadrous: • LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/mina-tawadrous
Where to find Justin Reock: • LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/justinreock
In this episode, we cover: (00:00) Intro (01:17) Mina’s role and path into platform engineering (02:03) Eleanor’s background and shift into product (03:15) Scaling prioritization across platform engineering teams (05:41) Aligning platform priorities with stakeholders (09:08) Evolving RICE into a platform-specific prioritization framework (11:33) Iterating on the prioritization framework over time (16:57) How the framework, data, and conversations drive alignment (19:06) Storing assumptions as code in a central repository (26:47) Resolving assumption conflicts with user interviews (30:47) How stored assumptions integrate with AI workflows (35:30) Standard mode and different user personas (37:20) The industry shift towards builders (41:04) The challenges of platform engineering (43:36) How SiriusXM is prioritizing in 2026
Referenced: • Measuring AI code assistants and agents • SiriusXM • VMware • How SiriusXM revamped their platform and developer experience • RICE Scoring Model | Prioritization Method Overview • The evaporating cloud: A tool for resolving workplace conflict
More from Engineering Enablement by DX
As AI agents become more capable, context quality is increasingly the limiting factor in their performance. In this episode of Engineering Enablement, DX researcher Brian Houck by his CAFE(S) is joined by co-authors Max Kanat-Alexander (Capital One), Eirini Kalliamvakou (DX), and Margaret-Anne Storey (University of Victoria) to discuss CAFE(S), a new framework for improving context quality. The panelists introduce the five dimensions of CAFE(S): Clarity, Actionability, Fidelity, Efficiency, and Security. They walk through common context failures, how poor context accrues technical and cognitive debt, what it costs in developer productivity and operating spend, how AI is changing the skills engineers need, and why context review could become as important as code review.
Meta researcher Moritz Beller joins Brian Houck to discuss how Meta measures developer productivity. Moritz explains diff authoring time and how Meta uses it to evaluate tools and guide engineering decisions. They explore how AI is changing engineers’ work and revealing gaps in traditional metrics. They also revisit Moritz’s “Mind the Gap” study and discuss the promise and risks of AI agents for testing.
In this episode of Engineering Enablement, Robert Lucero, Chief Architect at Okta, joins host Brian Houck to discuss how agentic AI is changing identity and access management. They explore how organizations should define agent identities, why authentication and authorization remain foundational, and how sandboxing, fine-grained permissions, and just-in-time access can enable agents to operate autonomously without creating unacceptable risk. Robert shares what Okta has learned from driving AI adoption among security-minded engineers, what makes a repository ready for AI agents, and why strong testing, CI, and review processes matter even more as AI generates more code. They also discuss AI’s role in software validation, the need for human judgment, and whether AI will ultimately give the advantage to security teams or attackers.
Max Kanat-Alexander is an Executive Distinguished Engineer at Capital One, where he helps lead developer experience and AI-assisted software development. In this episode of Engineering Enablement, Max joins Brian Houck to discuss how AI is changing software development and why strong engineering fundamentals matter more than ever. They explore how engineering skills are evolving, why AI can amplify weaknesses in the development lifecycle, and how teams should rethink code review, quality, and testing. Max also shares how leaders can assess whether their organizations are ready for more advanced AI workflows and why developing the next generation of senior engineers remains one of the biggest open questions in software engineering.
AI adoption among software developers is approaching 100%, AI-authored code now makes up more than half of merged code, and developers report saving more time with AI every quarter. But those gains aren’t translating evenly into better outcomes. In this episode of Engineering Enablement, host Brian Houck, Distinguished Scientist at DX, sits down with Justin Reock, Deputy CTO at DX, to unpack findings from DX’s latest AI Impact Report. They explore where AI is improving engineering velocity and developer experience, where concerns are emerging around PR size, change confidence, and failure rates, and why rising AI spend has yet to produce a comparable increase in innovation. They also discuss how AI is changing the meaning of code maintainability and where developers’ AI-driven time savings may actually be going.