Build the platform or use the platform: the two Databricks data engineer tracks nobody names
The Databricks Data EngineerShow Notes
Two Databricks engineers sit at adjacent desks. Same title, same pay, same words in the ladder document. Watch a year go by, and they are not doing the same job.
Both get rated strong. Both get told they're ready for more scope. Nobody says the useful thing: the evidence those two are stacking isn't interchangeable, and one of those years makes no sense on the other one's promotion packet.
In this episode: - Why the data engineering ladder quietly forks, and why that fork is missing from every ladder document - The five-minute question that tells you which track your last year of Databricks work actually built toward - How each track reaches staff, and the very different proof each demands - Where each track stalls a good year, and what to say in your next one on one to get moved off it
This episode is for Databricks data engineers past the junior stage who keep getting strong reviews and vague answers about what's next. Whether you write the cluster policies and ingestion frameworks or ship the tables the business argues from, you'll walk away able to name your track and ask for the work that gets you to the next rung.
--- Helping 18,000+ Databricks data engineers become seniors: interview like seniors, execute like seniors, think like seniors.
Follow The Databricks Data Engineer for new episodes every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday.
LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/jrlasak Newsletter: dataengineer.wiki
#DataEngineering #Databricks #DataEngineer #CareerGrowth #ApacheSpark #DeltaLake
More from The Databricks Data Engineer
The rollout is done. Every production table migrated to Unity Catalog, every one owned by a team group, and the revenue table carries a certified check mark. The platform lead posts in Slack: fully governed. Monday morning, finance replies in the thread. The revenue on the finance dashboard and the revenue in the sales deck are about three percent apart. Which one's real?
Two proposals sit on a head of data's desk, both about the nightly pipeline that feeds the finance dashboard. One swaps the full reload for incremental loads with Auto Loader: it finishes in a fraction of the time and it's cheaper every month after the first. The other keeps the full reload, puts it on a bigger job cluster and starts it an hour earlier. It costs more. Forever. She asks one question, "What happens if this breaks on quarter close?", and approves the second one.
Your nightly Databricks job ran long, so you open the Spark UI. Two hundred tasks. One hundred ninety-nine finished in about a minute. One is still running, and it's been running for forty. You double the cluster and rerun it. Same forty minutes. Nearly twice the bill.
Sam is four years into a Databricks role, up for senior this cycle. Merged pull requests on the ingestion layer. The nightly job he rescued at three in the morning when the orders table stopped landing. Then his manager asks for one call where the answer wasn't obvious, he framed it, and he lived with the result. Sam starts three different sentences. None of them finish.
Open the workspace. Start a cluster. Get coffee. Come back, and sometimes it's ready. If you've been doing this a few years you can feel that wait in your shoulders, and it's the least interesting part of the story.