Journal Review in Bariatric Surgery: Socioeconomic Disparities
Behind The Knife: The Surgery PodcastShow Notes
Why do millions of patients qualify for bariatric surgery, yet only a fraction ever make it to the operating room? Hosts · Matthew Martin, trauma and bariatric surgeon at the University of Southern California/Los Angeles General Medical Center (Los Angeles, California) · Adrian Dan, bariatric and MIS surgeon, program director for the advanced MIS bariatric and foregut fellowship at Summa Health System (Akron, Ohio) · Crystal Johnson Mann, bariatric and foregut surgeon at the University of Florida (Gainesville, Florida) · Katherine Cironi, general surgery resident at the University of Southern California/Los Angeles General Medical Center (Los Angeles, California) Learning objectives: This episode explores disparities in access to bariatric surgery through three key studies examining eligibility, referral patterns, and weight stigma. References:
Article #1: Socioeconomic disparities in eligibility and access to bariatric surgery: a national population-based analysis (2010, Martin et al.) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19782647/ Analyzed national U.S. datasets to compare patients eligible for bariatric surgery with those who underwent surgery.
Although more than 22 million Americans met criteria for bariatric surgery, only about 0.4% underwent surgery in 2006.
Patients eligible for surgery were more likely to be female, uninsured, lower income, and from racial and ethnic minority groups, while those receiving surgery were disproportionately Caucasian women with private insurance.
This discussion highlights insurance coverage as one of the largest structural barriers to care.
Article #2: Investigating racial disparities in bariatric surgery referrals (2019, Johnson-Mann et al.) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30824334/ This study focused on referral patterns within a primary care network.
Among nearly 4,700 eligible patients, only 5% were referred to bariatric surgery.
Referral disparities were seen across sex, ethnicity, and insurance status.
Hispanic patients were significantly less likely to be referred and were far more likely to be uninsured or self-pay.
The study emphasizes that disparities begin long before the operating room, often at the level of primary care referral and institutional access policies.
Article #3: Assessing Weight Stigma Interventions: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials (2025, Wang et al.) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40227369/ Examined interventions designed to reduce weight stigma.
Across 56 randomized controlled trials, most interventions demonstrated improvements in attitudes toward obesity.
Effective approaches included emphasizing the biologic and environmental causes of obesity, promoting weight-inclusive healthcare, fostering empathy through shared narratives, and using cognitive dissonance strategies to challenge implicit bias.
However, changing attitudes does not necessarily translate into improved clinical behavior or patient outcomes.
Together, these studies demonstrate that disparities in bariatric surgery occur at multiple stages: eligibility, referral, access, and treatment. Structural barriers, provider bias, insurance limitations, and societal stigma all contribute to inequitable care. Herein, we emphasize the importance of expanding access pathways, improving provider education, and actively reducing weight stigma to ensure equitable surgical care for all eligible patients. Please visit https://behindtheknife.org to access other high-yield surgical education podcasts, videos and more. If you liked this episode, check out our recent episodes here: https://behindtheknife.org/listen Behind the Knife Premium: https://behindtheknife.org/premium Oral Board Review: https://behindtheknife.org/oral-board Oral Board Simulator: https://behindtheknife.org/oral-board/simulator General Surgery Oral Board Review Course: https://behindtheknife.org/premium/general-surgery-oral-board-review Trauma Surgery Video Atlas: https://behindtheknife.org/premium/trauma-su
More from Behind The Knife: The Surgery Podcast
Join the Behind the Knife Surgical Oncology Team as we discuss the MATTERHORN trial and the addition of perioperative immunotherapy to FLOT for resectable gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma!
In this episode of the Behind the Knife Global Surgery Series, we explore what it actually takes to build a meaningful career in global surgery. Global surgery is not a single specialty or job title—it is a broad field that intersects with clinical care, education, research, policy, advocacy, implementation science, and health-system strengthening. So how do trainees and early-career surgeons find their place in it?
Open the capsule, quit the cigarettes, and know when to cut: the essentials of managing marginal ulcers after bypass. Marginal ulcers are among the most common complications after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, with a pooled prevalence around 4.6%, and they span everything from mild postprandial pain to perforation with peritonitis. In this episode, our expert panel works through three clinical scenarios (an uncomplicated early ulcer, a refractory ulcer with recurrent stricture, and a perforated ulcer with peritonitis) to build a practical framework for prevention, workup, medical therapy, and surgical escalation. Hosts
It’s 2 a.m. and a patient with a GSW to the thigh is rolling into the trauma bay. He’s hypotensive, tachycardic, and has a tourniquet in place. Do you get a CTA or go straight to the OR? What do you do with the tourniquet? Join us as we work through this and two other cases of extremity vascular trauma and break down the literature to answer these questions and discuss how we should approach these challenging injuries. Hosts: · Christian Hadeed - PGY 5 General Surgery, Brookdale Hospital Medical Center · Paul Haser -Division Chief, Vascular Surgery, Brookdale Hospital Medical Center · Andrew Harrington – Division Chief, Vascular surgery, Richmond University Medical Center · Lucio Flores - Vascular surgery, Brookdale Hospital Medical Center Learning Objectives: · Apply the X-ABCDE approach to patients with extremity vascular trauma, including the role of early hemorrhage control and tourniquets. · Recognize the hard and soft signs of extremity arterial injury and determine when additional vascular imaging is indicated. · Describe the role of the ankle-brachial index, CT angiography, and conventional angiography in the evaluation of suspected extremity vascular injury. · Discuss the principles of operative management of extremity vascular injuries, including temporary shunting, vascular repair, and restoration of limb perfusion. · Briefly discuss mangles extremities and when saving the limb may not be appropritate References: · American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma. (2025). Advanced trauma life support (ATLS®) student course manual (11th ed.). American College of Surgeons. · Lynch, K., & Johansen, K. (1991). Can Doppler pressure measurement replace “exclusion” arteriography in the diagnosis of occult extremity arterial trauma? Annals of Surgery, 214(6), 737–741. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199112000-00016 · Inaba, K., Branco, B. C., Reddy, S., Park, J. J., Green, D., Plurad, D., Talving, P., Lam, L., & Demetriades, D. (2011). Prospective evaluation of multidetector computed tomography for extremity vascular trauma. Journal of Trauma, 70(4), 808–815. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3182118384 · Polcz, J. E., White, J. M., Ronaldi, A. E., Dubose, J. J., Grey, S., Bell, D., White, P. W., & Rasmussen, T. E. (2021). Temporary intravascular shunt use improves early limb salvage after extremity vascular injury. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 73(4), 1304–1313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2020.08.137 · Asensio, J. A., Kessler, J. J., Miljkovic, S. S., Kotaru, T. R., Dabestani, P. J., Kalamchi, L. D., Wenzl, F. A., Sanford, A. P., & Rowe, V. L. (2020). Brachial artery injuries: Operative management and predictors of outcome. Annals of Vascular Surgery, 69, 146–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2020.05.049 · Barnes, C. J., Pietrobon, R., & Higgins, L. D. (2002). Does the pulse examination in patients with traumatic knee dislocation predict a surgical arterial injury? A meta-analysis. Journal of Trauma, 53(6), 1109–1114. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-200212000-00013 · Mills, W. J., Barei, D. P., & McNair, P. (2004). The value of the ankle-brachial index for diagnosing arterial injury after knee dislocation: A prospective study. Journal of Trauma, 56(6), 1261–1265. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.TA.0000068995.63201.0B · Weinberg, D. S., Scarcella, N. R., Napora, J. K., & Vallier, H. A. (2016). Can vascular injury be appropriately assessed with physical examination after knee dislocation? Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 474, 1453–1458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-4730-6
This mini-series on Behind the Knife will discuss the technical aspects of the Operative Standards for Cancer Surgery, developed through the American College of Surgeons Cancer Research Program and Cancer Surgery Standards Program. This episode highlights total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Host: