Show Notes
In the fifth episode of the Skin Flint Podcast, we invited Sara Kendall RVN to join us for a discussion on how veterinary nurses can improve dermatology cases by close interaction with the vets. Sara is also the Group Manager of the VNDG (Veterinary Nursing Dermatology Group).
Log this CPD with 1CPD here
Chapter 1 - Call The VN! (00:00) John introduces Sara to the podcast and Sara lets us now about her role as a nurse working in busy first opinion practice, who is involved in dermatology (01:31) Sue asks why Sara why she became an RVN. Sara shares her journey as a VN from the age of 17. (02:09) Sue asks if nurses are being used more in practice now and Sara feels like it has changed massively, from nurses being glorified kennel maids to becoming much more involved, starting for Sara with a graduate diploma changing her approach and showed her practice owner that she was capable of doing more. (03:35) John shared his approach from becoming involved in lab work taking him into dermatology and asked how Sara came to this field. Sara shares that It was the Vetruus/NextmuneUK rep coming round and showing their products which helped her to realise how much she could help first with ear management and then following that through courses into learning more and more about skin management. (04:48) John asks Sara what Schedule 3 is - and Sara clarifies this as the guidance for what nurses can do - in order to avoid blurring the lines between case support and actual diagnosis of conditions (05:35) Sue further clarifies this as nurses not doing surgery or diagnosing but helping with investigation and communication, exercising patience with clients in order to prevent them misusing treatments and therapies. (06:40) Sara echoes this by telling of how her clients will often reach out to her than the vet for this reason and are more likely to be honest about the management of their pets skin issue and ask questions they might feel are silly questions.
Chapter 2: Why The VN? (07:45) Sue mentions the NHS and their utilisation of nurses and asks if this something we could benefit from and Sara shares how she has been blown away by the size of the role in the human sector in the UK before John mentions his Aunt is a consultant nurse in dermatology - being the ‘go to’ for skin management. (09:22) Sara says how she feels the shortage of vets in practice in the UK can be really helped by utilising the nurse in this way and Sue echoes this, affirming this as needing to be a partnership in order to ensure the nurse feels capable and trained in order to manage this work. (10:35) Sue then asks Sara about the training she completed to work in dermatology and Sara talks of competing the Vet Nurse Merit award and using other bits of various CPD. (11:18) John then talks about how the VNDG (Veterinary Nursing Dermatology Group) and how it looks to bring all this together under one body, before then asking what the VNDGs objectives are - Sara then talks of the development of nurses to help more in dermatology for the benefit of practice, patient and owner. (12:10) So John asks if you are an owner with an itchy pet, at what stage would a nurse be involved and Sara demonstrates how the owner will come in to see the nurse for an hour long consults in order to facilitate a history of the case and diagnostic tests and to help educate the owners on the nature of skin disease.
Chapter 3: How The VN?! (13:18) Sue asks how the nurse makes the step to running that consult from doing skin tests and things in the background and Sara shares how she took a while to get to grips with the diagnostics, and so the consultation started more as an informational consultation about the challenges of lifelong skin management before then, as her confidence grew and she had educational support, going into more diagnostic support. Which John says is the opposite from his approach and this shows each individual nurse and practice setting will be different in how th
More from The Skin Flint Podcast
CHAPTER 1 – Rosanna’s 2 Pennies Worth This month, Sue, John and Paul welcome Rosanna Marsella to the platform - Diplomate of the American College of Veterinary Dermatology and Professor at the University of Florida. 03:57 – John invites Rosanna to introduce herself. Thirty years as a veterinary dermatologist at the University of Florida, teaching, researching and treating small-animal allergy alongside some large-animal work; Florida's climate means plenty of infections. 04:42 – John asks how she'd categorise pyoderma. Rosanna explains it's classified by depth: surface pyoderma (often the "hot spot"), superficial pyoderma (essentially bacterial folliculitis), and deep pyoderma, where infection breaches the follicle wall into the dermis (furunculosis). 05:35 – Sue asks how dysbiosis differs from surface pyoderma. Allergic dogs already have reduced microbiome diversity, which shifts sharply toward Staphylococcus during a flare; dysbiosis is that pre-pustular shift, while surface pyoderma is the acute inflammatory skin-barrier damage that follows. 07:45 – Sue asks what AMD looks like clinically. Rosanna describes the classic picture: thick-coated dogs developing intensely pruritic, erosive lesions almost overnight on the face, rump or hips, driven by an acute trigger plus moisture trapped against the skin. 09:01 – John asks how important it is to find the trigger rather than just treat the lesion. Miss it, Rosanna says, and the dog either won't fully respond or will relapse. 09:54 – John runs through the usual suspects - fleas, allergic skin disease, ear disease, trapped moisture, pain, boredom. Rosanna splits these into predisposing factors (thick coat, heat, humidity, swimming) and primary triggers, ranking fleas top: an oral flea product still needs the flea to bite before it works, so a flea-allergic dog may also need a repellent. 13:37 – Sue asks whether lesion distribution helps distinguish flea-driven AMD from other allergies. Rosanna's rule of thumb: the back half of the body is fleas until proven otherwise; facial lesions warrant a work-up for pollen allergy or Malassezia otitis, both intensely itchy in their own right. 17:07 – John asks Sue whether "fleas first" holds in the UK climate too. Sue agrees fleas should be ruled out in every case, even with fast-acting isoxazoline parasiticides on board. CHAPTER 2 – More Than Skin Deep
In this month's episode, Sue, John and Paul welcome Professor & Chief of Service (Dermatology) at UC Davis, Stephen D White to the podcast. Chapter 1: Sheep Skin Detectives (03:09) Sue sets the scope: primary-care perspective rather than rare autoimmune disease. Stephen confirms autoimmune skin disease is vanishingly rare in sheep (pemphigus foliaceus essentially unreported, bar one Barbary sheep case in a zoo). (06:10) Sue asks whether clinical distribution helps localise the cause in a pruritic sheep the way it does in a dog or cat. Stephen explains it's less reliable — thick wool can mask hair loss even with significant pruritus, though rubbing behaviour is usually evident. Lice are visible with a hand lens; mites are not. (08:07) Question on empirical response to treatment. Stephen notes lice usually respond well to licensed ectoparasiticides (mainly avermectins); isoxazolines are unlicensed in ruminants and unreported in sheep specifically (though used in camelids, and anecdotally a bighorn sheep). Repeat treatment at 2–4 weeks is usually needed to catch hatching eggs. Chapter 2: Suspect Number 1 - Ectoparasites (11:30) John asks for top differentials in a pruritic sheep, Stephen answers: “ectoparasites, ectoparasites, and ectoparasites” — mites, lice and sheep keds (which are insects, not mites). He stresses checking in-contact sheep, since one animal may be subclinical while another is severely affected. (13:49) Sue asks why would a referral centre see an ectoparasite case at all? Stephen: usually a failed or incomplete owner-applied treatment, or a backyard sheep simply not monitored closely enough for early signs. (15:29) On technique: always scrape if pruritic, using a medical-grade spatula rather than a blade (sheep are skittish; a slip with a blade causes injury). An otoscope with the cone removed doubles as a magnifier and light source. Dermatophytosis should also be considered — often presenting as facial alopecia rather than fleece loss — and can coexist with ectoparasitism. (15:09) John ask about photosensitisation. Stephen distinguishes hepatogenous causes (impaired phylloerythrin metabolism from hepatotoxic plants, or a genetic defect in Corriedale lambs) from primary photodynamic plant ingestion (e.g. St John's Wort). Lesions favour the head and distal limbs. Flock-wide cases point to an environmental cause (send hay/pasture samples to the local extension lab); idiosyncratic reactions (as seen with clover in horses) may occur but are poorly documented in ruminants. Chapter 3: Dermatological Movie Stars (26:48) John introduces orf, referencing its cameo in Sheep Detectives. Stephen describes it as a parapoxvirus infection, usually self-limiting, but causing anorexia through oral pain — a problem in production settings. A non-resolving “super orf” form causes severe weight loss. Stephen shares data from the retrospective study: of ten orf-affected sheep, five were euthanised, due to generalised cutaneous lesions or concurrent Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis abscesses — evidence that orf can significantly compromise immune function. One case of orf-associated facial alopecia resolved fully once the virus cleared. (31:07) On zoonotic risk and management: gloves are essential when handling any crusting lesion in sheep or goats. Management includes moistening hay to ease painful feeding, antibiotics for secondary bacterial infection, and parenteral treatment or stomach tubing in severe anorexia. (33:17) Sue asks about bacterial skin disease. Stephen identifies C. pseudotuberculosis and staphylococcal abscesses as the main presentations — often large, anywhere on the body, commonly peri udder in females. Internal abscessation (lungs, liver) is a key concern; aspirated purulent masses warrant involving a large-animal colleague, with caution against environmental contamination during drainage. Dermatophilosis is discussed as globally widespread and rain-associated, presenting dorsally, or interdigi
In this episode of Skinflints, we are joined by veterinary dermatologist Dr Stephen Shaw to discuss the role of JAK inhibitors in managing canine atopic dermatitis. Stephen explains the underlying disease process, highlighting the key cytokines involved in itch and inflammation, and how JAK inhibitors provide rapid, broad-spectrum control by blocking these signalling pathways. The discussion explores how treatment should be tailored to each individual dog, considering disease severity, secondary infections and long-term management goals. Stephen also explains the benefits of using JAK inhibitors during food trials, their role alongside other therapies, and practical considerations such as monitoring, vaccination and managing concurrent disease. The episode concludes by emphasising the importance of evidence-based treatment, informed owner discussions and regular clinical assessment, reinforcing that successful management relies on selecting the right therapy for each patient rather than adopting a one-size-fits-all approach. This episode is kindly sponsored by MSD Animal Health
(00:00:00) John introduces a new episode on Feline Orofacial Pain Syndrome (FOPS) — a baffling condition where cats can flip from calm to frantic self-injury around the mouth and face in seconds.