AI Security Ops

AI News Stories | Episode 36

AI Security Ops

Show Notes

This week on AI Security Ops, the team breaks down how attackers are weaponizing AI and the tools around it: a critical n8n zero-day that can lead to unauthenticated remote code execution, prompt-injection “zombie agent” risks tied to ChatGPT memory, a zero-click-style indirect prompt injection scenario via email/URLs, and malicious Chrome extensions caught siphoning ChatGPT/DeepSeek chats at scale. They close with a reminder that the tactics are often “same old security problems,” just amplified by AI—so lock down orchestration, limit browser extensions, and keep sensitive data out of chat tools. Key stories discussed 1) n8n (“n-eight-n”) zero-day → unauthenticated RCE risk https://thehackernews.com/2026/01/critical-n8n-vulnerability-cvss-100.html The hosts discuss a critical flaw in the n8n workflow automation platform where a workflow-parsing HTTP endpoint can be abused (via a crafted JSON payload) to achieve remote code execution as the n8n service account. Because automation/orchestration platforms often have broad internal access, one compromise can cascade quickly across an organization’s automation layer. ai-news-stories-episode-36 Practical takeaway: don’t expose orchestration platforms directly to the internet; restrict who/what can talk to them; treat these “glue” systems as high-impact targets and assess them like any other production system. ai-news-stories-episode-36 2) “Zombie agent” prompt injection via ChatGPT Memory https://www.darkreading.com/endpoint-security/chatgpt-memory-feature-prompt-injection The team talks about research describing an exploit that stores malicious instructions in long-term memory, then later triggers them with a benign prompt—leading to potential data leakage or unsafe tool actions if the model has integrations. The discussion frames this as “stored XSS vibes,” but harder to solve because the “feature” (following instructions/context) is also the root problem. ai-news-stories-episode-36 User-side mitigation themes: consider disabling memory, keep chats cleaned up, and avoid putting sensitive data into chat tools—especially when agents/tools are involved. ai-news-stories-episode-36 3) “Zero-click” agentic abuse via crafted email/URL (indirect prompt injection) https://www.infosecurity-magazine.com/news/new-zeroclick-attack-chatgpt/ Another story describes a crafted URL delivered via email that could trigger an agentic workflow (e.g., email summarization / agent actions) to export chat logs without explicit user interaction. The hosts largely interpret this as indirect prompt injection—a pattern they expect to keep seeing as assistants gain more connectivity. ai-news-stories-episode-36 Key point: even if the exact implementation varies, auto-processing untrusted content (like email) is a persistent risk when the model can take actions or access history. ai-news-stories-episode-36 4) Malicious Chrome extensions stealing ChatGPT/DeepSeek chats (900k users) https://thehackernews.com/2026/01/two-chrome-extensions-caught-stealing.html Two Chrome extensions posing as AI productivity tools reportedly injected JavaScript into AI web UIs, scraped chat text from the DOM, and exfiltrated it—highlighting ongoing extension supply-chain risk and the reality that “approved store” doesn’t mean safe. ai-news-stories-episode-36 Advice echoed: minimize extensions, separate browsers/profiles for sensitive activities, and treat “AI sidebar” tools with extra skepticism. ai-news-stories-episode-36 5) APT28 credential phishing updated with AI-written lures https://thehackernews.com/2026/01/russian-apt28-runs-credential-stealing.html The closing story is a familiar APT pattern—phishing emails with malicious Office docs leading to PowerShell loaders and credential theft—except the lure text is AI-generated, making it more consistent/convincing (and harder for users to spot via grammar/tone). ai-news-stories-episode-36 The conversation stresses that “don’t click links” guidance is oversimplified; verifi

More from AI Security Ops

Oct 16, 2026

In this episode of BHIS Presents: AI Security Ops, the team digs into some of the strangest recent examples of AI behaving badly. An AI agent finds a way around its sandbox using DNS. Malware asks four different AI models what it should do next. Attackers overwrite an AI agent’s “soul.” And a placeholder domain buried across GitHub becomes an unexpected security risk. Funny stories? Absolutely. But underneath them are some very familiar security problems. We dig into: - An OpenAI agent finding an unexpected path out through DNS - Whether a 2.5-hour response is fast enough in the age of AI - CLOSEDQUORUM malware using multiple AI models to make decisions - Why outbound AI API traffic could become a useful detection signal - The Carbonado botnet rewriting an agent’s SOUL.md instructions - The risks of exposed Docker daemons - How an unreserved placeholder domain can become an attack vector - Why AI agents make old security mistakes more consequential The takeaway: none of these techniques are particularly new. DNS tunneling, exposed services, compromised configuration files, and untrusted domains have existed for years. AI just gives attackers — and occasionally AI agents themselves — new ways to find and exploit those boring gaps at greater speed and scale. 2026-09-29-News (1).docx (00:00) - Intro: AI Behaving Badly

Oct 2, 2026

In this episode of BHIS Presents: AI Security Ops, the team continues its breakdown of the OWASP Agentic Skills Top 10, covering risks six through ten. Agentic skills may look like simple instructions, but they operate inside AI systems with access to tools, files, networks, and other resources. So what happens when those skills aren’t isolated, verified, monitored, or governed? We dig into: - AST06: Weak Isolation - AST07: Update Drift - AST08: Poor Scanning - AST09: No Governance - AST10: Cross-Platform Reuse - Why sandboxing the agent isn’t the same as isolating individual skills - The security tradeoffs between automatic updates and outdated skills - Why traditional scanners struggle with malicious instructions written in plain English - The importance of maintaining an inventory of agentic skills - How security controls can disappear when skills move between platforms The takeaway: securing agentic skills requires more than checking them once before installation. Organizations need visibility into what skills are running, what they can access, how they change, and whether their security controls survive across environments. OWASPAgenticSkils-Part2.docx This is Part 2 of our look at the OWASP Agentic Skills Top 10, covering AST06 through AST10. Part 1 can be found here #AISecurity #CyberSecurity #AgenticAI #AIAgents #OWASP #LLMSecurity #InfoSec #BHIS #Antisyphon

Sep 26, 2026

In this episode of BHIS Presents: AI Security Ops, the team tackles a big question: Could AI actually take over the internet? Recent warnings from AI industry leaders have raised concerns about autonomous agent swarms escaping containment, compromising systems, and operating at a scale humans may struggle to match. But what would “taking over the internet” actually require? The team looks at the problem from a hacker’s perspective — examining compute requirements, persistence, botnets, vulnerable infrastructure, the recent Hugging Face incident, and the difference between AI acting autonomously and humans using AI to accelerate attacks. We dig into: - Whether an autonomous AI swarm could realistically operate at internet scale - What the Hugging Face incident actually tells us about agentic security - The compute and infrastructure required to sustain a rogue agent swarm - How botnets and compromised systems could change the equation - Why existing vulnerabilities may be a bigger concern than hypothetical AI takeover scenarios - Whether slowing frontier AI development actually addresses the cybersecurity problem - The difference between AI exhibiting dangerous behavior and AI having intent - Why defenders need to focus on their real-world attack surface today The takeaway: AI is dramatically increasing the speed and scale of cybersecurity operations, but powerful models still operate inside systems designed, deployed, and connected by people. The immediate security question may be less “Will AI take over?” and more “What are we giving AI access to?”

Sep 21, 2026

In this episode of BHIS Presents: AI Security Ops, the team breaks down the first five risks in the OWASP Agentic Skills Top 10 (Part 1). Agentic skills can give AI systems reusable instructions, workflows, and capabilities — but they also introduce a new attack surface. A skill may look like a simple markdown file, yet the agent following those instructions could have access to your filesystem, credentials, network, shell, or other sensitive resources. We dig into: - AST01: Malicious Skills - AST02: Supply Chain Compromise - AST03: Overprivileged Skills - AST04: Insecure Metadata - AST05: Untrusted External Instructions - Why skills should be treated more like software than configuration - How excessive permissions increase an agent’s blast radius - Why external content creates indirect prompt injection risks - How isolation, least privilege, and trusted sources can reduce risk The takeaway: “just markdown” isn’t necessarily harmless when an AI agent can act on what it reads. This is Part 1 of our look at the OWASP Agentic Skills Top 10, covering AST01 through AST05. — Learn more about Black Hills Information Security: https://www.blackhillsinfosec.com/ Check out Antisyphon Training: https://www.antisyphontraining.com/ (00:00) - Intro: OWASP Agentic Skills Top 10, Part 1

Sep 14, 2026

Agentic skills can make AI agents more capable and consistent—but they can also introduce serious security risks. This episode explains how skills work, why malicious skills rank as a leading OWASP concern, and how seemingly harmless Markdown instructions can enable credential theft, remote payload delivery, and manipulated recommendations. Real-world examples illustrate how malicious skills can evade scanners and exploit trusted marketplaces. The episode concludes with practical safeguards, including reviewing skill files, watching for external instructions and prompt injection, pinning versions, limiting permissions, and running agents inside isolated environments. Links: OWASP Agentic Skills Top 10 Malicious AI Agent Skill Bypasses Security Scans and Seizes Full Control of Over 26,000 Agents (00:00) - Agentic Skills and the OWASP Top 10

See all episodes →