Show Notes
In this episode, host Kyle Polich speaks with Roan Schellingerhout, a fourth-year PhD student at Maastricht University, about explainable multi-stakeholder recommender systems for job recruitment. Roan discusses his research on creating AI-powered job matching systems that balance the needs of multiple stakeholders—job seekers, recruiters, HR professionals, and companies. The conversation explores different types of explanations for job recommendations, including textual, bar chart, and graph-based formats, with findings showing that lay users strongly prefer simple textual explanations over more technical visualizations. Roan shares insights from his "healthy friction" study, which tested whether users could distinguish between real AI-generated explanations and randomly generated ones, revealing that participants often used explanations as information sources rather than decision-making tools. The discussion delves into the technical architecture behind these systems, including the use of knowledge graphs built from tabular data, inference rules, and large language models to generate human-friendly explanations. Roan explains how his research aims to open the black box of recommender systems, making them more transparent and trustworthy for non-technical users. Looking forward, he discusses ongoing work on automated knowledge graph construction from resumes and job listings, research into fairness considerations around gender and location, and plans for real-world testing with actual job seekers. The episode concludes with Roan's vision for the future: AI systems that support rather than replace human recruiters, making the job search process less grueling while maintaining the essential human judgment that recruitment requires.
More from Data Skeptic
The next evolution of wearable technology may not require new screens or controllers, but new ways to interact with the devices we already wear. Shimon explores how gesture-sensing earbuds could transform virtual reality and wearable computing through intuitive, user-centered interactions that make technology more accessible and adaptable.
How do we design robots and autonomous vehicles that understand the unwritten rules of human behavior? Kyle speaks with Cornell Tech professor Wendy Ju about implicit interaction, "Wizard of Oz" prototyping, and what studying pedestrians, self-driving cars, and even robotic furniture can teach us about designing technology that behaves the way people expect.
The data we collect about ourselves can tell us a lot—but only if the technology collecting it actually fits into our lives. Daniel Epstein explores personal informatics, from fitness trackers and food journals to baby tracking and AI, and explains why abandoning a tracking tool doesn't necessarily mean it failed.
In the final episode of our Recommender Systems season, we explore the growing questions of trust, manipulation, privacy, fairness, sustainability, and user control. From fake reviews and shilling attacks to explainable recommendations and user-selected algorithms, we look at what happens when recommender systems must answer not only for what they recommend, but for the consequences of those choices.
In part two of the Data Skeptic Recommender Systems season finale, Kyle asks a deceptively difficult question: what should recommender systems actually optimize for? Drawing on conversations from across the season, the episode explores engagement, filter bubbles, popularity bias, fairness, human curation, embeddings, and the growing role—and risks—of large language models in shaping what gets recommended to us.