Show Notes
In this episode: 🧠 Coding agents are generalist agents — why "positive transfer" means an agent that's better at code is better at everything, and how that makes them "AGI-complete" ⏳ "Code will be solved in a year" — what the automation of knowledge work actually looks like, and why Jay joined ClickUp to be on it 🏗️ Why the labs are crushing AI startups — free-for-two-years deals, Windsurf losing Claude access, and the brutal economics of building on top of frontier models 🔗 The real moat is convergence — context, surfaces, and unit economics, a.k.a. "Cursor for your whole job" 💬 Slack's data walls & the Glean problem — why fragmentation is the enemy and a single system of record wins 🧪 RLVR & verifiability — why code became the perfect training ground for agents, and how to tell if you're even getting better 🔬 LLMs are running the frontier of science — Putnam 12/12, Erdős problems, simulating a cell, and vibe-writing economics papers 🚗 The car wash test that still breaks GPT-5 — spiky models, world models, Plato's cave, and the "stochastic parrot" debate 🏖️ Plus: mechanistic interpretability as "brain surgery," catastrophic forgetting, the danger of deleting knowledge from models, and a pitch for a "resort for LLMs"
Whether you're building agents, leading an AI team, or just trying to figure out what "agentic" really means for everyday work — this one's a fun, deep ride.
🔗 Links & Resources Jay Hack: linkedin.com/in/jayhack ClickUp: clickup.com MLOps Community: go.mlops.community
Mentioned: Gödel, Escher, Bach (Douglas Hofstadter) · "Machine Learning: The High-Interest Credit Card of Technical Debt" (Sculley et al.) · Periodic Labs · Ginkgo Bioworks · Physical Intelligence
⏱️ Timestamps [00:00] AI Timeline [00:22] AI Startups and Timing [06:30] GPT-3 Impact [13:24] Selling CodeGen to ClickUp [19:31] AI Interaction Patterns [28:41] Slack and AI Agents [36:11] ClickUp Task Automation [41:32] AI in Scientific Research [48:48] Human Understanding vs AI [54:18] Catastrophic Forgetting Explained [59:59] AI Delegating to Humans [1:05:00] Agent-Based Game Integration [1:08:42] LLM vs Game Design [1:11:27] Wrap up
#AIAgents #AgenticAI #ClickUp
More from Agentic Conversations (formally mlops.community)
What happens when you give 200 engineers who have barely touched AI a coding assistant and a six-month deadline to rebuild their platform? Pepijn Senders, a principal engineer who previously led AI enablement at HelloFresh, has done exactly that, and he chose Sonnet over Opus on purpose.
An AI slips out of its sandbox. A chatbot won’t explain your cat’s stripes. And your next shopping spree might not involve you clicking anything.
What happens to the web when the ones browsing it are no longer people? Sarah Drasner, Area Tech Lead at Google, sits down with us ahead of her Agentic Web keynote at AGNTCon + MCPCon North America. She works through that question from both directions: rebuild the web so agents can use it properly, or build agents smart enough to handle the web as it already exists.
Everyone is racing to build one agent that can do everything. Justin Schroeder, co-founder of Standard Agents, thinks the future looks more like thousands of tiny ones. Ahead of his talk on domain-specific agents at AGNTCon + MCPCon North America, he explains why tightly scoped agents might be the smarter bet, even if it feels like a step back toward the single-purpose machine learning models of a few years ago.
What happens to an MMORPG when half the players never log off? Issac Lee, who runs AI and blockchain experiments at NEXUS, has been testing that idea. His team is filling game worlds with agent players instead of scripted NPCs, so a new title feels alive from day one.