In That Case

#ITC10

In That Case

Show Notes

ITC#10: Jim McGinty on McGinty v WA

For many years, there was gross disparity in voting power in Western Australia, between electors in huge and sparsely populated regional electorates, and those in metropolitan electorates. It had long been a source of objection. Jim McGinty was a member of the WA parliament when he brought an unsuccessful High Court challenge to the laws which created the gap in voting power, before (as Attorney-General) he finally achieved the long hoped-for legislative reform to achieve greater parity.

More from In That Case

Jun 14, 2021

#ITC27: Claire Gibbs on Love and Thoms

Jul 31, 2020

#ITC26: Peter Gordon on Rolah McCabe’s case

Apr 13, 2020

#ITC25: Laurie Levy on Levy v Victoria

Mar 8, 2020

#ITC24: Sue Hackney, Jim McKenna and Rufus Black on Cobaw (part 2)

Feb 22, 2020

#ITC23: Sue Hackney, Jim McKenna and Rufus Black on Cobaw (part 1)

See all episodes →