How to Read Ecclesiastes: Absurdity, Futility, and the Simple Value of Life / Jesse Peterson
For the Life of the World / Yale Center for Faith & CultureShow Notes
The book of Ecclesiastes has puzzled readers for millennia with its unflinching observations about absurdity, meaninglessness, vanity, and futility. Biblical scholar Jesse Peterson joins Evan Rosa to discuss his book, *Qoheleth and the Philosophy of Value*, bringing contemporary philosophy into dialogue with this ancient text and reflecting on what happens when a sage confronts the gap between expectation and reality.
"Can you view your work, your toil, not just as a means to a further end? Can you rather turn to simply enjoy the work itself?"
Together they discuss the distinction between meaning and value, why Qoheleth denies lasting significance while affirming joy, the harm of death and the death of memory, Ecclesiastes and Camus's absurdism, and the book's surprising message about enjoyment as an intrinsic good.
Episode Highlights
"I think what's at the heart of the Book of Ecclesiastes is just to say, maybe not, maybe there isn't a direct line between what you do and what the result will be."
"It's not just that you'll physically die, but meaning that you've accrued in your life, if there was such a thing, that dies with you."
"In this moment of working on what I'm working on, whatever it is, I am fully alive."
"You have a little piece of the pie, and just own it. Absorb yourself into whatever that may be."
"Can you view your work, your toil, not just as a means to a further end? Can you rather turn to simply enjoy the work itself?"
About Jesse Peterson
Jesse Peterson is an Assistant Professor of Biblical Studies in the School of Theology and Honors Program at George Fox University. He previously taught at Purdue University, Fordham University, and St. John's University. He earned a PhD in Hebrew Bible from Durham University (UK), an MDiv from Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary, and a BA in music and Jewish studies from the University of Minnesota-Twin Cities. His work on Ecclesiastes has appeared in Harvard Theological Review, Vetus Testamentum, and the Journal of Theological Studies. He is the author of Qoheleth and the Philosophy of Value (Cambridge University Press).
Helpful Links and Resources
Qoheleth and the Philosophy of Value, by Jesse Peterson https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/qoheleth-and-the-philosophy-of-value/877B040C17EE8B9DD60174DEC7C306F7
Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience, Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi: https://www.amazon.com/Flow-Psychology-Experience-Perennial-Classics/dp/0061339202
Featured music by the Jesse Peterson Quartet https://jessepetersonquartet.bandcamp.com/album/man-of-the-earth
Show Notes
- The most philosophical book in the Bible - Bringing Ecclesiastes into dialogue with contemporary philosophy of value - Jaco Gericke's Hebrew Bible and Philosophy of Religion as catalyst - Authorship: why scholars date Ecclesiastes to the 3rd century BCE - The Solomonic persona and the epilogue problem - Amal (toil) and yitron (gain): does life add up? - Qoheleth as businessman: commercial language for philosophy - Three theories of meaning: subjectivism, consequentialism, intersubjectivism - "Maybe there isn't a direct line between what you do and what the result will be" - Brueggemann's orientation, disorientation, new orientation - The absurd: expectation vs. reality, linking Qoheleth to Camus - "Meaning that you've accrued in your life, if there was such a thing, that dies with you" - The same fate for all: wise and foolish, human and animal - Epicurus and the harm of death - Hebrew anthropology: dust plus life-breath, no afterlife - The carpe diem passages: "Go eat your bread with joy" - Joy as robust, not narcotic—enjoying toil as an end in itself - "In this moment of working on what I'm working on, I am fully alive" - Csikszentmihalyi's Flow and the autotelic experience - "Just own it. Absorb yourself into whatever that may be."
#Ecclesiastes #Qoheleth #PhilosophyOfValue #MeaningInLife #BiblicalStudies #HebrewBible #WisdomLiterature #CarpeDiem #Absurdity #ForTheLifeOfTheWor
More from For the Life of the World / Yale Center for Faith & Culture
What happens when an ancient discipline built to remake the self in the context of a way of life and normative map gets sold back to us as lifehacking for stress relief and optimization?
It took Odysseus ten years to sail home from Troy to Ithaca; we can fly the same distance in about an hour. But faster travel hasn't brought us any closer to home. We can know more, do more, and connect more than ever, and yet our ability to belong to our own reality seems to be shrinking. Philosopher Ian Marcus Corbin, who teaches at Harvard Medical School and directs Harvard's Public Culture Project, takes up that paradox in his new book, To Arrive Where We Started: Belonging in the Modern World. The title comes from T.S. Eliot's Four Quartets, and Corbin reads Eliot's lines as something like a mission statement for humanity: the point of the journey is not to escape reality or optimize our way around it, but to truly belong to it.
Everything is “maxxed” right now, and the news cycle in particular seems to be historymaxxing, insisting that things have never been worse than they are now. And the threats are real, from AI and global warming to election integrity—foreign affairs gone wrong, and violence abroad, in our homes, and in our schools. But the news maxxes us on fear, and so do politicians and corporations, because they want us to do something. If theologian Lee C. Camp is right, history was already maxed at the incarnation, and it came through a subversive way of life: humble, compassionate, at times angry, but radical and scandalous all the same. Camp, author of *Scandalous Witness: A Little Political Manifesto for Christians* and founder and host of the nationally syndicated podcast and radio show No Small Endeavor, argues that the idolatry of the nation state, and even the effort to legislate Christian morality and values into a political movement, is a subversion of Christianity.
Human growth can seem to just happen—genes, care, and nurture set each of us on a trajectory across the lifespan. But how do people actually grow toward wholeness, and is virtue even the point?
Technology, Aaron Cline Hanbury suggests, is never a purely neutral tool. But the history of ethical thinking about technology shows that as long as there's been technology, there's been anxiety about it. Or perhaps more accurately, anxiety about what we might do with it. And increasingly, what it might do to us.