How Decisions Get Made During Public Health Disasters
Who the Health Cares? with Prof Michael SparerShow Notes
The work of public health often becomes most visible when our systems are under the greatest strain. From hurricanes to pandemics, crises test not only our ability to respond, but also the strength, flexibility and fairness of the systems we rely on every day.
In this episode, Michael sits down with Mitch Stripling, Director of the New York City Preparedness and Recovery Institute, to discuss the role of emergency preparedness and response within our public health system. Drawing on decades of experience responding to disasters across the country, Mitch explains how emergency response systems are supposed to work and why they sometimes fail. He also reflects on what the COVID-19 pandemic revealed about our leaders’ ability to respond under uncertainty and the risks and opportunities that come with emerging technologies like AI.
The Center for Public Health Systems at Columbia's Mailman School of Public Health conducts needed research, facilitates public discussions, develops policy proposals and provides educational programs, all with the goal of encouraging a better, more efficient and more equitable public health system. This work builds on the recognition that the nation’s public health system is currently under-resourced, under-paid and under-valued, and that a stabilized and strengthened system would benefit all of us.
More from Who the Health Cares? with Prof Michael Sparer
Welcome to season three of Who the Health Cares from the Center for Public Health Implementation at Columbia University.
Public health funding is often discussed as a matter of budgets and policy. But the real story is about politics, relationships and power. In the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, states across the country received an unprecedented influx of federal dollars to strengthen their public health systems. But turning those investments into lasting change proved far more complicated than simply appropriating money.
Public health officials are navigating an increasingly complicated landscape defined by shrinking resources and political polarization. Meanwhile, artificial intelligence is transforming how health systems collect information, manage care and respond to community needs. The challenge for today’s public health leaders is figuring out how to adapt without losing the public’s trust or losing sight of their core mission: improving the health of the communities they serve.
The work of the U.S. public health system is invisible to many of us. That’s why public health guidance is often misunderstood – and ultimately mistrusted – by Americans on both sides of the political aisle. And in times of uncertainty, when clear guidance matters most, the gap between perception and reality is especially costly.
Getting public health messaging right isn’t easy. With trust in institutions on the decline and misinformation on the rise, even life-saving information often fails to reach the people who need it most. So what kinds of messages actually get through?