Show Notes
You're sleeping down the hall from the person who drained your bank account, put cameras in the living room, and told your kids god knows what, and your attorney is calling it a strategy. That's nesting. Let's talk about why it's bullshit. Here's what nobody tells you: nesting isn't just the long-term custody arrangement where the kids stay put and parents rotate in and out. It also includes that early disaster phase where neither of you has left yet, everyone's hiring attorneys, and you're still eating dinner three feet from the person you just told you want a divorce. Both versions count. Both versions are a lot. I get why people do it. The kids stay in their home, the routine stays intact, and it feels like you're protecting them from the worst of it. But what we're not asking is what it does to those kids to watch their parents quietly unravel under the same roof. We're looking at it through adult eyes and telling ourselves it's fine. It is not always fine. And the attorneys. God. Larry will tell you not to leave that house no matter what. Don't abandon the home, don't take the kids, just stay. Even after you told him last week it wasn't safe. Even after you told him things were getting scary. Stay anyway. I have a massive problem with that advice and I'm going to tell you exactly why. Here's the truth: nesting works for a very specific type of couple. The ones who still genuinely respect each other, aren't weaponizing anything, and are fully committed to keeping the kids out of it. Those people exist and I love that for them. But that is not most of you. And for the rest of you, especially anyone in a high-conflict situation, nesting is not a co-parenting strategy. It's a slow burn. Your kids don't need the childhood home. They need you to not be in a war zone. Two safe, calm, separate homes will always beat one chaotic shared one. Always.
Here’s What You Can Actually Take Away:
Nesting Has Two Forms: Nesting isn't just a long-term custody strategy; it also includes the chaotic early phase where both spouses are still living together while the divorce is actively unfolding.
Attorney Advice Isn't Always Your Best Advice: Lawyers tell you to stay in the home for legal reasons, but they are not the ones living through the consequences of that decision.
High Conflict and Nesting Don't Mix: When one parent refuses to follow basic cohabitation rules, nesting becomes a breeding ground for manipulation, recorded outbursts, and emotional damage for everyone involved.
Your Kids Need Safety, Not a Specific Address: Children are resilient and adaptable; what they need is stability and calm, not preservation of the physical home at the cost of everyone's mental health.
Structure Saves Everyone: Even when nesting is unavoidable temporarily, a clear written schedule with defined parenting nights, financial agreements, and decision-making boundaries reduces conflict significantly.
Nesting Is a Tool, Not a Lifestyle: At its absolute best, nesting is a short-term transitional measure, and treating it as a permanent solution creates long-term problems for parents and kids alike.
The Truth Bombs
"Nesting works for people who still respect each other, still love each other, and just don't want to be married anymore. That's a very small club, and most of you are not in it."
"Larry is telling me to hunker down and stay in the same home I told him last week was not safe. I have a big problem with that."
"Your kids don't need the childhood home. They need you to not be in a war zone."
"The moment you have a padlock on your bedroom door, you should not be in that home anymore. We are way past nesting."
"At some point you will move on with your life, and you're still in the same house as your ex. That gets really, really messy."
"Your attorney is not paying those bills. Your attorney is not in that house. Your attorney is not questioning their food intake. You are. So you get to make the call."
Follow Samantha Boss:
Website
Faceboo
More from The Ugly Truth of Divorce
The hardest part of co-parenting isn't always what your ex says. Sometimes it's that they say nothing at all. They read it. They sit on it. They answer a completely different question, or they ask you one back while dodging yours entirely. And you freeze. You're not allowed to make a unilateral decision, so you wait. Meanwhile the school needs the form back Thursday, the coach needs an answer by tomorrow, and your kid keeps asking whether they can sign up for floor hockey. Our kids end up paying for another adult's decision to ignore us.
Early in a separation, almost every parent has the same reaction: I don't want my ex taking my kids out of state. That fear is normal. It's also the fear that gets parents to sign restrictions they spend the next decade regretting. This week I'm answering the question directly, and then I'm flipping it. Because every limit you put on your ex lands right back on you.
Your parenting plan was written assuming you'd both stay put. Life doesn't care what you assumed. A dating app match, a cheaper cost of living, a job offer three states away, and suddenly the plan built for two local parents doesn't fit the family it's supposed to protect. This week I'm walking through what actually needs to be in your parenting plan before someone relocates, not after. Start with the distance rule. Most plans use something like 30 miles or 30 minutes. Move inside that line, and the whole plan stays exactly the same: same visitation, same holidays, same everything. Move past it, and the plan should trigger a rebuild, not a scramble. Your plan should also answer whether the parent can move out of state at all, what notice they owe you, whether court approval is required, and whether the move triggers an automatic review. Then comes the real question: is this an adjusted schedule, or a full long-distance parenting plan? If pickups, school drop-off, and weekday dinners aren't realistic anymore, you're building a completely different structure, one built on big chunks of time instead of weekly visits. Spring break, summer, fall break, winter break, these start shifting to the parent who moved, while the local parent keeps school-year stability. I'm also covering the thing most attorneys forget: a long-distance parent should still be able to fly in and watch a game, a recital, a school function, without it eating into their actual parenting time. And holidays need a full rework, because a long-distance parent is going to miss the ones tied to a single day, Mother's Day, Father's Day, Halloween, and gain more of the ones tied to a longer break, Thanksgiving, Christmas, summer. We're also getting into who makes the day-to-day decisions now, how child support recalculates when the schedule changes, who pays for travel and what happens when a flight gets canceled, how teenagers change the long-distance equation, what happens when a kid gets sick right before a trip, and what a reasonable communication schedule actually looks like when “we'll figure it out” isn't good enough anymore. The goal isn't to force the old plan to work. It's to build one that matches the life you actually have now.
Summer's coming, and if your parenting plan has a vague vacation clause, the same fights you had last year are already loading. Who asks first. How long you can be gone. Whether your ex gets “makeup time.” Whether you owe them an itinerary down to the restaurant. None of it should be a fight, and all of it becomes one when the plan doesn't spell it out. This week I'm walking through the six vacation fights I see over and over, and the exact clauses that shut each one down before it starts. First, the question nobody asks: does vacation even have to be during summer? I don't think so. Summer-only is predictable, but it's also peak pricing and packed destinations. Year-round vacation language gives you flexibility, cheaper travel, and room for the life you're building, not the one you're surviving right now. Stop living small inside your parenting plan. Ask for the vacation time your future self will want, not what this year's budget says you can use. Then the fights. “I asked first” is not a clause. I'll show you why notice-based language, 30 or 60 days, beats first-come-first-served and April 1st deadlines. How long can you be gone? That's a custom build, because three consecutive weeks is ridiculous to your coworker Stacy and completely necessary if your family lives across an ocean. Can vacation get tacked onto existing parenting time? It can if your plan doesn't say otherwise, and that's how your ex turns seven vacation days into three weekends in a row. Do you owe time back? No. Vacations supersede visitation, and time lost is not regained. Makeup time just gets muddy, and high-conflict people will stack it into a second vacation they never had to call one. And the two information fights: not enough, and too much. I saw a plan recently that required a parent to ask permission and wait 10 days for their ex to approve a vacation. Gross. Your plan should be written so well that you're informing, not asking. Destination, dates, emergency contact, flight info. That's it. And on the flip side, if your ex wants the full itinerary, every restaurant, every activity, daily phone calls? No. Safety information matters. Control does not.
Larry handed you a parenting plan with a list of holidays, a list of breaks, and a line about vacations, and called it finished. He never told you which one wins when two of them land on the same day. And your high-conflict ex found that gap before the ink was even dry. This week I'm breaking down the one paragraph missing from almost every parenting plan on earth: the order of priority. Because a list of holidays, breaks, and vacations with no hierarchy isn't a plan. It's an invitation for a high-conflict parent to clean house and take from you every single time.