Show Notes
In 2012, Dan Kahan et al. developed a test to identify people who are high on individualism and hierarchy. According to his research, 1-in-6 White men are high on individualist and hierarchical preferences. However, the test’s questions were leading, namely, the questions, by design, would only identify certain White men as HI (hierarchy-individualism), and no one else. Women and non-Whites were practically excluded from scoring on the “wrong end”. I decided to go over the pseudo-scientific test anyway, and discuss questions that nowadays, in 2025, appear to be simply mainstream truths. A. Egalitarianism-Hierarchy * It seems like the criminals and welfare cheats get all the breaks, while the average citizen picks up the tab. * We have gone too far in pushing equal rights in this country. * Society as a whole has become too soft and feminine. * Nowadays, it seems like there is just as much discrimination against whites as there is against blacks. * It seems like blacks, women, homosexuals and other groups don’t want equal rights, they want special rights just for them. * A lot of problems in our society today come from the decline in the traditional family, where the man works, and the woman stays home. * The women’s rights movement has gone too far. * Discrimination against minorities is still a very serious problem in our society. * It’s old-fashioned and wrong to think that one culture’s set of values is better than any other culture’s way of seeing the world. * We need to dramatically reduce inequalities between the rich and the poor, whites and people of color, and men and women. * Parents should encourage young boys to be more sensitive and less “rough and tough.” * Our society would be better off if the distribution of wealth was more equal. * We live in a sexist society that is fundamentally set up to discriminate against women. B. Individualism-Solidarism * People who are successful in business have a right to enjoy their wealth as they see fit. If the government spent less time trying to fix everyone’s problems, we’d all be a lot better off. * Government regulations are almost always a waste of everyone’s time and money. * The government interferes far too much in our everyday lives. * Free markets--not government programs--are the best way to supply people with the things they need. Too many people today expect society to do things for them that they should be doing for themselves. It’s a mistake to ask society to help every person in need. * The government should stop telling people how to live their lives. * Private profit is the main motive for hard work. * It’s not the government’s business to try to protect people from themselves. * Society works best when it lets individuals take responsibility for their own lives without telling them what to do. Our government tries to do too many things for too many people. We should just let people take care of themselves. Sometimes government needs to make laws that keep people from hurting themselves. * Government should put limits on the choices individuals can make so they don’t get in the way of what’s good for society. * It’s society’s responsibility to make sure everyone’s basic needs are met. * The government should do more to advance society’s goals, even if that means limiting the freedom and choices of individuals. * People should be able to rely on the government for help when they need it.
This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe
More from The Great Johannes Podcast
In this livestreamed discussion, I went over several concepts relating to White men as the world’s scapegoats. And that—though we cannot change the role—we can stop playing it. By focusing on what we still can do for ourselves, we win status and competence on our own terms. That is something society cannot prevent us from doing. So, we escape the scapegoat role by refusing to argue for better treatment. Instead, we start treating ourselves right.
It turns out that people’s sense of race and language develops simultaneously. Meaning, a White American child would expect other White children to speak their language. But if they meet a brown child who speak proper American English, they will prefer the brown child to another White child who can’t speak English well. Elites, therefore, united behind their shared accents and dialects, usually the language of the power elite. However, rural people cannot unite behind a single language, since they speak wildly different dialects. And so, rural resisters must unite themselves behind race and religion.
In short, Epstein was working for the Rothschilds. He was a basic occultist working for Satanists. Their goal is to use technology to erase human religiousness. The Bill Gates jibby-jab may have been an attempt to chemically erase religiosity in some people. Elites hate Christianity, especially the patriarchal branch, because it guarantees people a free will. And elites rather see people as happy servants, bred to be slaves.
Nearly every Western nation is suffering an aging population, mass immigration, political corruption, an affordable housing crisis, and an anti-White media. Diversity is called a strength, or has it really been the result of our weakness in other domains? The Western world initially believed it could relegate Chinese industry into a position of eternal supplier to our needs. Then it appeared that China might win top dog position in the economic hierarchy of national rankings. In response, Western elites decided that we needed to get India to side with the West, at all cost. But how could we convince the massive population of India to fight with us against China? This, our ruling classes believed, could be achieved through a massive transfer wealth, namely to buy loyalty. India today is the number one recipient of remittances coming out of the USA. Remember Christmas 2024 when even Elon Musk started calling white people retarded if they didn’t like the h1b visa scam that was bringing in hundreds of thousands if not millions of Indians into the USA? His concern must have been that China wasn’t going to need any more Teslas and that Tesla was going to need the Indian market to both sell Tesla cars to and to have them produced there more cheaply. Perhaps the idea was to get to China and India to compete on price for Western consumer demands. So we learned that we can never trust our billionaire overclass’ interests because their interests are global and ours are local and national. The average person living in the West does not live globally but lives nationally at best, and how many people do you know who never even leave their local neighborhood because they work and study and go out in the same nearby streets? The needs of globalism have become a threat to our national survival. We are no longer investing in rearing children of our own because our foreign policy priorities are that we first house Indian or Somali immigrants for geopolitical reasons. A part of Somalia called Somaliland, for example, is a piece of real estate necessary for the defense of international trade routes along the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden. And so it seems that the Somali daycare scam in the state of Minnesota under the supervision of former vice presidential candidate Tim waltz is most definitely a dark money scheme to funnel U.S. taxpayer funds to illicit foreign organizations. Chinese strategists however foresee a totally different outcome. They believe that China will take the number one position as the world’s next only superpower. They believe that the U.S. and India will ultimately be competing against each other for second and third place positions. If this indeed were the outcome, then the USA will no longer be able to fund the defense of Israel, in which case that piece of real estate will fall into the hands of Arabs backed by China. No, I don’t support Israel or its regime. And no, I also don’t support China taking over the territory. But if China did take over the Middle East, it would then rule all international trade. And then, in such a scenario, what is to become of Europe? Already the USA seems incapable of defending Europe under its NATO pact. Of course Europe shouldn’t have to rely on defenses paid for by the USA. Europe should rather become independent. Europe, today, is importing over 60% of its energy needs from outside of the EU bloc. How can Europe ever be independent? For starters, we could reduce our surplus population. What I personally foresee is that the economic wealth of the West is going to wither away, that the Western military presence around the world will have to be largely withdrawn, and that we will once again realize that our most precious assets are our own people living on their own land. But there is a serious risk of subjugation by foreign enemies. Our land will require heavy defenses in the near future, since Europe is surrounded by its Islamic enemies and even the Russian leaders are dreaming of annexing
Thanks to TikTok’s Daniel Clark (who gets banned often), Johannes (English), and Seth. Note that Seth isn’t a member of the Vryburger Beweging, but added his comments about New Jersey and the situation in the USA. We spoke at length about the situation in South Africa, and about how to organize successfully against the “Woke Rainbow” governments. A great insight was delivered by South African Johannes, namely that “normie” White people tend to arrive at the same conclusions once they’ve had the same experiences.