Show Notes
General Average, York Antwerp Rules, and Why the Jason Still Matters
General Average is one of the oldest principles in maritime law — and one of the least understood until something goes wrong. In this episode of The Shipping Lawyer, we take a deep dive into how General Average actually works in practice, why the York Antwerp Rules matter more than many realise, and how a century-old U.S. Supreme Court case involving the vessel Jason still shapes modern shipping contracts. This episode connects the dots between General Average, the York Antwerp Rules, the New Jason Clause, and both-to-blame collision, showing how these concepts operate together as a coherent risk-allocation system — not isolated bits of legal boilerplate. What General Average is, when it applies, and why fault doesn’t matter (at least initially)
What happens after a General Average declaration, including security demands and the role of the average adjuster
How the York Antwerp Rules standardise General Average — and why the version incorporated into your contract matters
Key differences between the 1950 and 2016 York Antwerp Rules, including crew wages, salvage, environmental costs, and interest
The real-world origin of the New Jason Clause, named after the vessel Jason
How the New Jason Clause separates negligence from General Average contribution
Why both-to-blame collision clauses exist, and how they prevent circular and commercially unworkable outcomes
How these clauses appear in BIMCO-style charterparties and bills of lading, and why they stop being “boilerplate” the moment there’s a casualty
General Average, the York Antwerp Rules, the New Jason Clause, and both-to-blame collision clauses are not relics of maritime history. They are practical tools that quietly determine who pays, how much, and in what order when things go wrong at sea. If you’ve ever dealt with a fire, grounding, collision, or salvage operation — or you advise people who do — this episode explains why the contract wording often matters more than fault. This episode is proudly brought to you by Cusack & Co Academy
More from The Shipping Lawyer
Detention and demurrage invoices land on desks every week, and too often the person holding one can’t say what they’re actually being charged for. This episode goes back to basics. Host Alison Cusack breaks down what demurrage, detention and storage each are, why the same words mean different things depending on who’s sending the invoice, and why it matters before you pay. (And no, it’s not about Dungeons & Dragons. Apologies if you were misled.) In this episode: Demurrage vs detention: same box, two places, two clocks Separate vs merged D&D, and why the label on the invoice won’t tell you which you have Where storage fits, who charges it, and why it runs alongside the other charges What stops the clock (and why customs holds and fumigation usually don’t) Why depot congestion and return directions can change your detention exposure What a lost or delayed bill of lading can cost you The “hat test”: are you even the right party to be charged? A four-question checklist for any invoice: who is charging, what for, are the dates and rates right, and are you liable? If you want a second set of eyes on an invoice before you pay it, not after, get in touch. General information only, not legal advice. Your position depends on your documents and facts, so please get advice on your specific situation before you act. Contact Alison Cusack, Cusack & Co Website: cusackandco.com.au LinkedIn: subscribe to the LinkedIn newsletter for more Email: [email protected]
The charterparty gets signed at speed. The ops team takes over. And the document sits in a folder until something goes wrong. In this episode, Alison breaks down how to manage charterparty risk well — even when you're moving fast. That means understanding your rider clauses, knowing what to do in the days immediately after signing, and using the life of a fixture to set yourself up better for the next one. What we cover: Why rider clauses are powerful — and why a poorly drafted one can create more ambiguity than the gap it was trying to fill The four questions to ask in a post-signing review (and why it's not a six-week exercise) The clause development file: a simple habit that changes your negotiating posture for every future fixture What the clients who manage charterparty risk well actually do differently Key concepts from this episode: Rider clauses — bespoke provisions that sit alongside the printed charterparty form. In most charterparties, they take precedence over the printed form where there's a conflict. Common inclusions: cargo-specific requirements, deviation provisions, off-hire triggers, bunker specifications, environmental compliance, and sanctions provisions. Post-signing review — a focused review of the charterparty after execution to map commercial risk. Not a due diligence exercise; a practical read with four questions: where are the commercial triggers, where are the asymmetries, where are the gaps, and what does the counterparty's performance obligation actually look like? Clause development file — an ongoing record of issues, ambiguities, and desired amendments built during the life of a fixture. The starting point for next time's negotiations. Work with Alison: If you need a charterparty reviewed — whether you signed last week or you're six months into an eighteen-month charter — Cusack & Co can help. 🌐 cusackandco.com.au📩 Reach out via LinkedIn or drop your details via the contact form: forms.office.com/r/3wV6PS9wPB Support seafarers: The Mission to Seafarers provides welfare support to crew around the world.🔗 missiontoseafarers.org The Shipping Lawyer is hosted by Alison Cusack, founder of Cusack & Co, a specialist maritime law firm. The podcast covers shipping law, maritime practice, and the commercial realities of the industry. Nothing in this podcast constitutes legal advice. If you have a specific legal issue, please seek independent advice. If you enjoyed this episode: please leave a review, subscribe, and share with colleagues in shipping, logistics, or maritime law. It helps more people find the show.
THE SHIPPING LAWYER PODCAST Season 3 · Episode 4 | Show Notes
Gulf Cargo Crisis — Part 2:Crisis Management Is Not A Spectator Sport We are 18 days into the Gulf Cargo Crisis and the most expensive strategy in freight law is playing out in inboxes everywhere — sitting on it and hoping it resolves itself.
Gulf Cargo Crisis — Update 1: What Cargo Owners Need to Know Right Now The Gulf is in crisis. If you have cargo on the water, or you're a freight forwarder with clients who do, this episode is for you. Maritime and shipping lawyer Alison Cusack breaks down exactly what is happening in the Gulf right now, what it means for your cargo, and — critically — what you need to do this week before the window to act closes. In this episode: The geography of the crisis: why the Strait of Hormuz leaves zero alternative routes, and what that means for global supply chains The Baltimore bridge collapse playbook — and why the Gulf is the same movie with a higher budget The Master vs House Bill of Lading explained: why cargo owners who try to deal directly with the carrier often hit a wall, and how to navigate the chain correctly The Four Ds of a Gulf crisis: Detained, Delayed, Detoured, Denied — the risk profile of each one The surcharge wave that is already being prepared by carrier commercial teams, and how to know whether you can pass those costs on Force majeure: why it is not a get-out-of-jail-free card, and the back-to-back contract mismatch that is already causing problems What to do if your cargo is already stranded Phase 1 action list covered in this episode:Master B/L · House B/L · Carrier T&Cs · Forwarder trading conditions · Marine insurance policy · Purchase contract · Downstream sale contract LINKS Issue 1 Companion Workbook (document inventory, force majeure matrix, surcharge checklist): Workbook 📩 Gulf Crisis Paid Newsletter Series — Issues covering contracts, the US picture from TPM Long Beach, and recovery options: ⚖️ Contract review and legal enquiries: [email protected]