Policy Concepts in 1000 Words: the Westminster Model and Multi-level Governance
Understanding Public Policy (in 1000 and 500 words)Show Notes
From Policy Concepts in 1000 Words: the Westminster Model and Multi-level Governance
A stark comparison between the ‘Westminster Model’ (WM) and Multi-level Governance (MLG) allows us to consider the difference between accountable government and the messy real world of policymaking. The WM may be used as an ideal-type to describe how power is centralized in the hands of a small number of elites:
We rely on representative, not participatory, democracy.
The plurality electoral system exaggerates the parliamentary majority of the biggest party and allows it to control Parliament.
A politically neutral civil service acts according to ministerial wishes.
The prime minister controls cabinet and ministers.
We may also identify an adversarial style of politics and a ‘winner takes all’ mentality which tends to exclude opposition parties. The government is responsible for the vast majority of public policy and it uses its governing majority, combined with a strong party ‘whip’ to make sure that its legislation is passed by Parliament. Power is centralized and government policy is made from the top-down. In turn, the government is accountable to public, via Parliament, on the assumption that it is powerful, responsible and takes responsibility for public policy.
In contrast, MLG suggests that power is spread widely across the political system:
Vertically – at supranational, national, regional and local levels ((hence multi-level).
Horizontally – shared between government departments and a range of non-governmental and quasi-non-governmental (quango) bodies (hence governance rather than government).
The hook is that we are witnessing a major transformation: from national governing institutions to supranational and sub-national governing institutions; and, from central government to the different levels of government and non-governmental organizations that interact with them. MLG identifies blurred boundaries between formal and informal sources of authority which make it difficult to identify clear-cut decisions or power relations.
[for more see Policy Concepts in 1000 Words: the Westminster Model and Multi-level Governance]
More from Understanding Public Policy (in 1000 and 500 words)
By James Nicholls and Paul Cairney, for the University of Stirling MPH and MPP programmes.
The eight (and final) of a series of podcasts tying together multiple 500 Words posts. They’ll sound a bit different from the 1000 Words podcasts because I recorded them in front of our MPP students.
The seventh of a series of podcasts tying together 500 Words posts.
The sixth of a series of podcasts tying together multiple 500 Words posts. They’ll sound a bit different from the 1000 Words podcasts because I recorded them in front of our MPP students.
The fifth of a series of podcasts tying together multiple 500 Words posts. They’ll sound a bit different from the 1000 Wordspodcasts because I recorded them in front of our MPP students.