Suicide Awareness for Employers

How to use AI effectively for an Employment case In this episode 268 of the podcast, I look at the recent Employment Appeal Tribunal decision in Hancox v Sutherland and Others [2026] EAT 139, in which a judge raised important concerns about the use of artificial intelligence in Employment Tribunal proceedings. The case involved an employee who submitted a 300-page skeleton argument prepared using ChatGPT, prompting the judge to comment on the growing use of AI by individuals representing themselves. I discuss what the judge said about the benefits and risks of AI, why lengthy AI-generated legal arguments can do more harm than good, and the importance of checking the accuracy of anything submitted to a Tribunal. I also consider what this decision means for employees, employers and HR professionals, and why AI can be a useful tool but should not replace sound legal advice and judgment. In this episode, we cover: The background to the Hancox case and the 300-page ChatGPT-generated argument. The judge's comments about AI and access to justice. The risks of inaccurate legal arguments and invented case law. The responsibilities of individuals using AI in Tribunal proceedings. Practical lessons for employers and employees dealing with AI-generated grievances and claims. Other Employment Tribunal cases that have referenced AI use. Rollo v Marstons Trading Ltd X v Secretary of State for Justice You can read the full judgment here: Hancox v Sutherland and Others [2026] EAT 139.

From the 30th October 2026 employers will be liable for the actions of strangers! In this episode 267 of the podcast I am covering a key change to the law which takes effect from the 30th October 2026 and one that many employers could find themselves falling foul of! Put simply all employers run the risk of liability for and a claim for third party harassment if they fail to take action.

In this episode 266 of the podcast I am covering a topic that has been much discussed among the Real Employment Law Advice team and which is causing increased stress and time for employers and managers, the use of AI by disgruntled employees. We are seeing a significant increase in AI being used by employees to draft grievances, prepare complaints, challenge decisions and fuel their desire to pursue Employment Tribunal claims.

Employment Tribunal awards compensation for an employers failure to make adjustments in the probation period In this episode 265 of the podcast I am covering a recent case decided by the Employment Tribunal where an employee was awarded compensation after the employer failed to make reasonable adjustments in the probation period. The case of Ms Khorram v Capgemini emphasises the importance of effectively managing probation periods and the requirement to make reasonable adjustments for employees with neurodivergent conditions.

This is going to be critical for all new employees from the 1st July 2026 In this episode 264 of the podcast I am covering the critical change to how managers and employers deal with probation periods for any new starters from the 1st July 2026. The qualifying period for unfair dismissal is going to be the shortest period it has ever been from the 1st January 2027 and this means employers need to prepare and manage probation periods and the first few months of a new employees employment carefully and proactively. Managers need to be educated on this now! In this episode of the podcast I cover: What probation periods are Why probation periods matter What is changing from the 1st July 2026 Why you need a good robust induction and onboarding process The importance of setting clear goals and targets for new starters in order to measure their performance and progress as soon as possible How getting it right does not have to be hard but does take time and planning Why having good forms and workflows for the process will aid managers to get the probation period right