Show Notes
In this episode, we unpack the growing tension in private markets—private equity, private credit, and private real estate—and examine whether their long-standing appeal holds up under scrutiny. With increasing pressure to bring these investments to retail investors, the discussion explores how illiquidity, valuation opacity, and complex fee structures may be masking risks rather than reducing them. We break down how private assets are marketed, why their "smooth" returns may be misleading, and what recent events—like gated funds and forced asset sales—reveal about their true risk profile.
Key Points From This Episode: (0:00:00) Introduction to the episode and overview of private markets as the main topic. (0:00:39) Clarifying PWL Capital's full-service wealth management approach beyond asset management. (0:03:24) Why private markets are under scrutiny and recent negative developments across asset classes. (0:06:36) The seductive sales pitch: higher returns, lower risk, and low correlation to public markets. (0:08:32) Private assets explained: what they are and why they appear less volatile. (0:10:06) "Volatility laundering" and the illusion of stability in private market valuations. (0:13:51) Retail investors entering private markets and the risk of adverse selection. (0:15:09) Liquidity challenges and the growing issue of gated funds. (0:18:33) Why illiquidity is especially problematic for retail investors with uncertain cash needs. (0:20:41) The debate over whether an illiquidity premium actually exists. (0:23:56) Trade-offs between liquidity and volatility in portfolio construction. (0:30:41) Evidence on private equity performance vs. public markets and the role of fees. (0:31:39) High dispersion in private equity returns and challenges of manager selection. (0:33:00) Continuation funds and evergreen structures raising valuation concerns. (0:36:00) Secondary market sales, NAV manipulation concerns, and "NAV squeezing." (0:40:00) Private credit risks, gating, and comparisons to publicly traded BDCs. (0:44:00) Insurance companies allocating to private credit and potential systemic risks. (0:45:02) Private real estate funds, liquidity issues, and IPO valuation shocks. (0:47:43) Public listings revealing large gaps between NAV and market prices. (0:49:34) Summary: private markets may be as risky as public ones, with added complexity. (0:49:44) Larry Swedroe's critique and the debate over private market outperformance. (0:52:00) Illiquidity premium vs. "smoothing as a service" debate. (0:54:00) Manager skill, persistence, and the challenge of accessing top-tier funds. (0:56:50) Final reflections on ongoing research and the importance of informed debate.
Links:
Meet with PWL Capital: https://calendly.com/d/3vm-t2j-h3p Rational Reminder on iTunes — https://itunes.apple.com/ca/podcast/the-rational-reminder-podcast/id1426530582. Rational Reminder on Instagram — https://www.instagram.com/rationalreminder/ Rational Reminder on YouTube — https://www.youtube.com/channel/ Benjamin Felix — https://pwlcapital.com/our-team/ Benjamin on X — https://x.com/benjaminwfelix Benjamin on LinkedIn — https://www.linkedin.com/in/benjaminwfelix/ Cameron Passmore — https://pwlcapital.com/our-team/ Cameron on X — https://x.com/CameronPassmore
Editing and post-production work for this episode was provided by The Podcast Consultant (https://thepodcastconsultant.com)
More from The Rational Reminder Podcast
In this episode, we are joined by Chris Murray, quantitative researcher and former equity quant and trader, and Marco Sammon, Assistant Professor of Finance at Harvard Business School, for an exceptionally nerdy deep dive into leveraged exchange-traded funds (ETFs). Drawing on their research, Chris and Marco challenge common assumptions about daily rebalancing, volatility drag, and the long-term performance of leveraged products, offering a more rigorous framework for understanding how these investments actually work.
In this episode, we welcome back Alex Edmans, Professor of Finance at London Business School and author of Grow the Pie, May Contain Lies, and The Madness of Markets. Drawing on academic research and real-world market examples, Alex explores how emotions, social influence, and psychological biases shape investor behavior—and why even apparently irrational markets can be difficult to beat.
In this episode, Ben Felix, Dan Bortolotti, and Kelly Thomas revisit some of the blind spots from their recent discussion about the finances of marriage before diving into a deeply nerdy discussion about leveraged ETFs. Kelly brings a different perspective to questions around spending roles, career sacrifices, financial autonomy, and the mental load of managing household finances.
In this episode, we're joined by Victor Haghani, founder of Elm Wealth and co-author of The Missing Billionaires, for a wide-ranging conversation about how different types of investors shape financial markets. Victor explains the framework behind his forthcoming paper, Who Killed the Random Walk?, and how fundamental investors, static investors, and extrapolators interact to produce momentum, excess volatility, and other market anomalies. We explore why return chasing is different from momentum investing, how investor flows and inelastic demand can move markets, and how the Merton share connects expected returns and risk to portfolio allocation. Victor also discusses long-short direct indexing and tax-loss harvesting, his experiment giving investors tomorrow's Wall Street Journal today, how AI performed in the same trading game, the role of leverage in financial markets, and when borrowing to invest might make sense. We finish with Victor's advice to his younger self: be intentional about financial planning, build financial literacy, and make a plan. Key Points From This Episode: (0:01:20) Lessons from The Missing Billionaires—practical insights on sizing and the Kelly criterion. (0:03:13) Who Killed the Random Walk?—persistent puzzles in stock returns: excess volatility, momentum, fat tails, booms, and busts. (0:05:06) Victor's three investor types: fundamental value investors, static investors, and extrapolators. (0:07:54) How static investors amplify market movements through inelastic demand. (0:11:11) How investor types interact to shape volatility, momentum, and equilibrium. (0:14:02) Wealth flows between investor types and how they create instability in simulations. (0:18:15) Distinguishing extrapolative return chasing from systematic momentum strategies. (0:20:34) How extrapolators create price trends that momentum investors exploit. (0:23:46) The Merton share—risk premiums, volatility, and risk aversion in determining equity exposure. (0:26:39) Combining value and momentum for higher Sharpe ratios. (0:32:34) Long‑short direct indexing and how leverage increases tax‑loss harvesting. (0:34:00) Why fees, complexity, and risk of direct indexing may not be worthwhile without alpha. (0:43:21) The "crystal ball" experiment—advance information, poor sizing, and excessive leverage. (0:49:28) The role of leverage in markets—ETFs, options, embedded leverage, and nonlinear instability. (0:52:50) Why leverage can create nonlinear interactions and amplify market instability. (0:52:55) When borrowing to invest can make sense, particularly for younger investors with substantial human capital and limited financial capital. (0:55:00) Why borrowing costs, expected equity returns, risk, and the possibility of losing a large portion of savings make leverage a difficult decision. (0:57:29) Why the risk-adjusted return from additional equity exposure matters more than the headline expected return. (0:58:42) The relationship between human capital and leverage—and why human capital is not necessarily bond-like. (1:00:01) Victor's advice to his younger self: be proactive, become financially literate, and make a lifetime financial plan. (1:02:18) Why dedicating time to financial education can meaningfully change how people approach financial decisions. Sources From Today's Episode — https://zbib.org/62e42e55fae14cb0a1aa62941d6996a2 Links From Today's Episode:
What happens when a small group of exceptionally wealthy people holds a growing share of a country's income and wealth? And what can economics tell us about the forces behind that concentration?