Show Notes
Radical leftist students sometimes occupy a university building, then refuse to leave. Or they glue their hands to a road in order to stop traffic. It’s their way of making a statement against this or that societal phenomenon that they perceive as fascist or bourgeois, etc. Such as people trying to get to work on time. But these and many other radical leftist tactics come from a single author. His name was Gene Sharp. In his book From Dictatorship to Democracy, Sharp listed around 200 nonviolent methods that radical leftists still use today in order to sabotage our society. Or rather, in order to sabotage the white middle class, which they deem the source of all colonial evil. I know that Gene Sharp wasn’t really a radical leftist. He was working with the CIA to help overthrow foreign regimes. But his methods were used succesfully to do so. And have you noticed how Western leftists today still use these methods to delegitimize the right, and to sabotage what is good? That’s why we are going to counteract this sabotage by using the left’s methods against hem, putting ourselves back in power. Sharp came to his methods by studying historical revolutions. He discovered that nonviolent revolutions had greater chances of success. And this is what we also want to achieve: to play to win. While some successful revolutions were violent, most of the successful ones were not. The idea of nonviolent revolution is that you can enlist grandmas and their grandchildren, whereas violent revolution exclusively attracts young males. Numbers-wise, through, it makes sense to include the aging White boomer generations of the West in the upcoming revolt for our survival. Instead of fighting the enemy head-on, we should focus on taking away their speech. We should smear their character, and publicly mock our opponents. These tactics, of course, are precisely the sort that we, on the right, have fallen victim to for too long. It’s time to return the favor. We can use the methods of the left against them, and so, pave the way to further our ethnonationalist resolve. The Ten Commandments of the Right Before I go over Gene Sharp’s many methods, I’ll first give you our Ten Commandments. This is a list of attitudes originally developed by another radical leftist, namely Saul Alinsky, once a favorite of Hillary Clinton, who wrote a book titled Rules for Radicals. In that book, Alinsky fantasized about overthrowing the White middle class, because that’s where he believed the power and the wealth was. I edited Alinsky’s rules for radicals into the Ten Commandments of the Right, as follows: 1. Intimidate the enemy. Make the enemy think you have more power than you really have. 2. Use what’s familiar. Build future action based on past experiences. People can only understand new things in terms of old things. The same is true for political action. If you venture too far from your people’s experiences, you will confuse them and the mission will fail. 3. Confuse the enemy. By doing things the enemy has never experienced before, you will confuse them. 4. Tirelessly ridicule the enemy and point out their flaws. Conservatives all too often try to reason with their opponents. We come up with facts and arguments to try to convince the left. But the leftist enemy thinks like a toddler. They aren’t interested in words. They only understand force. By ridiculing the enemy, we undermine their resolve. 5. Keep reinventing yourself and your tactics. When Hitler threatened to invade France, the French built their defenses on the same spot they had fought the First World War. Hitler surprised the French by simply ordering his troops to take a detour around the French defenses. 6. Threaten the enemy with the force you possess. The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself. 7. Bend the truth. Use anything the enemy says to your advantage. 8. Act first and provoke the enemy. By forcing the enemy to respond to our initiative, we put ourselves in charge of the situat
More from The Great Johannes Podcast
In this livestreamed discussion, I went over several concepts relating to White men as the world’s scapegoats. And that—though we cannot change the role—we can stop playing it. By focusing on what we still can do for ourselves, we win status and competence on our own terms. That is something society cannot prevent us from doing. So, we escape the scapegoat role by refusing to argue for better treatment. Instead, we start treating ourselves right.
It turns out that people’s sense of race and language develops simultaneously. Meaning, a White American child would expect other White children to speak their language. But if they meet a brown child who speak proper American English, they will prefer the brown child to another White child who can’t speak English well. Elites, therefore, united behind their shared accents and dialects, usually the language of the power elite. However, rural people cannot unite behind a single language, since they speak wildly different dialects. And so, rural resisters must unite themselves behind race and religion.
In short, Epstein was working for the Rothschilds. He was a basic occultist working for Satanists. Their goal is to use technology to erase human religiousness. The Bill Gates jibby-jab may have been an attempt to chemically erase religiosity in some people. Elites hate Christianity, especially the patriarchal branch, because it guarantees people a free will. And elites rather see people as happy servants, bred to be slaves.
Nearly every Western nation is suffering an aging population, mass immigration, political corruption, an affordable housing crisis, and an anti-White media. Diversity is called a strength, or has it really been the result of our weakness in other domains? The Western world initially believed it could relegate Chinese industry into a position of eternal supplier to our needs. Then it appeared that China might win top dog position in the economic hierarchy of national rankings. In response, Western elites decided that we needed to get India to side with the West, at all cost. But how could we convince the massive population of India to fight with us against China? This, our ruling classes believed, could be achieved through a massive transfer wealth, namely to buy loyalty. India today is the number one recipient of remittances coming out of the USA. Remember Christmas 2024 when even Elon Musk started calling white people retarded if they didn’t like the h1b visa scam that was bringing in hundreds of thousands if not millions of Indians into the USA? His concern must have been that China wasn’t going to need any more Teslas and that Tesla was going to need the Indian market to both sell Tesla cars to and to have them produced there more cheaply. Perhaps the idea was to get to China and India to compete on price for Western consumer demands. So we learned that we can never trust our billionaire overclass’ interests because their interests are global and ours are local and national. The average person living in the West does not live globally but lives nationally at best, and how many people do you know who never even leave their local neighborhood because they work and study and go out in the same nearby streets? The needs of globalism have become a threat to our national survival. We are no longer investing in rearing children of our own because our foreign policy priorities are that we first house Indian or Somali immigrants for geopolitical reasons. A part of Somalia called Somaliland, for example, is a piece of real estate necessary for the defense of international trade routes along the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden. And so it seems that the Somali daycare scam in the state of Minnesota under the supervision of former vice presidential candidate Tim waltz is most definitely a dark money scheme to funnel U.S. taxpayer funds to illicit foreign organizations. Chinese strategists however foresee a totally different outcome. They believe that China will take the number one position as the world’s next only superpower. They believe that the U.S. and India will ultimately be competing against each other for second and third place positions. If this indeed were the outcome, then the USA will no longer be able to fund the defense of Israel, in which case that piece of real estate will fall into the hands of Arabs backed by China. No, I don’t support Israel or its regime. And no, I also don’t support China taking over the territory. But if China did take over the Middle East, it would then rule all international trade. And then, in such a scenario, what is to become of Europe? Already the USA seems incapable of defending Europe under its NATO pact. Of course Europe shouldn’t have to rely on defenses paid for by the USA. Europe should rather become independent. Europe, today, is importing over 60% of its energy needs from outside of the EU bloc. How can Europe ever be independent? For starters, we could reduce our surplus population. What I personally foresee is that the economic wealth of the West is going to wither away, that the Western military presence around the world will have to be largely withdrawn, and that we will once again realize that our most precious assets are our own people living on their own land. But there is a serious risk of subjugation by foreign enemies. Our land will require heavy defenses in the near future, since Europe is surrounded by its Islamic enemies and even the Russian leaders are dreaming of annexing
Thanks to TikTok’s Daniel Clark (who gets banned often), Johannes (English), and Seth. Note that Seth isn’t a member of the Vryburger Beweging, but added his comments about New Jersey and the situation in the USA. We spoke at length about the situation in South Africa, and about how to organize successfully against the “Woke Rainbow” governments. A great insight was delivered by South African Johannes, namely that “normie” White people tend to arrive at the same conclusions once they’ve had the same experiences.