Show Notes
Most advisers say they want innovation. Fewer actually sit down and map where their time is bleeding. Marc Fabris has worked across advice, corporate, digital strategy and now as founder of Risk Hub and Life Insurance Guide. He has seen where the friction lives. This conversation is not about shiny tools. It is about removing process drag.
We talk about why most practices have never properly mapped their client journey, why 10 to 14 hours of onboarding time should concern you, and why small operational fixes can compound into serious growth. That includes practical tools like the Risk Needs Calculator, designed to simplify needs analysis and improve client conversations: https://riskneedscalc.com.au/auth
Marc also makes some bold predictions. Tripling new business in five years. Increasing efficiency without dramatically increasing adviser numbers. Rebuilding distribution while keeping advice human.
There is one consistent theme.
Take away the unnecessary complexity so advisers can spend more time being advisers.
If you are thinking about tech, growth, or where risk advice is heading over the next five years, this episode will challenge you.
👉 Join the My Risk Adviser Facebook community for Australian advisers: https://www.facebook.com/groups/myriskadviser/
The advice shared on My Risk Adviser is general in nature and does not consider your individual circumstances. My Risk Adviser exists purely for educational purposes and should not be relied upon to make a financial decision. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
More from My Risk Adviser
19 years in advice, three business names, one industry that never really lets go of him. Matt Page from Sprout Financial Services sat down with us straight off the plane from Melbourne and we went deep into the stuff advisers actually talk about when the cameras aren't rolling. ACC and how it quietly reshapes every income protection conversation in New Zealand. KiwiSaver versus super, and why one system lets cash-poor young families insure themselves and the other doesn't.
Zurich has knocked back TPD claims from three AFL players whose careers were ended by concussion, and the footy media is up in arms about it. We get why it looks bad. But these policies pay out on an activities of daily living definition, and it's hard to argue you can't read, write or communicate while you're studying an MBA at Oxford. Trent and Phil talk through what actually happened. The three TPD definitions and why AFL players only ever get the strictest one. Who set these policies up in the first place and why the premiums for anything better would be eye-watering. Zurich pulling concussion cover altogether from 1 May. The AFL's own $54 million injury fund. And James Brayshaw's claim that Zurich makes $10 billion in profit, which is out by quite a lot.
Every week, Phil and Trent dig into the My Risk Adviser Facebook group to pull out the most interesting questions and debates from real risk advisers dealing with real problems.
Zurich’s pricing changes are being framed as aggressive, but from an actuarial lens, they’re a response to worsening pool dynamics. Duration-based discounting pulls forward profitability, while lapse-supported pricing assumptions break down when persistency improves among higher-risk cohorts. The result is predictable. Loss ratios expand and repricing follows.
Most advisers aren’t short on CPD. They’re just not capturing what’s already happening.