
Show Notes
We talk to the historian Niall Ferguson about the politics of catastrophe, from pandemics and famines to world wars and climate change. Have we been worrying about the right things? Why have some countries done so much better than others with Covid? And what can history teach us about the worst that can happen? Plus, how likely is it that a cold war between the US and China turns hot?
Talking Points:
Niall argues that COVID is more like the Asian flu in ‘57/’58 than the 1918/1919 Spanish flu. However the economic response is unprecedented; the Internet made lockdowns at this scale and duration possible. Lockdowns were a near panic response that were necessitated by initial political failures in the West.
When we’re trying to assess the political impact of a disaster, the body count is not the most important thing. A disaster can kill a lot of people and be virtually forgotten if it doesn’t have cascading consequences. We will probably remember the experience of lockdown more than the mortality rates.
What did we get wrong about the COVID response? Controlling travel early on made a difference, and most Western states did not do that. The network structure of a polity is the most important thing in a pandemic, especially in an era of globalized travel.
The distinction between natural and manmade disasters is a false one. The scale of impact is a function of how we, collectively and our leaders, individually make decisions. Humans do not seem to be very good at thinking pragmatically about risks; we tend to ignore them in practice while simultaneously constructing apocalyptic fantasies.
Mentioned in this Episode: Niall’s book, Doom: The Politics of Catastrophe Larry Summers and David Cutler on the costs of COVID Graham Allison, Destined for War
Further Learning: More on Taiwan’s COVID response Why do so many people live near active volcanoes? ‘The Really Big One’ (the earthquake that will devastate the Pacific Northwest) The Talking Politics Guide to… Existential Risk
And as ever, recommended reading curated by our friends at the LRB can be found here: lrb.co.uk/talking
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
More from TALKING POLITICS
UnHerd political editor Tom McTague and Cambridge professor Helen Thompson team up to investigate the history of today’s politics — and what it means for our future. Each week they will explore the great forces, ideas and events that led us to where we are, whether in Britain, the United States, Europe or beyond. It’s a politics podcast for those who want a deeper, historical understanding of the news, to understand what has really shaped our world and why. We hope you enjoy!
Talking Politics producer Catherine Carr returns to her role as mic-wielder in 'Where Are You Going?' a unique storytelling podcast, delivered in bite-size episodes.
Past Present Future is a new weekly podcast with David Runciman, host of Talking Politics, exploring the history of ideas from politics to philosophy, culture to technology. David talks to historians, novelists, scientists and many others about where the most interesting ideas come from, what they mean, and why they matter. Ideas from the past, questions about the present, shaping the future.
David, Helen and Catherine get together for our final episode, to reflect on podcasting through six extraordinary years of politics, and what it means to be ending at the beginning of a war. We talk about the current crisis, how it connects to the crises of the past, and where it might fit in to the crises of the future. This episode is dedicated to Finbarr Livesey and Aaron Rapport.
For our penultimate episode, David talks to Helen about her new book Disorder: Hard Times in the Twenty-First Century. It’s a conversation about many of the themes Helen has explored on Talking Politics over the years, from the energy transition to the perils of QE, from the travails of the Eurozone to the crisis of democracy, from China to America, from the past to the present to the future. In this book, she brings all these themes together to help make sense of the world we’re in. Talking Points: