Show Notes
Childhood trauma may result in enduring emotional scars that influence self-perception and worldview over long periods. According to My Big TOE (MBT), these wounds are neither permanent nor inevitable. They originate from fear-based interpretations formed during childhood and can be understood, released, and transformed through conscious choice. This essay examines the origins of childhood trauma within the MBT model, explores its continuing nature, and outlines practical methods for overcoming trauma to achieve greater freedom, love, and purpose.
The Nature and Origins of Childhood Trauma In Tom Campbell’s My Big TOE (MBT), trauma, particularly psychological and mental trauma rooted in childhood, is not mainly caused by external events. Instead, it is conceptualised as a fear-based contraction of consciousness. Trauma develops when a negative experience is internalised as a core belief, such as: “I am defective. I am unlovable. I am not enough.” This internalisation is especially potent in childhood, as young children are naturally self-centred. Their limited perspective leads them to interpret every hurtful interaction as an indication of their individual worth. A parent’s anger, neglect, favouritism, physical abuse, or abandonment is seldom recognised by the child as stemming from the parent’s own fears or unaddressed issues. Instead, the child often concludes, “If I were worthy, this wouldn’t be happening.” This mechanism operates regardless of whether the wound is severe (such as abuse, molestation, or abandonment) or apparently minor (such as not receiving attention or a desired toy). In both scenarios, fear is internalised as a truth about the self, establishing a persistent filter through which subsequent experiences are interpreted How Trauma Becomes Self-Reinforcing Once established, the belief in personal inadequacy becomes a self-perpetuating cycle. Subsequent slights, rejections, or difficulties are interpreted as further evidence of defectiveness. Relationships become strained, and the capacity to love diminishes. Self-centred fear may result in withdrawal, anger, depression, or even suicidal ideation. Life experiences appear to confirm the initial wound, thus intensifying the contraction of consciousness. Within the MBT framework, this process is described as an increase in entropy, in which fear generates greater disorder in consciousness. Physical life, conceptualised as a virtual reality, serves as a training ground for the evolution of consciousness. Trauma represents a stagnation point in which individual development is impeded, as the individual remains confined by fear-based choices rather than progressing toward love and expanded awareness. Trauma Is Not Inevitable — It Depends on Acceptance A central insight in MBT is that identical events may traumatise one individual while leaving another relatively unaffected. Trauma is not an automatic response; it results from accepting a fear-based interpretation. Individuals who reject negative interpretations, such as “This is their limitation, not proof of my worth,” may experience hardship but do not internalise it as self-loathing. For example, soldiers exposed to violence, children enduring abuse, or individuals encountering negativity online may respond differently: some internalise guilt or inadequacy, while others attribute the experience externally and continue to develop. This variation stresses the importance of personal responsibility. Although external events may be uncontrollable, individuals retain agency over how they perceive and answer to these experiences. The Route to Healing: Shifting Perception and Reducing Entropy Within the MBT framework, healing childhood trauma begins with recognising its true nature: it is not a permanent mark on the individual, but rather a belief system constructed from a child’s limited perspective and fear. As individuals mature, this perspective can be consciously revised. Essential steps include: * Reframe person
More from The Players Guide - Thriving Insights
You are interested in the paranormal—but nothing has ever convinced you. This is aimed at a particular type of individual. You’ve heard things concerning consciousness. You’ve paid attention to Tom Campbell’s views on reality being something like a virtual world operated by a greater consciousness system. That notion is more plausible to you than the idea that everything is just atoms and is also more convincing than a great deal of New Age nonsense. You are interested in psi phenomena—things such as mind reading and clairvoyance: picking up someone else’s thoughts, seeing or sensing something that is not in front of you, knowing a fact that you have never been told. You want it to be genuine. Yet, in your own life nothing has ever occurred that you couldn’t account for using your intellect. A coincidence was merely a coincidence. A dream had a clear origin. A feeling was nothing but intuition doing its normal job. It is a honest position to take. The problem is that the mind is very good at convincing itself that it is right. Even if it accepts a major theory, it can still wait forever for proof that never actually comes. This essay isn’t aiming to get you to believe anything. Instead, it’s pointing the way to a room you’re actually able to enter. There exists a form of coaching in which you have no need to believe anything at the beginning. You needn’t even take part—you can just sit by the side and observe. Strangers take the place of people they have never met before. When the session is well conducted, there are things that are very difficult to account for by saying they were acting, due to luck, or the result of clever guessing. It is known as systemic coaching, though a great many people still refer to it as family constellations. The latter term is helpful because it reflects how the approach began; it is nevertheless a little misleading because the work is not solely concerned with families, and it is not merely therapeutic. It can apply to friends, work, money, houses, and patterns that keep recurring no matter how much you think about them .What systemic coaching is, and how it helps The fundamental idea is simple: a problem in your life doesn’t always originate with you; it may be part of a larger system to which you belong. That system could be your family, or it could be a friendship, a marriage, a work team, a business, or even your relationship with money or with a house. If anything within that system is wrong—for example, if someone has been left ‘out in the cold’, if someone who should be mourned hasn’t been, or if someone is carrying a burden that doesn’t actually belong to them—then the difficulty can appear in the next person in the line. Talking is helpful, coaching is helpful and therapy is helpful, but certain patterns don’t change merely because you understand them; you may see the cycle and yet still end up going back into it. A person does not have to be present if the client wishes to heal a particular relationship with an individual—for example, a child, a parent, a partner, or a friend—because the work is carried out through stand-ins. During a group session, people typically sit in a circle. The individual with the issue to deal with—let’s call them the client—first has a conversation with the coach about it. This talk is often held privately, not in front of the rest of the group. It is not a detailed account of their entire life. Just a few key points are given: who is involved, who died young, who was left out, who came first. Then, while again in the circle, the client asks, under the coach’s guidance, each person in the group one at a time whether they are willing to stand in for a part of the system, without telling them which part — for instance, the mother, the father, a first love, a child who died, a boss, ‘the money’, ‘the house’, ‘the future’. No one offers themselves voluntarily. Permission must be obtained first. If someone says yes, the client places those people in the room usin
Imagine being just 365 days away from a finish line you have literally spent 40 years running toward. You’ve played by the rules, put in the gruelling hours, and sacrificed your present for the promise of a peaceful future. Then, right before you cross that line, the railway track you had followed for decades suddenly ends — the rails are gone, the signals dark, and the destination station erased as if it never existed. The future you worked your whole life for is simply wiped out.
The ideas in My Big TOE have long drawn casual ridicule. When a physicist and consciousness researcher argues that consciousness is fundamental and that physical reality functions like a computed virtual reality, the response is often dismissive: the claims sit so far outside ordinary materialist thinking that mockery feels like the first available reaction. That reaction is not merely noise. It is a symptom of how far ahead of the cultural curve some of these ideas still sit. If someone in the 1980s had shown us a smartphone and explained that this pocket-sized device contained more computing power than the systems that guided Apollo 11 to the Moon — and that it would one day cost about the same as a nice dinner out or a pair of quality headphones — we would almost certainly have been laughed at.
Introduction: Tom Campbell and the Quest for a Theory of Everything As you may deduce from this website, the individual from whom I have gained the most knowledge is Tom Campbell. Campbell, a physicist and consciousness researcher, has devoted decades to bridging empirical science with questions traditionally posed by philosophy and spirituality. His seminal work, My Big TOE (Theory of Everything), builds on and challenges the foundations of major philosophical debates, notably those concerning the nature of reality, consciousness, and the relationship between mind and matter. What makes My Big TOE uniquely powerful is Campbell’s rare ability, developed from his early years, to repeatedly enter altered states of consciousness. This allowed him to apply the scientific method—careful, repeatable experimentation, observation, and logical analysis—directly to the non-physical realm. Through this disciplined process, he was able to gather consistent data and arrive at the comprehensive theory he presents today. By integrating insights from both Western materialist traditions and Eastern philosophies that emphasise the primacy of consciousness, Campbell’s theory invites us to reconsider what we know about existence and the human experience. Exploring Campbell’s work offers a transformative journey that not only unveils the intricacies of reality but also sheds light on the purpose of the human experience within the grand tapestry of the universe Overview of My Big TOE Thomas Campbell’s My Big TOE integrates science, philosophy, and metaphysics, striving to provide a unified insight into the cosmos and our place within it. At the core of this theory is the idea that our reality is only one segment of a larger, interconnected multiverse, which refers to an existence composed of many possible realities or universes beyond what we perceive directly. The theory posits that consciousness, understood here as the fundamental awareness that creates and experiences reality, is the root of all existence. “Consciousness is the fundamental awareness that creates and experiences reality.”
Wanting Control Most of us spend a lot of energy trying to control our environment, other people, and the outcomes of our interactions. It feels natural. The physical world appears uncertain, so the ego reaches for levers it can pull. The difficulty is that nearly everything we attempt to manage lies outside our actual authority. Other people’s free will, their internal data, their own evolutionary course—none of it belongs to us. The only process we can directly influence is the quality of our own consciousness and the intent we bring to each moment. We imagine we control all sorts of things, but we really only control ourselves. You might already recognise this pattern in your own life. Most of us do. The Partnership That Taught Me I discovered this experimentally through a 30-year business partnership. On the surface, everything looked successful. Yet my partner’s need for a certain degree of control over key aspects kept colliding with my own. What I did not see clearly at the time was that the friction was activating a deep, largely unconscious fear of scarcity in me—an old fear which had formed years earlier around the sudden loss of my father and the quiet terror of disappearing without being able to leave anything secure for those I cared about. I began managing the situation. I tried to protect what I felt was “mine,” to control outcomes, to reduce the sense of vulnerability. The more I pushed, the more difficult the relationship became. The strain was not really about the business details; it was about my personal fear trying to force the data stream into a safer configuration. It got uncomfortable. At times it seemed nearly unbearable. Then, a couple of years ago, something changed at a being level. It became obvious that the Larger Consciousness System would not simply let the pattern dissolve until the lesson was learned.