Show Notes
We all grew up believing that Friedrich Nietzsche was the German philosopher of the far right. Nietzsche’s ideal of the Overman or Übermensch has, for example, been equated with the Nazi ideal of Arno Breker’s sculptures, and with the Hollywood Superman. But Nietzsche, who died in 1900, a year after Hitler was born, had very peculiar visions of such higher men. Nietzsche’s attacks on Christianity, declaring God dead, and calling for the abolition of Catholic morality, and for the overturning of all Western values, however, have each laid the foundation for the modern-day trans-liberal LGBT circus cult. Nietzsche’s ideas have shaped the modern Left far more than the modern Right. To find clues about professor Nietzsche’s true intentions, we must look no further than to his interactions with some of his male students, such as when he suggested to a pupil, after a lecture he gave in Basel, to go to Italy together. The young man, embarrassed in front of his class, stammered that he couldn’t go, and Nietzsche never spoke to the pupil again. It gets much more explicit. Traveling Italy by himself at age 38, Nietzsche mentioned in his diary a “menacing … attack of desire … when the lonely man embraces the first man to come his way and treat him as a precious gift from heaven.” To his friend Paul Ree, he wrote, “I had a kind of unrequited love for you.” And to childhood friend Erwin Rohde, Nietzsche wrote: “It fills me with profound dissatisfaction that we cannot live together. We are virtuosi on an instrument that other men cannot and will not listen to but which is for us the source of the greatest enchantment.” What instrument? Of course, he meant his phallus because Friedrich Nietzsche was a f****t. His entire philosophy served merely to justify his desires. Here, then, Nietzsche caused confusion by writing frequently in a style that later appealed to right-wing nationalists. Wherever Nietzsche wrote in his books of free spirits, Übermenschen, or higher men, in actuality, he meant gays and crossdressers. Nietzsche thought that the Overman, like himself, should transcend simple people’s heteronormativity. Like many afflicted by his condition, it is likely that Nietzsche felt intensely superior about his degenerate nature, for it presupposes an extreme narcissism. Indeed, homosexuality is usually a byproduct of having a narcissistic personality disorder. Such people tend to look for mates whose faces are most similar to their own, whereas straight people tend to look for mates who look a bit different from themselves. This why heterosexual couples complement each other, whereas in homosexual relationships, they duplicate each other. And then it gets even worse. Near the end of his book Zarathustra, there was supposed to be a chapter called the “Ass-Festival”, referring to the animal, i.e., a donkey. Swiss psychoanalyst Carl Jung, in his extensive analysis of Nietzsche and his work Zarathustra, remarks on page 1492 of this tome: “… and when he became insane, Nietzsche produced the most shocking erotic literature. It was destroyed by his careful sister, but professor Overbeck had a glimpse of it, and there is plenty of evidence of [Nietzsche’s] pathological condition.” According to Jung, the ass represents a symbol of voluptuousness, and this theme returns in other poems by Nietzsche’s hand. It isn’t too far-fetched to figure out why Nietzsche’s sister deleted this story about Übermenschen having an orgy with donkeys. Nietzsche, by his twisted logic, believed Europeans needed such new festivals in order to become superior. I conclude that Friedrich Nietzsche was a perverted and mentally ill man whose writings belong in the realm of the far-left. He was a morally depraved communist, not at all supportive of nationalist health. Though he may have felt smugly superior about his condition, it disqualifies his works. Nietzsche conceived his Übermensch not as a blue-eyed hetero-Superman, but rather as a brown, transhuman, transgender de
More from The Great Johannes Podcast
In this livestreamed discussion, I went over several concepts relating to White men as the world’s scapegoats. And that—though we cannot change the role—we can stop playing it. By focusing on what we still can do for ourselves, we win status and competence on our own terms. That is something society cannot prevent us from doing. So, we escape the scapegoat role by refusing to argue for better treatment. Instead, we start treating ourselves right.
It turns out that people’s sense of race and language develops simultaneously. Meaning, a White American child would expect other White children to speak their language. But if they meet a brown child who speak proper American English, they will prefer the brown child to another White child who can’t speak English well. Elites, therefore, united behind their shared accents and dialects, usually the language of the power elite. However, rural people cannot unite behind a single language, since they speak wildly different dialects. And so, rural resisters must unite themselves behind race and religion.
In short, Epstein was working for the Rothschilds. He was a basic occultist working for Satanists. Their goal is to use technology to erase human religiousness. The Bill Gates jibby-jab may have been an attempt to chemically erase religiosity in some people. Elites hate Christianity, especially the patriarchal branch, because it guarantees people a free will. And elites rather see people as happy servants, bred to be slaves.
Nearly every Western nation is suffering an aging population, mass immigration, political corruption, an affordable housing crisis, and an anti-White media. Diversity is called a strength, or has it really been the result of our weakness in other domains? The Western world initially believed it could relegate Chinese industry into a position of eternal supplier to our needs. Then it appeared that China might win top dog position in the economic hierarchy of national rankings. In response, Western elites decided that we needed to get India to side with the West, at all cost. But how could we convince the massive population of India to fight with us against China? This, our ruling classes believed, could be achieved through a massive transfer wealth, namely to buy loyalty. India today is the number one recipient of remittances coming out of the USA. Remember Christmas 2024 when even Elon Musk started calling white people retarded if they didn’t like the h1b visa scam that was bringing in hundreds of thousands if not millions of Indians into the USA? His concern must have been that China wasn’t going to need any more Teslas and that Tesla was going to need the Indian market to both sell Tesla cars to and to have them produced there more cheaply. Perhaps the idea was to get to China and India to compete on price for Western consumer demands. So we learned that we can never trust our billionaire overclass’ interests because their interests are global and ours are local and national. The average person living in the West does not live globally but lives nationally at best, and how many people do you know who never even leave their local neighborhood because they work and study and go out in the same nearby streets? The needs of globalism have become a threat to our national survival. We are no longer investing in rearing children of our own because our foreign policy priorities are that we first house Indian or Somali immigrants for geopolitical reasons. A part of Somalia called Somaliland, for example, is a piece of real estate necessary for the defense of international trade routes along the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden. And so it seems that the Somali daycare scam in the state of Minnesota under the supervision of former vice presidential candidate Tim waltz is most definitely a dark money scheme to funnel U.S. taxpayer funds to illicit foreign organizations. Chinese strategists however foresee a totally different outcome. They believe that China will take the number one position as the world’s next only superpower. They believe that the U.S. and India will ultimately be competing against each other for second and third place positions. If this indeed were the outcome, then the USA will no longer be able to fund the defense of Israel, in which case that piece of real estate will fall into the hands of Arabs backed by China. No, I don’t support Israel or its regime. And no, I also don’t support China taking over the territory. But if China did take over the Middle East, it would then rule all international trade. And then, in such a scenario, what is to become of Europe? Already the USA seems incapable of defending Europe under its NATO pact. Of course Europe shouldn’t have to rely on defenses paid for by the USA. Europe should rather become independent. Europe, today, is importing over 60% of its energy needs from outside of the EU bloc. How can Europe ever be independent? For starters, we could reduce our surplus population. What I personally foresee is that the economic wealth of the West is going to wither away, that the Western military presence around the world will have to be largely withdrawn, and that we will once again realize that our most precious assets are our own people living on their own land. But there is a serious risk of subjugation by foreign enemies. Our land will require heavy defenses in the near future, since Europe is surrounded by its Islamic enemies and even the Russian leaders are dreaming of annexing
Thanks to TikTok’s Daniel Clark (who gets banned often), Johannes (English), and Seth. Note that Seth isn’t a member of the Vryburger Beweging, but added his comments about New Jersey and the situation in the USA. We spoke at length about the situation in South Africa, and about how to organize successfully against the “Woke Rainbow” governments. A great insight was delivered by South African Johannes, namely that “normie” White people tend to arrive at the same conclusions once they’ve had the same experiences.