Amor Mundi Part 1: Unchained from Our Sun / Miroslav Volf's 2025 Gifford Lectures
For the Life of the World / Yale Center for Faith & CultureShow Notes
Miroslav Volf on how to rightly love a radically ambivalent world.
“The world, our planetary home, certainly needs to be changed, improved. But what it needs even more is to be rightly loved.”
Miroslav Volf begins his 2025 Gifford Lectures at the University of Aberdeen with a provocative theological inquiry: What difference does belief in God make for our relationship to the world? Drawing deeply from Nietzsche’s “death of God,” Schopenhauer’s despair, and Hannah Arendt’s vision of *amor mundi*, Volf explores the ambivalence of modern life—its beauty and horror, its resonance and alienation. Can we truly love the world, even amidst its chaos and collapse? Can a belief in the God of Jesus Christ provide motivation to love—not as appetite or utility, but as radical, unconditional affirmation? Volf suggests that faith offers not a retreat from reality, but an anchor amid its disorder—a trust that enables us to hope, even when the world’s goodness seems impossible. This first lecture challenges us to consider the character of our relationship to the world, between atheism and theism, critique and love.
**Episode Highlights**
1. “The world, our planetary home, certainly needs to be changed, improved. But what it needs even more is to be rightly loved.” 2. “Resonance seems both indispensable and insufficient. But what should supplement it? What should underpin it?” 3. “Our love for that lived world is what these lectures are about.” 4. “We can reject and hate one form of the world because we love the world as such.” 5. “Though God is fully alive… we often find the same God asleep when our boats are about to capsize.”
**Helpful Links and References**
- [Resonance by Hartmut Rosa](https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Resonance%3A+A+Sociology+of+Our+Relationship+to+the+World-p-9781509519927) - [The Human Condition by Hannah Arendt](https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/H/bo29137972.html) - [This Life by Martin Hägglund](https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/248368/this-life-by-martin-hagglund/) - [The Home of God by Miroslav Volf and Ryan McAnnally-Linz](https://bakerpublishinggroup.com/books/the-home-of-god/404972) - [The City of God by Augustine](https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/1201.htm) - [Divine Comedy by Dante](https://digitaldante.columbia.edu/dante/divine-comedy/)
**Show Notes**
- Paul Nimmo introduces the Gifford Lectures and Miroslav Volf’s theme - Volf begins with gratitude and scope: belief in God and our world - Introduces Nietzsche's “death of God” as cultural metaphor - Frames plausibility vs. desirability of God's existence - Introduces Hartmut Rosa’s theory of resonance - Problem: resonance is not enough; what underpins motivation to care? - Introduces *amor mundi* as thematic direction of the lectures - Contrasts Marx’s atheism and human liberation with Nietzsche’s nihilism - Analyzes Dante and Beatrice in Hägglund’s *This Life* - Distinguishes between “world” and “form of the world” - Uses cruise ship metaphor to critique modern life’s ambivalence - Discusses Augustine, Hannah Arendt, and *The Home of God* - Reflections on divine providence and theodicy - Biblical images: flood, exile, and the sleeping God - Ends with preview of next lectures on Schopenhauer and Nietzsche - Let me know if you'd like episode-specific artwork prompts, promotional copy for social media, or a transcript excerpt formatted for publication.
**Production Notes**
- This podcast featured Miroslav Volf - Edited and Produced by Evan Rosa - Hosted by Evan Rosa - Production Assistance by Taylor Craig and Macie Bridge - A Production of the Yale Center for Faith & Culture at Yale Divinity School https://faith.yale.edu/about - Support For the Life of the World podcast by giving to the Yale Center for Faith & Culture: https://faith.yale.edu/give - Special thanks to Dr. Paul Nimmo, Paula Duncan, and the media team at the University of Aberdeen. Thanks also to the Templeton Religion Trust for their support of the University of Aberdeen’
More from For the Life of the World / Yale Center for Faith & Culture
What happens when an ancient discipline built to remake the self in the context of a way of life and normative map gets sold back to us as lifehacking for stress relief and optimization?
It took Odysseus ten years to sail home from Troy to Ithaca; we can fly the same distance in about an hour. But faster travel hasn't brought us any closer to home. We can know more, do more, and connect more than ever, and yet our ability to belong to our own reality seems to be shrinking. Philosopher Ian Marcus Corbin, who teaches at Harvard Medical School and directs Harvard's Public Culture Project, takes up that paradox in his new book, To Arrive Where We Started: Belonging in the Modern World. The title comes from T.S. Eliot's Four Quartets, and Corbin reads Eliot's lines as something like a mission statement for humanity: the point of the journey is not to escape reality or optimize our way around it, but to truly belong to it.
Everything is “maxxed” right now, and the news cycle in particular seems to be historymaxxing, insisting that things have never been worse than they are now. And the threats are real, from AI and global warming to election integrity—foreign affairs gone wrong, and violence abroad, in our homes, and in our schools. But the news maxxes us on fear, and so do politicians and corporations, because they want us to do something. If theologian Lee C. Camp is right, history was already maxed at the incarnation, and it came through a subversive way of life: humble, compassionate, at times angry, but radical and scandalous all the same. Camp, author of *Scandalous Witness: A Little Political Manifesto for Christians* and founder and host of the nationally syndicated podcast and radio show No Small Endeavor, argues that the idolatry of the nation state, and even the effort to legislate Christian morality and values into a political movement, is a subversion of Christianity.
Human growth can seem to just happen—genes, care, and nurture set each of us on a trajectory across the lifespan. But how do people actually grow toward wholeness, and is virtue even the point?
Technology, Aaron Cline Hanbury suggests, is never a purely neutral tool. But the history of ethical thinking about technology shows that as long as there's been technology, there's been anxiety about it. Or perhaps more accurately, anxiety about what we might do with it. And increasingly, what it might do to us.