E02 Dysphagia & Dementia Part 1: What we Need to Learn & Unlearn with Jackie Rodriguez
Dysphagia Research BitesShow Notes
Dysphagia doesn't show up in isolation. It shows up alongside memory loss, behavioural & sensory changes, communication breakdowns and alongside an aging swallow. In part 1 of this episode of Dysphagia Research Bites, Chantelle sits down with Jackie Rodriguez, Speech-Language Pathologist, to unpack the dual diagnosis challenge of dementia and dysphagia, and why assessing swallowing in this population requires a fundamentally different clinical lens.
In this episode we cover:
Why dementia and dysphagia together present a unique and underrecognised clinical challenge Jackie's story of how this became an area of interest An introduction to the article: Dysphagia in Persons with Dementia: The Dual Diagnosis Challenge by Michelle Tristani A discussion on terminology and why the language we use with this population matters Functional approaches to assessing dysphagia in adults with dementia Some cognitive assessments that SLPs should know about
Assessments mentioned in this episode:
Dementia Mealtime Assessment Tool (DMAT) Environment & Communication Assessment Toolkit (ECAT) for Dementia Care The Saint Louis University Mental Status (SLUMS) The Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Cognitive Linguistic Quick Test (CLQT) Global Deterioration Scale (GDS)
Be sure to check out Jackie’s ebook: The SLPs Guide to Dementia You can find it here: https://www.teacherspayteachers.com/Product/The-SLPs-Guide-to-Dementia-11781923
The publication this episode is based on: Dysphagia in Persons with Dementia: Tristani, M (2016). The Dual Diagnosis Challenge. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups Volume 1, Number 15 Pages 105-116 https://doi.org/10.1044/persp1.SIG15.105
For comprehensive evidence-based dysphagia education beyond the podcast, head to: https://www.dysphagiabites.com/clinical-swallow-evaluation-course
More from Dysphagia Research Bites
Is it a case of trouble with swallowing or trouble with eating? In this episode, Dr Megan Parsons, medical speech-language pathologist, unpacks a framework that changed how she thinks about swallowing problems. Chantelle and Megan explore why “dysphagia” isn’t always a problem of the swallow itself, and why working out what is driving the difficulty might be the most important clinical question we ask. If you’ve ever documented “dysphagia” without being sure what was driving it, this episode is for you.
Safety, nutrition, enjoyment and the dining experience all need to be part of the conversation when we are talking about texture modified meals in aged care. In this episode of Dysphagia Research Bites, Chantelle sits down with Vanessa Chan to unpack a mixed methods study looking into these very things. They explore the whole journey of a meal, from the kitchen to the dining room, and what speech pathologists can do to influence it.
How many times does your patient swallow in a minute? It sounds like a simple question but the answer might tell you more than you'd expect. In this episode of Dysphagia Research Bites, Chantelle sits down with Dr Sonal Pathak to explore spontaneous swallowing frequency: what it is, how it's measured, and why it could become one of the most practical objective tools in your clinical toolkit, both at the bedside in hospital and out in the community.
What if you could interpret a video fluoroscopy report the way a doctor reads a blood test, with clear reference ranges, and the ability to say with confidence whether a value is within or outside what's expected for a healthy adult? That's exactly what Dr Catriona Steele and her team at the University of Toronto have been working on, and in this episode she walks us through what they've found.
Aspiration and aspiration pneumonia are not the same thing. We know this theoretically. In this episode of Dysphagia Research Bites, Chantelle sits down with Melissa Kane to unpack a 2022 tutorial paper that illustrates the case for looking beyond aspiration itself and toward the individual: their host defences, their medical complexity, their oral health, their lifestyle, when determining the real risk of an adverse event.