Show Notes
In this episode, Lessig outlines what happens if Maine passes Question 1. What are the next steps, and the arguments that will get us to the Supreme Court — and to victory! Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See https://pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
More from Another Way, by Lawrence Lessig
Nico Agosta and Daniel Lobo-Lewis of the Political Integrity Project join Lawrence Lessig, Harvard Law School professor, and Maia Cook, Executive Director of Equal Citizens, on the Another Way podcast to explain how they made money in politics go viral. 🗳️
On this episode, Lessig speaks with Ron Fein, the former Legal Director at Free Speech For People who now serves as Senior Legal Advisor for Democracy Forward. The two discuss the history of the various legal efforts to end SuperPACs and why Dinner Table Action v. Schneider has a strong chance of succeeding.
On July 29th, 2026, our legal team, led by Neal Katyal, argued in front of the First Circuit Court of Appeals in our case that could end SuperPACs. On this episode, we air the full audio of the oral arguments. Listen closely to how seriously the judges grapple with our argument.
On this episode, Lessig speaks with Christopher Robertson, who serves as both a law professor at Boston University School Of Law and Professor of Health Law, Policy & Management in the Boston University School of Public Health. Robertson authored a study empirically assessing at what levels of contributions the public perceives the appearance of corruption. This work is essential evidence in our lawsuit to end SuperPACs and the two discuss the results in detail.
On this episode, Lessig speaks with Jonathan Gienapp, an associate professor of history and law at Stanford University. The two discuss whether the original meaning of the First Amendment gives the people of Maine — or the U.S. Congress — the ability to limit the size of contributions to SuperPACs. Spoiler: The answer is yes.