Show Notes
In this episode of In Vivo, I sit down with Dr. Rasmus Rosenberg Larsen, Assistant Professor of Forensic Epistemology at the University of Toronto and author of Psychopathy Unmasked: The Rise and Fall of a Dangerous Diagnosis (MIT Press).
Larsen challenges nearly every major claim about psychopathy: that people with high PCL-R scores lack empathy, are uniquely dangerous, are untreatable, have distinctive brains, or even form a coherent clinical category. Drawing on systematic reviews, historical analysis, and legal case data, he argues that psychopathy may be a “zombie idea”, an intuitively appealing concept that has survived despite a large body of contrary evidence.
We cover the 18th-century origins of the idea, the rise of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist, how the diagnosis is used to justify longer sentences and harsher outcomes, the famous Oak Ridge treatment study, and why figures like Ted Bundy and Adolf Hitler do not actually fit the classic profile. Larsen also discusses the ethical problems of using an unreliable tool in court and offers practical advice for clinicians, lawyers, and students.
00:00 – Introduction 01:58 – How Larsen got interested in psychopathy 04:11 – Historical origins: Benjamin Rush and “anomia” (1786) 09:30 – How psychopathy is defined today 13:13 – Why the diagnosis has unique power in court 16:31 – How the PCL-R is actually administered 28:28 – Why Ted Bundy is a poor example of psychopathy 33:03 – Does Bundy fit the classic scientific claims? 1:16:16 – What is a “zombie idea”? 1:41:23 – Genocides, ordinary people, and why they are not psychopaths 1:47:45 – Were Hitler, Stalin, or Mao psychopaths? 1:51:31 – Advice for students interested in the field 1:55:17 – Advice for clinicians, prosecutors, and defense attorneys 1:59:45 – Where to find the book and Larsen’s work
Website: https://www.rasmusrosenberg.com Book site: https://psychopathyunmasked.com Dr. Larsen’s X page: https://x.com/RasmusRosenberg Dr. Larsen’s LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rosenberglarsen/
In Vivo on X - https://x.com/InVivoPodOnX
In Vivo on Youtube - https://www.youtube.com/@InVivoPodcast
In Vivo on Apple Podcast - https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/in-vivo/id1775578563
In Vivo on Amazon Podcasts - https://music.amazon.ca/podcasts/1ac4dbec-df46-4d1f-b0a1-742e9656ef44/in-vivo
More from In Vivo
Philosopher and historian of science Dr. Justin Garson joins me to unpack The Madness Pill: One Doctor’s Quest to Understand Schizophrenia, the mid-century hunt for a pill that could temporarily induce schizophrenia so scientists could reverse-engineer a cure.
Dr. Jason Kelly, co-founder and CEO of Ginkgo Bioworks, joins me to unpack autonomous labs, what they are, why biology’s bench tooling barely moved in 20 years, and why the right analogy isn’t a subway or a car, but a Waymo. Is the biology singularity around the corner?
Cathy Tie (founder, Origin Genomics) and Prof. Jiang Xueqin (Predictive History) join me for a wide-open conversation on germline gene editing, the science, the ethics, and the geopolitics.
Jason Verbelli, founder of Galilean Variance and CEO/Lead Engineer at SEG Magnetics, argues that Einstein left a written test for his own theory: if the speed of light depends even a little on the motion of the source, relativity and Einstein’s theory of gravitation are false. In this interview we start from first principles and work up through John Searl, magnetic waveforms, free energy vs over-unity, the double-slit experiments, the Casimir effect, and what that would mean for energy, technology, and space travel.
In this episode, NASA space biologist Ryan T. Scott explains why biology, not rocket science, is the real limiting factor in humanity’s goal of becoming a multi-planetary species. We discuss how NASA’s Open Science Data Repository (OSDR) is transforming space biology by making decades of multi-modal data openly available, standardized, and reusable.