Rheumatology.Physio Podcast

Exercise For Rheumatology

Rheumatology.Physio Podcast

Show Notes

Welcome Back Rheumatology Fans, Exercise (which I like) and Rheumatology (which I also like) make excellent bedfellows but are often misunderstood and misapplied. I listened to a really great podcast on the topic and encourage you to as well. Full Podcast Thank you to The British Society For Rheumatology for publishing. A few takeaways for you below for you to apply in practice, lots more information and specifics for manageing Rheumatological Diseases on my online course, click below to enroll! 1. Exercise in Rheumatology is most effective when it’s personalised, contextualised, and initiated early. A recurring theme throughout the conversation is that “exercise” as a general recommendation is too blunt to be meaningful. Patients often hear the phrase “you should do more exercise” without any guidance about what type, when, how often, or how it fits their symptoms or values. As MSK clinicians, this is where our practice becomes pivotal. Patients take exercise advice most seriously when it comes from a trusted professional — and rheumatology health-care providers consistently rank highly as motivators. The clinical message for physiotherapists is that exercise advice is not a single event but a dialogue. Starting early matters: patients newly diagnosed with inflammatory disease often wait months for physiotherapy input, yet those same months are when they have the most to gain from movement-based reassurance. Even a brief “2-minute conversation” at the end of a medical consult — offering a starting point, normalising safe activity, suggesting step-count increases or simple balance work — can materially shift behaviour. The nuance comes from tailoring. The needs of an 85-year-old trying to maintain independence differ profoundly from a 20-year-old gym-goer. The role of the physio here is functional problem-solving: what matters to the patient? What are they already doing? How can behaviour be shaped using the smallest effective change? And crucially, how can we frame physical activity not as an intimidating prescription but as a spectrum — from daily activities to structured exercise — where all movement confers benefit? 2. All major exercise modalities can help rheumatic disease One of the clearest messages from the podcast is that we do not yet have a single “optimal” exercise type for any rheumatic disease. Aerobic training, strengthening work, flexibility, balance, aquatic exercise, yoga, tai chi — across the major rheumatic conditions, they all show benefit for pain, fatigue, function, sleep, and mood. The data are too heterogeneous to crown a winner, and forcing patients into a pre-chosen modality risks disengagement. For physiotherapists, this reinforces the importance of pragmatic exercise design. Loading principles still matter: tendons respond best to progressive load, bones respond to impact, and cardiovascular systems respond to sustained intensity. But instead of privileging one type of exercise, we should think of the four pillars — aerobic, strength, flexibility, balance/core — as tools we combine based on deficits, goals, and tolerance. The clinical takeaway is that our role is less about choosing the “right” modality and more about identifying the entry point that the patient can and will engage with. Exercise adherence depends more on enjoyment, identity, symptom confidence, and perceived safety than on the physiological superiority of any single training type. As research grows — including forthcoming EULAR guidelines — we may gain sharper distinctions between exercise formats. But right now, for the patient in front of us, the most effective exercise is the one they are willing and able to perform consistently. 3. Sports & Exercise Medicine complements, not replaces, rheumatology The podcast also offers a insight into when referrals to Sport & Exercise Medicine (SEM) can add real value. Three domains stand out: a) MSK pain that doesn’t map cleanly onto inflammatory activity Patients whose rheumatic disease

More from Rheumatology.Physio Podcast

Oct 22, 2026

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit rheumatologyphysio.substack.com

Sep 24, 2026

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit rheumatologyphysio.substack.com

Aug 20, 2026

Welcome Back Rheumatology Fans, Ooof this is going to rattle some cages. Synopsis below but the best of this is watching the video. A recent news report about a woman with rheumatoid arthritis who was convicted of benefit fraud caught my attention. The case involved footage of her participating in activities including gym classes and running events despite having previously reported substantial limitations in her day-to-day function. I don’t know enough about the individual circumstances to comment on whether the judgement was appropriate. In fact, the reported offence appears to relate specifically to failing to notify the Department for Work and Pensions of a change in circumstances. But the story raises a broader issue that is highly relevant to people living with inflammatory arthritis and the clinicians treating them. Being physically active does not necessarily mean someone is not disabled. Rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis and other long-term inflammatory diseases can be enormously variable. Symptoms may fluctuate over time, treatments can substantially improve function, and limitations in one activity do not necessarily predict someone’s ability to perform another. Exercise also forms an important part of rehabilitation. I might see someone who currently cannot run, play tennis or golf because their inflammatory arthritis is poorly controlled. Following improvements in medication and a structured rehabilitation programme, one of our explicit treatment goals might be to return them to those activities. For another person, the goal might simply be getting upstairs more comfortably. To achieve that, we may use relatively demanding strengthening exercises in a gym. Seeing that person performing a squat or leg press tells you very little, in isolation, about how easily they can negotiate their stairs later that day. That distinction matters. We should not create an environment where people receiving appropriate financial support become frightened of exercising because they worry that being seen in a gym, lifting weights or participating in sport could somehow be interpreted as evidence that they are no longer disabled. From a clinical perspective, I want people with inflammatory arthritis to be as active as their condition, preferences and circumstances allow. Where possible, that includes meeting general physical activity recommendations and incorporating cardiovascular and resistance exercise. There are good reasons for doing so. Maintaining physical activity can help protect muscle and bone, improve cardiovascular health and support broader long-term health outcomes. For some patients, returning to demanding exercise is itself a major marker of successful treatment. None of this means that changes in someone’s circumstances should not be reported where required. That is a separate issue. The important point is that exercise capacity and disability are not opposites. A person can exercise and still experience meaningful restrictions from inflammatory disease. They can also improve dramatically with treatment while continuing to have limitations elsewhere. As clinicians, we should be encouraging people towards greater function—not inadvertently giving them another reason to be afraid of achieving it.

Aug 13, 2026

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit rheumatologyphysio.substack.com

Jul 23, 2026

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit rheumatologyphysio.substack.com

See all episodes →