Show Notes
Mind the Age Gap | Retirement Age, Identity and the Psychology of Ageing
What does retirement age really mean in modern life?
In this episode of Mind the Gap, Michael Comyn explores the idea of the “age gap” — the gap between chronological age and how we actually experience ourselves.
The reflection begins with a moment in a bank: an older couple being gently coached through online banking. They were not confused. They looked displaced. That observation opens a wider discussion about ageing, identity, and the subtle ways institutions categorise people after 65.
Retirement age began as a 19th-century pension policy in Germany. Over time, it evolved into a powerful cultural label. Today, that label influences marketing, workplace perceptions, digital design, and even the tone of television advertising.
In this episode, Michael explores:
• The history of retirement age and its origins in public policy
• The psychology of subjective age and why most adults over 60 feel younger than their years
• The impact of marketing stereotypes, including the Werther’s Original “grandfather” campaign
• Why certain UK television channels seem dominated by funeral and cremation advertising
• The cultural reality that people now in their seventies once danced to The Rolling Stones
• Why ageing is not the issue, dismissal is
This episode blends psychology, leadership insight, cultural observation, and personal reflection to ask a simple question:
Is the real gap between 50 and 65 — or between vitality and resignation?
If you’ve ever felt younger than your demographic category, or sensed the system quietly repositioning you, this conversation will resonate.
More from Mind the Gap
Episode 90 of Mind the Gap is a pause rather than a conclusion.
You know the Dunning-Kruger effect. "The dumbest people are the most confident." Except that's not what the 1999 study actually found — and the correction most people haven't heard is stranger than the myth itself.
"We're a family here." You've heard it, probably from someone who meant it warmly. This week, Michael Comyn takes the phrase more seriously than it usually gets taken — and asks the question nobody stops to ask first: which kind of family, exactly?
The Space Shuttle Challenger disaster wasn't a surprise. Engineers had seen the same O-ring damage on earlier, successful flights — reviewed, discussed, waved through.
You already know the voice. This week, a different kind of gap — the one between the life you're living and the plot you never actually chose.