
The Dubins Exit Mount Sinai as Old Epstein Questions Resurface (Part 2) (10/26/26)
The Epstein ChroniclesSummary
Glenn and Eva Dubin's recent resignations from the boards of Mount Sinai and the Icahn School of Medicine have intensified scrutiny over their long-standing ties to Jeffrey Epstein. Virginia Giuffre's allegations, which identified Glenn Dubin as a powerful man involved in Epstein's trafficking network, have resurfaced, raising questions about the lack of public inquiry into his connections compared to other high-profile figures. Despite being accused under oath, Dubin's name remained largely absent from mainstream discussions surrounding Epstein until now.
Testimony from a former employee revealed disturbing incidents involving a 15-year-old girl who sought refuge at the Dubin household after a troubling experience with Epstein. This account, along with the Dubins' extensive financial and social ties to Epstein, suggests a deeper complicity that has gone largely unexamined. The Dubins' philanthropic efforts, including the establishment of the Dubin Breast Center, further complicate the narrative, as Epstein was known to have received preferential treatment at Mount Sinai despite his criminal history.
The recent release of documents related to Epstein's activities has shed light on the Dubins' roles in facilitating access to medical care for young women connected to Epstein. This has prompted calls for a more thorough investigation into their actions and the broader implications of their relationships within elite circles. As the public begins to demand accountability, the Dubins' departure from their prestigious positions may signal the start of a reckoning regarding the extent of their involvement in Epstein's network.
Show Notes
Glenn and Eva Dubin are back in the news, renewing scrutiny of their long-standing relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and raising fresh questions about why the couple remained comparatively insulated from the fallout surrounding his network for so many years. Unlike peripheral figures whose names surfaced briefly in contact books or social circles, the Dubins had a much deeper connection to Epstein that stretched across personal, financial, and institutional relationships. Despite that proximity, they were rarely subjected to the sustained public examination that followed other prominent Epstein associates.
The renewed attention makes the history of that relationship worth revisiting from the beginning. The Dubins did not suddenly become relevant because of the latest headlines; their names have repeatedly appeared throughout the broader Epstein record, often without becoming the central focus of scrutiny. As new reporting and documents continue to bring old relationships back into view, the question is no longer whether Glenn and Eva Dubin were significant figures in Epstein’s world, but why it took so long for their role to receive the level of attention it always warranted.
to contact me:
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
More from The Epstein Chronicles
Glenn and Eva Dubin are back in the news, renewing scrutiny of their long-standing relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and raising fresh questions about why the couple remained comparatively insulated from the fallout surrounding his network for so many years. Unlike peripheral figures whose names surfaced briefly in contact books or social circles, the Dubins had a much deeper connection to Epstein that stretched across personal, financial, and institutional relationships. Despite that proximity, they were rarely subjected to the sustained public examination that followed other prominent Epstein associates.
Epstein survivors have publicly challenged Lesley Groff's testimony before Congress, arguing that her portrayal of herself as someone who knew nothing about Epstein's abuse operation is fundamentally incompatible with their experiences. During her June 2026 testimony, Groff described Epstein as a "master manipulator" who kept his criminal conduct hidden from her and insisted that she never knowingly scheduled appointments for minors or witnessed abuse. But several survivors told CNN and other outlets that Groff was far more deeply involved than she admitted, alleging that she arranged logistics, handled payments, possessed identifying documents that would have revealed victims' ages, and was present during key moments in Epstein's operation.
Prince Andrew’s Epstein scandal was not something that simply happened to him; it grew out of a series of decisions he made himself. He maintained a friendship with Jeffrey Epstein even after Epstein had pleaded guilty in Florida to soliciting prostitution from a minor, stayed at Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse in 2010, and was photographed walking with him in Central Park during that same visit. Those choices destroyed any plausible claim that Andrew had been unknowingly caught in Epstein’s orbit before the financier’s crimes became public. He then compounded the damage with his 2019 BBC Newsnight interview, where his explanations for his relationship with Epstein and his responses to Virginia Giuffre’s allegations were widely viewed as evasive, implausible and astonishingly tone-deaf. Instead of ending the controversy, the interview intensified scrutiny and turned Andrew himself into one of the central figures in the Epstein fallout.
Ghislaine Maxwell was arrested by the FBI on July 2, 2020, at a secluded property in Bradford, New Hampshire, nearly a year after Jeffrey Epstein died in federal custody. Prosecutors alleged that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein’s abuse operation during the 1990s, accusing her of helping identify, recruit, groom and transport underage girls for Epstein to sexually abuse. The indictment charged her with conspiracy and transportation-related offenses involving minors, as well as two counts of perjury stemming from testimony she had given in an earlier civil case. Her arrest ended months of speculation over her whereabouts after Epstein’s 2019 arrest and death, during which Maxwell had largely disappeared from public view.
The UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) concluded that former Barclays CEO Jes Staley misled regulators about the depth of his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. The FCA determined that Staley “recklessly approved” misleading statements in a 2019 letter sent by Barclays, which downplayed his contact with Epstein and suggested their relationship had ended long before his tenure at the bank. In reality, correspondence revealed an ongoing relationship that continued for years after Epstein’s first conviction. The FCA ruled that Staley’s conduct demonstrated a lack of integrity and transparency expected of senior banking officials and issued a penalty totaling £1.8 million alongside a ban preventing him from holding any senior management or key function roles in the UK financial sector.