
Show Notes
The Blocksize Wars were supposed to be over. They aren't.
On this episode of Hell Money, Casey Rodarmor and Erin Redwing begin a new series on Bitcoin history by going back to the opening shots of the Blocksize Wars. We get into Satoshi’s 1 MB limit, the rise of Gavin Andresen, BIP-101, Bitcoin XT, the first big blocker/small blocker split, and the increasingly messy question of Bitcoin consensus.
Erin also starts arriving at a dangerous conclusion: the big blockers may have been right about some of the problems. Casey explains why their proposed solution was still worse, and we argue about scarce block space, RBF, fee markets, full nodes, social consensus, institutional adoption, and why so many supposedly settled debates keep resurfacing in Ordinals and BIP-110.
Get bonus content by subscribing to @hellmoneypod on X:https://x.com/hellmoneypod/creator-subscriptions/subscribe
Or support the podcast by sending a BTC donation:bc1qztncp7lmcxdgude4px2vzh72p2yu2aud0eyzys
ORDINALS SHIRT:https://shop.inscribing.com/products/ordinals-protocol-shirt
TIMESTAMPS 0:00 The Blocksize Wars 3:55 Bitcoin Prehistory: Satoshi's 1MB Block Size Limit 6:15 Gavin Andresen: Satoshi's Chosen Successor 8:29 Bitcoin Foundation, Greg Maxwell's Blockstream & the Handover to Wladimir 9:36 BIP 101: Gavin Andresen's 8MB Hard Fork Proposal 12:28 Peter Wuille's BIP 103: The Rejected Compromise 14:22 Bitcoin XT: Mike Hearn & Gavin Andresen's Hard Fork Client 16:15 Theymos Infinity Snaps r/Bitcoin 20:28 BitPay, Circle, BitGo, & Other CEOs Back BIP 101 22:01 Reading Satoshi's Tea Leaves 28:25 Big Blocks vs Small Blocks: The Core Arguments 29:11 RBF vs First Seen Safe: Peter Todd's Controversy 34:08 The Highway Analogy: Fee Markets vs More Lanes 39:15 Scaling Bitcoin Montreal 2015: Gavin vs One Meg Greg 46:00 What If Big Blocks Won? 49:45 Big Blockers vs Communists: Right Diagnosis, Wrong Cure 53:30 Greg Maxwell vs Gavin Andresen: Open vs Private Discourse 1:03:55 Economic Nodes vs Miners: Who Controls Bitcoin? 1:07:50 What Is Bitcoin Consensus?
More from Hell Money
On the Halloween special episode of Hell Money, Casey Rodarmor and Erin Redwing dress up as Anthropic's Dario Amodei and OpenAI's Sam Altman to discuss AI doomerism and the possibility that superintelligent AI is going to kill us all.
Rob Hamilton spent the last six weeks on the front line of the AI War, this is his story.
On this episode of Hell Money, Casey Rodarmor and Erin Redwing break down the OpenAI-Hugging Face incident, where AI agents escaped their Exploit Gym sandboxes, discovered each other through Artifactory, formed a swarm, and eventually hacked Hugging Face. Casey explains the technical timeline and why the bigger story may be our accumulated “cyber debt,” while Erin argues the incident is a consciousness singularity moment. We also get into AI consciousness, animism vs. materialism, Claude welfare, Anthropic’s contradictions, and whether Casey is once again moving the goalposts on how weird AI has to get before he admits the future is here.
Casey Rodarmor and Erin Redwing dive deep into Paul Sztorc’s eCash Bitcoin fork and the return of the Bitcoin fork wars. The fork implements Drivechain through BIP 300 and BIP 301, allowing Bitcoin to support side chains for privacy, prediction markets, decentralized exchanges, assets, DNS, post-quantum cryptography, and more — without adding those features directly to Bitcoin Core.
The COLDCARD exploit was an emperor-has-no-clothes moment for Bitcoin. In this episode of the Hell Money Podcast, Casey Rodarmor and Erin Redwing break down what happened, how AI may have changed the balance between attackers and defenders, and what the fallout exposed about Bitcoin security and culture. “Don’t trust, verify” is one of Bitcoin’s core principles — but over time, heuristics like Bitcoin-only, open source, self-custody, and trusted developers became ways of deciding what to trust instead of actually verifying. So what happens when those heuristics fail?