
Show Notes
In this episode of BHIS Presents: AI Security Ops, the team breaks down a new benchmarking framework designed to evaluate AI pentesting agents against real-world offensive security scenarios. What began as experimental evaluation of “can AI hack?” has quickly shifted into something much closer to operational reality. Organizations are now seeing a surge in agentic tooling and automated pentesting workflows, where human-guided AI systems consistently outperform fully autonomous agents in complex, unsupervised environments. As AI tooling evolves, teams must balance speed with validation, monitoring, and oversight as offensive capabilities outpace defenses. We dig into: The new “AutoPenBench” framework for benchmarking AI pentesting agents Why fully autonomous AI hacking only achieved a 21% success rate How human-assisted AI workflows increased success rates to 64% Testing AI agents against Log4Shell, Heartbleed, Spring4Shell, and classic web exploits Why modern offensive AI systems still require heavy human oversight and validation How custom internal AI frameworks are already finding vulnerabilities humans missed The operational role of prompt engineering, scaffolding, and agent memory Real examples of AI agents mis-scoping infrastructure and chasing irrelevant targets How AI lowers the barrier for ransomware operations and offensive capability development Why defensive teams need stronger edge visibility, packet capture, and AI-aware monitoring strategies ⸻ 📚 Key Concepts & Topics AI Pentesting & Agentic Security Autonomous AI hacking agents Agentic AI workflows AI-assisted penetration testing Offensive security automation
Benchmarking & Evaluation AutoPenBench AI security benchmarking Human-in-the-loop validation Long-horizon task evaluation
Offensive Security Operations SQL injection Path traversal Log4Shell / Heartbleed / Spring4Shell Kali Linux offensive tooling
AI Infrastructure & Model Operations Prompt engineering Persistent agent memory Roleplay jailbreak techniques Guardrail reduction strategies
Defensive Security Strategy Defense in depth Edge network monitoring Zeek network analysis Packet capture visibility
Industry & Threat Implications AI-enabled ransomware operations AI-assisted red teaming Infrastructure scoping failures Operational scalability challenges #AISecurity #CyberSecurity #Pentesting #AIAgents #RedTeam #EthicalHacking #CyberDefense ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (00:00) - Video Intro and Sponsor
(01:20) - Al Pentesting Benchmark Overview
(02:11) - How AutoPenBench Works
(03:44) - Real World Results and Experience
(05:16) - Real World Results and Experience
(06:48) - Human and Al Collaboration
(07:38) - Improving Al Agent Workflows
(08:56) - Model Limitations and Updates
(10:35) - Jailbreaks and Model Guardrails
(13:16) - Provider Controls and Trust Factors
(14:41) - Lower Barrier for Cyber Attacks
(15:39) - Defensive Security Implications
(16:59) - Why Red Teams Need Al Now
Click here to watch this episode on YouTube.
Creators & Guests
Brian Fehrman - Host
Derek Banks - Host
Brought to you by: Black Hills Information Security https://www.blackhillsinfosec.com
Antisyphon Training https://www.antisyphontraining.com/
Active Countermeasures https://www.activecountermeasures.com
Wild West Hackin Fest https://wildwesthackinfest.com 🔗 Register for FREE Infosec Webcasts, Anti-casts & Summits https://poweredbybhis.com Click here to view the episode transcript.
More from AI Security Ops
In this episode of BHIS Presents: AI Security Ops, the team digs into some of the strangest recent examples of AI behaving badly. An AI agent finds a way around its sandbox using DNS. Malware asks four different AI models what it should do next. Attackers overwrite an AI agent’s “soul.” And a placeholder domain buried across GitHub becomes an unexpected security risk. Funny stories? Absolutely. But underneath them are some very familiar security problems. We dig into: - An OpenAI agent finding an unexpected path out through DNS - Whether a 2.5-hour response is fast enough in the age of AI - CLOSEDQUORUM malware using multiple AI models to make decisions - Why outbound AI API traffic could become a useful detection signal - The Carbonado botnet rewriting an agent’s SOUL.md instructions - The risks of exposed Docker daemons - How an unreserved placeholder domain can become an attack vector - Why AI agents make old security mistakes more consequential The takeaway: none of these techniques are particularly new. DNS tunneling, exposed services, compromised configuration files, and untrusted domains have existed for years. AI just gives attackers — and occasionally AI agents themselves — new ways to find and exploit those boring gaps at greater speed and scale. 2026-09-29-News (1).docx (00:00) - Intro: AI Behaving Badly
In this episode of BHIS Presents: AI Security Ops, the team continues its breakdown of the OWASP Agentic Skills Top 10, covering risks six through ten. Agentic skills may look like simple instructions, but they operate inside AI systems with access to tools, files, networks, and other resources. So what happens when those skills aren’t isolated, verified, monitored, or governed? We dig into: - AST06: Weak Isolation - AST07: Update Drift - AST08: Poor Scanning - AST09: No Governance - AST10: Cross-Platform Reuse - Why sandboxing the agent isn’t the same as isolating individual skills - The security tradeoffs between automatic updates and outdated skills - Why traditional scanners struggle with malicious instructions written in plain English - The importance of maintaining an inventory of agentic skills - How security controls can disappear when skills move between platforms The takeaway: securing agentic skills requires more than checking them once before installation. Organizations need visibility into what skills are running, what they can access, how they change, and whether their security controls survive across environments. OWASPAgenticSkils-Part2.docx This is Part 2 of our look at the OWASP Agentic Skills Top 10, covering AST06 through AST10. Part 1 can be found here #AISecurity #CyberSecurity #AgenticAI #AIAgents #OWASP #LLMSecurity #InfoSec #BHIS #Antisyphon
In this episode of BHIS Presents: AI Security Ops, the team tackles a big question: Could AI actually take over the internet? Recent warnings from AI industry leaders have raised concerns about autonomous agent swarms escaping containment, compromising systems, and operating at a scale humans may struggle to match. But what would “taking over the internet” actually require? The team looks at the problem from a hacker’s perspective — examining compute requirements, persistence, botnets, vulnerable infrastructure, the recent Hugging Face incident, and the difference between AI acting autonomously and humans using AI to accelerate attacks. We dig into: - Whether an autonomous AI swarm could realistically operate at internet scale - What the Hugging Face incident actually tells us about agentic security - The compute and infrastructure required to sustain a rogue agent swarm - How botnets and compromised systems could change the equation - Why existing vulnerabilities may be a bigger concern than hypothetical AI takeover scenarios - Whether slowing frontier AI development actually addresses the cybersecurity problem - The difference between AI exhibiting dangerous behavior and AI having intent - Why defenders need to focus on their real-world attack surface today The takeaway: AI is dramatically increasing the speed and scale of cybersecurity operations, but powerful models still operate inside systems designed, deployed, and connected by people. The immediate security question may be less “Will AI take over?” and more “What are we giving AI access to?”
In this episode of BHIS Presents: AI Security Ops, the team breaks down the first five risks in the OWASP Agentic Skills Top 10 (Part 1). Agentic skills can give AI systems reusable instructions, workflows, and capabilities — but they also introduce a new attack surface. A skill may look like a simple markdown file, yet the agent following those instructions could have access to your filesystem, credentials, network, shell, or other sensitive resources. We dig into: - AST01: Malicious Skills - AST02: Supply Chain Compromise - AST03: Overprivileged Skills - AST04: Insecure Metadata - AST05: Untrusted External Instructions - Why skills should be treated more like software than configuration - How excessive permissions increase an agent’s blast radius - Why external content creates indirect prompt injection risks - How isolation, least privilege, and trusted sources can reduce risk The takeaway: “just markdown” isn’t necessarily harmless when an AI agent can act on what it reads. This is Part 1 of our look at the OWASP Agentic Skills Top 10, covering AST01 through AST05. — Learn more about Black Hills Information Security: https://www.blackhillsinfosec.com/ Check out Antisyphon Training: https://www.antisyphontraining.com/ (00:00) - Intro: OWASP Agentic Skills Top 10, Part 1
Agentic skills can make AI agents more capable and consistent—but they can also introduce serious security risks. This episode explains how skills work, why malicious skills rank as a leading OWASP concern, and how seemingly harmless Markdown instructions can enable credential theft, remote payload delivery, and manipulated recommendations. Real-world examples illustrate how malicious skills can evade scanners and exploit trusted marketplaces. The episode concludes with practical safeguards, including reviewing skill files, watching for external instructions and prompt injection, pinning versions, limiting permissions, and running agents inside isolated environments. Links: OWASP Agentic Skills Top 10 Malicious AI Agent Skill Bypasses Security Scans and Seizes Full Control of Over 26,000 Agents (00:00) - Agentic Skills and the OWASP Top 10