Harsh Words, Harsh Consequences: What Employers Can Learn from an Unfair Dismissal Case
The Employment Law & HR PodcastShow Notes
In this episode 255 of the employment law and HR podcast I cover an employment tribunal decision where an employee who called their manager a derogatory name was found to have been unfairly dismissed. Although the language used was clearly inappropriate, the tribunal decided that dismissal was too severe a response. This episode unpacks why and what lessons both employers and employees can take from it.
In this episode we cover: The facts of the case – what actually happened and how the dispute reached tribunal. How the tribunal assessed whether the dismissal was fair in all the circumstances. The importance of proportionate disciplinary action and consistent treatment. Why context matters – including the employee's record, workplace culture, and employer policies. Practical steps for managers handling misconduct or inappropriate language at work. What this case teaches us about the balance between respect, communication, and fairness in disciplinary processes. Why it is important to consider getting a third party to deal with disciplinary issues or dispute when the employee is a family member or close friend.
Key takeaway: Even when language is offensive or unprofessional, dismissal is not automatically fair. Employers must consider all the circumstances and ensure their decision is reasonable, consistent, and procedurally sound.
Working with family can present different challenges but employment law still applies!
You can read the full judgement here: chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/64ae81ed8bc29f00132ccb82/Ms_K_Herbert_v_Main_Group_Services_Ltd_3310773.2022_FMH_Reserved_Judgment.pdf
Don't forget to subscribe to the podcast to stay informed on the latest in UK employment law. If you have questions or need tailored advice, feel free to get in touch – we are here to help.
Training for your Team Would you like to arrange training for your team to reduce the risk of both unhappy employees and claims being made against you? Please get in touch for a no obligation discussion, we can offer training anywhere in the UK in person or delivered remotely via MS Teams. Please drop me an email [email protected]
Fixed Price Advice from Real Experts
As part of our HR Harbour annual subscription service for employers we provide guidance and training for employers, supervisors and managers. If you would like to know more about the HR Harbour Service and how you can get unlimited support from as little as £234 per month please contact me for a no obligation discussion – [email protected] or you can find full details here: HR Harbour Don't forget you can contact us by telephone 01983 897003, 01722 653001, 020 3470 0007, 0191 375 9694 or 023 8098 2006 We have a variety of free documents and letters which are available to download here: DIY Documents We are also on YouTube! You can find a range of topics and also listen to this podcast on YouTube here: YOUTUBE
Zoes Law Raising awareness of melanoma and skin cancer. You can find more information here: https://www.facebook.com/zoepanayilaw
More from The Employment Law & HR Podcast
How to use AI effectively for an Employment case In this episode 268 of the podcast, I look at the recent Employment Appeal Tribunal decision in Hancox v Sutherland and Others [2026] EAT 139, in which a judge raised important concerns about the use of artificial intelligence in Employment Tribunal proceedings. The case involved an employee who submitted a 300-page skeleton argument prepared using ChatGPT, prompting the judge to comment on the growing use of AI by individuals representing themselves. I discuss what the judge said about the benefits and risks of AI, why lengthy AI-generated legal arguments can do more harm than good, and the importance of checking the accuracy of anything submitted to a Tribunal. I also consider what this decision means for employees, employers and HR professionals, and why AI can be a useful tool but should not replace sound legal advice and judgment. In this episode, we cover: The background to the Hancox case and the 300-page ChatGPT-generated argument. The judge's comments about AI and access to justice. The risks of inaccurate legal arguments and invented case law. The responsibilities of individuals using AI in Tribunal proceedings. Practical lessons for employers and employees dealing with AI-generated grievances and claims. Other Employment Tribunal cases that have referenced AI use. Rollo v Marstons Trading Ltd X v Secretary of State for Justice You can read the full judgment here: Hancox v Sutherland and Others [2026] EAT 139.
From the 30th October 2026 employers will be liable for the actions of strangers! In this episode 267 of the podcast I am covering a key change to the law which takes effect from the 30th October 2026 and one that many employers could find themselves falling foul of! Put simply all employers run the risk of liability for and a claim for third party harassment if they fail to take action.
In this episode 266 of the podcast I am covering a topic that has been much discussed among the Real Employment Law Advice team and which is causing increased stress and time for employers and managers, the use of AI by disgruntled employees. We are seeing a significant increase in AI being used by employees to draft grievances, prepare complaints, challenge decisions and fuel their desire to pursue Employment Tribunal claims.
Employment Tribunal awards compensation for an employers failure to make adjustments in the probation period In this episode 265 of the podcast I am covering a recent case decided by the Employment Tribunal where an employee was awarded compensation after the employer failed to make reasonable adjustments in the probation period. The case of Ms Khorram v Capgemini emphasises the importance of effectively managing probation periods and the requirement to make reasonable adjustments for employees with neurodivergent conditions.
This is going to be critical for all new employees from the 1st July 2026 In this episode 264 of the podcast I am covering the critical change to how managers and employers deal with probation periods for any new starters from the 1st July 2026. The qualifying period for unfair dismissal is going to be the shortest period it has ever been from the 1st January 2027 and this means employers need to prepare and manage probation periods and the first few months of a new employees employment carefully and proactively. Managers need to be educated on this now! In this episode of the podcast I cover: What probation periods are Why probation periods matter What is changing from the 1st July 2026 Why you need a good robust induction and onboarding process The importance of setting clear goals and targets for new starters in order to measure their performance and progress as soon as possible How getting it right does not have to be hard but does take time and planning Why having good forms and workflows for the process will aid managers to get the probation period right