
Summary
A recent investigation reveals a controversial strategy employed by Democratic operatives in Alaska, aimed at diluting votes against incumbent Republican Senator Dan Sullivan. The New York Times reports that operatives aligned with Democratic nominee Mary Peltola sought to recruit candidates with the same name as Sullivan to confuse voters in the upcoming midterm elections. This tactic, which could potentially mislead voters in Alaska's ranked-choice voting system, has raised significant ethical concerns.
The investigation uncovered communications among campaign staff discussing the recruitment of individuals named Dan Sullivan to run against the incumbent. One candidate, a little-known individual from a remote town, changed his party affiliation to Republican just before filing to run, raising suspicions about his legitimacy as a candidate. The campaign's strategy appears to be a coordinated effort to siphon votes away from Sullivan, thereby benefiting Peltola. This revelation has prompted calls for accountability and investigations into potential election interference.
In addition to the Alaska situation, the episode touches on broader issues of election integrity, including ongoing investigations into voter fraud in various states. The American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) has launched a "Protect the Vote" campaign, emphasizing the importance of ensuring that every lawful vote is counted and that election processes remain transparent and fair. As Election Day approaches, the implications of these findings could significantly impact voter trust and the electoral landscape.
Show Notes
The New York Times broke the story of Democrat officials rigging Alaska's midterm election ballot for the U.S. Senate in favor of Rep. Mary Peltola. This story comes on the heels of news that the Obama Administration had investigated whether Rep. Ilhan Omar married her brother, and a Biden-appointed U.S. attorney shut down the probe. The Sekulow team discusses the NYT's story on election fraud in Alaska, the Deep State covering up Omar's scandal, the ACLJ's legal work to preserve election integrity – and much more.
More from Sekulow
The ACLJ just obtained FOIA records from Cheverly, Maryland, showing that 25% of their Noncitizen Voter Registry appears to have voted in at least one federal election. Let that sink in: one out of four noncitizens on Cheverly's noncitizen voter roll appears to have voted in at least one federal election. This is either evidence of massive voter fraud where noncitizens are voting in yet another state or gross incompetence on the part of voter registry officials. The Sekulow team discusses the ACLJ's bombshell report on noncitizen voting, the Trump Administration's efforts to bolster voter turnout, the ACLJ's legal work to preserve election integrity – and much more.
MAJOR UPDATE: Feds Zero in on Swalwell and Comey.
BREAKING: Hakeem Jeffries 'Diabolical' Election Warning.
BREAKING: Fake Poll Scandal Takes Bizarre Twist.