Show Notes
I introduced the livestream with a talk about how different environments modulate human behavior and culture. And then I turned to the main topic, which were the migrant riots in Torre Pacheco, Spain: Locals from the Spanish town of Torre Pacheco, located in the country’s south-eastern region of Murcia, just south of Valencia and Alicante, decided not to lavish violent Moroccan migrants with praise, but rather to hunt them down and teach them a lesson after violent youths brutally attacked an elderly man. Yet, the Western mainstream media, all in unison, decided to cry foul and accuse native Spaniards of being organized right-wing extremists. But why? The hunt for violent migrants triggers fear, not only in the migrant populations, but especially in the leftist extremists professing a sort of White man’s burden, in that they think that White people are supposed to be responsible babysitters while immigrant children burn down our societies. In Torre Pacheco, a town with a population of just 35,000 people, over 30% of the inhabitants are now migrants, most of those from Morocco, and many of them illegal, despite Morocco being a relative safe-haven. It is not a war zone. Morocco is not being bombed by the West, either. Johannes MK is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Moroccans have simply given birth to too many children without caring to offer them a future in their shitty economy. That’s no one else’s fault but their own, and it certainly isn’t the responsibility of Europeans to, now, absorb Morocco’s unwanted young males. Let’s not even make that distinction between legal and illegal immigration. Every non-European migrant is one too many in Europe. The European Union seems to have adopted the dogma of George Soros and his Open Society Foundations that Europe must absorb 1 million migrants per year, minimum, and supposedly indefinitely, until White Europeans have either been erased or civil war settles the score. Well, civil war was has arrived. Southern Spain, apart from its tourist destination, isn’t considered a rich region of the world, either. So when violent Moroccan thugs beat up a grandfatherly man, a 68-year-old, his bludgeoned eyes sparked a flame in the hearts of local Spaniards. Genetic memories of the Reconquista must have driven their actions, perhaps guided by the spirit of El Cid Campeador. Who could blame them? But does a spontaneous response qualify to call these locals ‘right-wing extremists’, as even American media have done, just because their actions were announced in a shared Telegram or WhatsApp group? No, these locals likely have no political affiliations other than being fed up with the uncontrolled violence of an increasing number of unwanted guests. Why, after all, should any people sit by idly while foreign people, with the full protection of the law, can take over one’s town? The White backlash over unwanted immigrants does threaten to pop the liberal feel-good bubble. It turns out there are limits to diversity, and Europeans aren’t naturally going to allow foreign hordes to extinguish them with higher birth rates and racially motivated sexual violence. Western leftists are so embedded in their woolly vanity project called diversity and inclusion, that they refuse to accept that migrants can be perpetrators, too. They prefer explaining away any backlash against violent foreigners, rapists, murderers, thieves, and other cognitively impaired weirdos by claiming that the migrants are the real victims. How does that even work? This, they say, is because violent, extremist migrants really are like small children who need to be raised and educated into Europe’s future doctors and engineers, though IQ tests already prove otherwise. We can all suspect that Western feminism, which has put many liberal women into positions of power, plays a role. Instead of using their power to protect their own people, these White femin
More from The Great Johannes Podcast
In this livestreamed discussion, I went over several concepts relating to White men as the world’s scapegoats. And that—though we cannot change the role—we can stop playing it. By focusing on what we still can do for ourselves, we win status and competence on our own terms. That is something society cannot prevent us from doing. So, we escape the scapegoat role by refusing to argue for better treatment. Instead, we start treating ourselves right.
It turns out that people’s sense of race and language develops simultaneously. Meaning, a White American child would expect other White children to speak their language. But if they meet a brown child who speak proper American English, they will prefer the brown child to another White child who can’t speak English well. Elites, therefore, united behind their shared accents and dialects, usually the language of the power elite. However, rural people cannot unite behind a single language, since they speak wildly different dialects. And so, rural resisters must unite themselves behind race and religion.
In short, Epstein was working for the Rothschilds. He was a basic occultist working for Satanists. Their goal is to use technology to erase human religiousness. The Bill Gates jibby-jab may have been an attempt to chemically erase religiosity in some people. Elites hate Christianity, especially the patriarchal branch, because it guarantees people a free will. And elites rather see people as happy servants, bred to be slaves.
Nearly every Western nation is suffering an aging population, mass immigration, political corruption, an affordable housing crisis, and an anti-White media. Diversity is called a strength, or has it really been the result of our weakness in other domains? The Western world initially believed it could relegate Chinese industry into a position of eternal supplier to our needs. Then it appeared that China might win top dog position in the economic hierarchy of national rankings. In response, Western elites decided that we needed to get India to side with the West, at all cost. But how could we convince the massive population of India to fight with us against China? This, our ruling classes believed, could be achieved through a massive transfer wealth, namely to buy loyalty. India today is the number one recipient of remittances coming out of the USA. Remember Christmas 2024 when even Elon Musk started calling white people retarded if they didn’t like the h1b visa scam that was bringing in hundreds of thousands if not millions of Indians into the USA? His concern must have been that China wasn’t going to need any more Teslas and that Tesla was going to need the Indian market to both sell Tesla cars to and to have them produced there more cheaply. Perhaps the idea was to get to China and India to compete on price for Western consumer demands. So we learned that we can never trust our billionaire overclass’ interests because their interests are global and ours are local and national. The average person living in the West does not live globally but lives nationally at best, and how many people do you know who never even leave their local neighborhood because they work and study and go out in the same nearby streets? The needs of globalism have become a threat to our national survival. We are no longer investing in rearing children of our own because our foreign policy priorities are that we first house Indian or Somali immigrants for geopolitical reasons. A part of Somalia called Somaliland, for example, is a piece of real estate necessary for the defense of international trade routes along the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden. And so it seems that the Somali daycare scam in the state of Minnesota under the supervision of former vice presidential candidate Tim waltz is most definitely a dark money scheme to funnel U.S. taxpayer funds to illicit foreign organizations. Chinese strategists however foresee a totally different outcome. They believe that China will take the number one position as the world’s next only superpower. They believe that the U.S. and India will ultimately be competing against each other for second and third place positions. If this indeed were the outcome, then the USA will no longer be able to fund the defense of Israel, in which case that piece of real estate will fall into the hands of Arabs backed by China. No, I don’t support Israel or its regime. And no, I also don’t support China taking over the territory. But if China did take over the Middle East, it would then rule all international trade. And then, in such a scenario, what is to become of Europe? Already the USA seems incapable of defending Europe under its NATO pact. Of course Europe shouldn’t have to rely on defenses paid for by the USA. Europe should rather become independent. Europe, today, is importing over 60% of its energy needs from outside of the EU bloc. How can Europe ever be independent? For starters, we could reduce our surplus population. What I personally foresee is that the economic wealth of the West is going to wither away, that the Western military presence around the world will have to be largely withdrawn, and that we will once again realize that our most precious assets are our own people living on their own land. But there is a serious risk of subjugation by foreign enemies. Our land will require heavy defenses in the near future, since Europe is surrounded by its Islamic enemies and even the Russian leaders are dreaming of annexing
Thanks to TikTok’s Daniel Clark (who gets banned often), Johannes (English), and Seth. Note that Seth isn’t a member of the Vryburger Beweging, but added his comments about New Jersey and the situation in the USA. We spoke at length about the situation in South Africa, and about how to organize successfully against the “Woke Rainbow” governments. A great insight was delivered by South African Johannes, namely that “normie” White people tend to arrive at the same conclusions once they’ve had the same experiences.