Show Notes
Where should a retirement cash buffer live when most of your wealth is already in super? If you're aiming to retire in ten years, is it better to build your outside portfolio first or split your investing between ETFs and super now? And once you're already retired, does it make sense to sell a large share portfolio just to get more money into super before pension phase?
In this listener Q&A, Dave and Hayden work through three super case studies that show how quickly contribution caps, access to your money and tax can complicate what looks like a fairly simple decision.
In this episode we'll discuss:
💰 Where a one to two year downturn buffer might sit when you're 56, plan to stop work at 59, and most of your investments are already inside super.
⏳ Why the gap between stopping work and being able to access super can matter more than fine-tuning where your cash earns interest.
🏦 What changes once concessional contribution caps are used, and the choice becomes keeping accessible cash outside super versus holding it inside a super cash option.
🔥 How a 39-year-old couple investing $7,000 a month could run into contribution caps if they leave their extra super contributions until later.
⚖️ Why building an ETF portfolio outside super first can look mathematically neat, but splitting contributions earlier may be simpler when contribution limits enter the picture.
📈 Why this couple's current savings and investing rate could leave them with substantially more than their estimated FIRE target, potentially changing the retirement timeline altogether.
🧾 What to consider when a retired investor with $500,000 outside super is advised to sell around $400,000 of investments and contribute the proceeds to super before starting pension phase.
💸 Why the cost base and embedded capital gains in an ETF portfolio can completely change the tax maths of moving that money into super.
🔍 Why a relatively small tax optimisation may matter less than being comfortable with how your retirement wealth is actually invested, structured and accessed.
The thread through all three questions is that super optimisation can look precise on a spreadsheet, but access, contribution caps, CGT and how the money is invested can matter just as much as the headline tax rate. Sometimes the difference between two sensible options is much smaller than it first appears.
Questions, disagreements or your own scenario: [email protected] or reach out on socials at Strong Money Australia and Pearler.
Follow us on Instagram Watch on Youtube Ask a Question FI Case Study Request Form Pearler Strong Money Australia Original Aussie FIRE e-book
Dave's books on Amazon and Spotify
Disclaimer: Any advice is general and does not consider your financial situation needs, or objectives, so consider whether it's appropriate for you. You should also consider seeking professional advice before making any financial decision. Pearler is an Authorised Representative 1281540 of Sanlam Private Wealth Pty Ltd AFSL 337927. Read the FSG available from https://pearler.com/financial-services-guide Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
More from Aussie FIRE | Financial Independence Retire Early
Your FIRE plan might look perfectly reasonable on paper. But what happens when the share market drops, an investment property needs a $20,000 repair, interest rates rise or the government starts changing tax rules? And if financial decisions are keeping you awake at night, is the answer to change your investments, change your thinking or simply accept that some things are outside your control?
Travel is supposed to be one of the things money gives you more freedom to enjoy. But when a holiday can cost $15,000 instead of $5,000, how do you keep seeing the world without feeling like every trip is sending your finances backwards?
If the goal is to live off your portfolio one day, why bother selling investments at all? Could you simply build a portfolio that throws off enough income to cover your spending, ignore the 4% rule and leave the assets themselves alone? It sounds neat. But once you look past the appeal of regular cash flow, the trade-offs get more interesting.
Retiring overseas might sound like a straightforward FIRE move. But what happens when your portfolio was built around Australia, changing tax residency could create a tax event, your partner has a completely different appetite for risk, or you finally start selling ETFs you have been buying for years?
How much of your relationship with money was shaped before you were old enough to earn any?